Religion and Subjective Well-Being in Ghana

被引:0
|
作者
Jelena Pokimica
Isaac Addai
Baffour K. Takyi
机构
[1] Lansing Community College,Social Science Department
[2] The University of Akron,Department of Sociology
来源
Social Indicators Research | 2012年 / 106卷
关键词
Religion; Subjective well-being; Perceived living conditions; Ghana; Sub-Saharan region;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Using 2008 Afrobarometer survey data, we examine the relationship between religion and subjective well-being (SWB) in Ghana, as well as religious group differences in their experiences of SWB. Two measures of religion—religious affiliation and religious importance, and two measures of SWB—absolute SWB (own perceived living conditions) and relative SWB (own living conditions compared to those of other Ghanaians) are employed in this study. Results show that religious affiliation is significantly related to both measures of SWB although associations depicted for such relationships were not strong. Religious importance significantly related to relative SWB only (with a weak-to-moderate association). Significant religious affiliation and religious importance group differences are found on both SWB outcomes via non-parametric test procedures (Kruskal–Wallis H test, followed by post hoc tests). On balance, the None/Traditional religious group experienced less favorable SWB than Other Christian, Evangelical/Pentecostal, and Muslim groups, especially for absolute SWB, while the None/Traditional group experienced particularly less favorable relative SWB than the Protestant group. Religious importance groups also significantly differed in such a way that the group that considered religion very important had more favorable experiences of both types of SWB than the group that considered religion not at all/not very important. Other significant differences on both outcomes are found among ethnic, educational, and regional groups. In view of the findings, the study contributes to SWB research and suggests policy implications.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 79
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Measuring well-being: A comparison of subjective well-being and PERMA
    Goodman, Fallon R.
    Disabato, David J.
    Kashdan, Todd B.
    Kauffman, Scott Barry
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 13 (04): : 321 - 332
  • [22] How Does More Attention to Subjective Well-Being Affect Subjective Well-Being?
    Ludwigs, Kai
    Lucas, Richard
    Burger, Martijn
    Veenhoven, Ruut
    Arends, Lidia
    [J]. APPLIED RESEARCH IN QUALITY OF LIFE, 2018, 13 (04) : 1055 - 1080
  • [23] How Does More Attention to Subjective Well-Being Affect Subjective Well-Being?
    Kai Ludwigs
    Richard Lucas
    Martijn Burger
    Ruut Veenhoven
    Lidia Arends
    [J]. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 2018, 13 : 1055 - 1080
  • [24] Religion, future orientation, and subjective well-being among emerging adults
    Desmond, Scott A.
    Kraus, Rachel
    [J]. MENTAL HEALTH RELIGION & CULTURE, 2023, 26 (10) : 957 - 968
  • [25] A Theory of Subjective Well-Being
    Hersch, Gil
    [J]. ECONOMICS AND PHILOSOPHY, 2023, 39 (03) : 528 - 532
  • [26] SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING IN AFRICA
    Botha, Ferdi
    Snowball, Jen
    [J]. AFRICAN REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE-AREF, 2015, 7 (01): : 1 - 5
  • [27] The science of subjective well-being
    Yates, Greg
    Price, Debbie
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ADULT LEARNING, 2009, 49 (01) : 214 - 218
  • [28] Weekends and Subjective Well-Being
    Helliwell, John F.
    Wang, Shun
    [J]. SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2014, 116 (02) : 389 - 407
  • [29] SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING AND EVENTS
    Yu, Nanyi Nicole
    Mair, Judith
    Lee, Andy
    Ong, Faith
    [J]. EVENT MANAGEMENT, 2022, 26 (01): : 7 - 24
  • [30] Subjective Well-Being and Policy
    Bruno S. Frey
    Jana Gallus
    [J]. Topoi, 2013, 32 : 207 - 212