Subjective Well-Being and Policy

被引:0
|
作者
Bruno S. Frey
Jana Gallus
机构
[1] University of Warwick,Warwick Business School
[2] Zeppelin University Friedrichshafen,undefined
[3] Center for Research in Economics,undefined
[4] Management and the Arts (CREMA),undefined
[5] University of Zurich,undefined
来源
Topoi | 2013年 / 32卷
关键词
Well-being; Happiness; Life satisfaction; Policy; Manipulation; Government;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper analyses whether the aggregation of individual happiness scores to a National Happiness Index can still be trusted once governments have proclaimed their main objective to be the pursuit—or even maximization—of this National Happiness Index. The answer to this investigation is clear-cut: as soon as the National Happiness Index has become a policy goal, it can no longer be trusted to reflect people’s true happiness. Rather, the Index will be systematically distorted due to the incentive for citizens to answer strategically and the incentive for government to manipulate the Index in its favour. Such a distortion would arise even if the measurement of subjective well-being correctly reflected actual happiness before the intervention of government. Governments in a democracy should establish the conditions enabling individuals to become happy. The valuable and important results of happiness research should be introduced into the political process. Each person should be free to pursue happiness according to his or her preferences. This process is supported by obedience to the rule of law, human rights and free media, as well as by extended political participation rights, decentralized public decision-making, an open and effective education system fostering upward mobility and the possibility to find suitable employment.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 212
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Subjective Well-Being and Policy
    Frey, Bruno S.
    Gallus, Jana
    [J]. TOPOI-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF PHILOSOPHY, 2013, 32 (02): : 207 - 212
  • [2] Cultural Policy and Subjective Well-Being in Mexico
    Soltero, Gonzalo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTS MANAGEMENT LAW AND SOCIETY, 2019, 49 (01): : 74 - 88
  • [3] Volunteering, subjective well-being and public policy
    Binder, Martin
    Freytag, Andreas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 34 : 97 - 119
  • [4] Climate Change Policy and Subjective Well-Being
    FitzRoy, Felix
    Franz-Vasdeki, Jennifer
    Papyrakis, Elissaios
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND GOVERNANCE, 2012, 22 (03) : 205 - 216
  • [5] SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING - COMPONENTS OF WELL-BEING
    GLATZER, W
    [J]. SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 1987, 19 (01) : 25 - 31
  • [6] Subjective well-being is essential to well-being
    Diener, E
    Sapyta, JJ
    Suh, E
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL INQUIRY, 1998, 9 (01) : 33 - 37
  • [7] Subjective Well-being in Greater China: Broadening the Framing of Citizen Well-being in Public Policy
    Tay, Stephen
    [J]. ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2013, 35 (01) : 71 - 92
  • [8] Subjective Well-Being and Retirement: Analysis and Policy Recommendations
    Horner, Elizabeth Mokyr
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAPPINESS STUDIES, 2014, 15 (01) : 125 - 144
  • [9] Defining and measuring subjective well-being for sport policy
    Testoni, Stefano
    Mansfield, Louise
    Dolan, Paul
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORT POLICY AND POLITICS, 2018, 10 (04) : 815 - 827
  • [10] Subjective Well-Being and Retirement: Analysis and Policy Recommendations
    Elizabeth Mokyr Horner
    [J]. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2014, 15 : 125 - 144