The Unity of Well-Being: An Inquiry into the Structure of Subjective Well-Being Using the Bifactor Model

被引:0
|
作者
Kaufman V.A. [1 ]
Horton C. [2 ]
Walsh L.C. [1 ]
Rodriguez A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Department of Psychology, University of California, 1285 Franz Hall, Box 951563, Los AngelesLos Angeles, 90095-1563, CA
[2] RAND Corporation, Boston, MA
关键词
Domain satisfaction; Happiness; Life satisfaction; Negative affect; Positive affect; Subjective well-being;
D O I
10.1007/s41042-022-00077-z
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In homage to the life and work of Ed Diener (1946–2021), the present study assessed the dimensions of the tripartite model (positive affect, negative affect, and life satisfaction) and two additional dimensions (domain satisfaction and happiness) to investigate the structure of subjective well-being using exploratory factor analysis and the bifactor model. Specifically, we tested whether these five dimensions belong to an essentially unidimensional subjective well-being construct. Towards this goal, we used a large, previously collected dataset closely matched to the U.S. census (N = 2,000, ages 18–65+ ; 52.4% female; 66.3% White; 14.9% Hispanic; 12% Black) and selected 24 items representing the five dimensions. Our results showed that all 24 items were internally consistent and highly correlated. Exploratory factor analyses revealed there were five underlying factors best characterizing the data. When fit to the bifactor model, a strong underlying general subjective well-being factor emerged. Additionally, general factor scores were highly reliable according to conventional reliability standards. A confirmatory factor analysis also supported the bifactor structure of subjective well-being. Overall, our findings suggest all 24 items from the five dimensions reflect one essentially unidimensional construct, which can be combined into a single subjective well-being score. Domain satisfaction and subjective happiness both belong to subjective well-being in the same way that the original three dimensions of life satisfaction, negative affect, and positive affect do. © 2022, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码:461 / 486
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An Intentional Model of Emotional Well-Being: The Development and Initial Validation of a Measure of Subjective Well-Being
    Ömer Faruk Şimşek
    [J]. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2011, 12 : 421 - 442
  • [22] A Theory of Subjective Well-Being
    Hersch, Gil
    [J]. ECONOMICS AND PHILOSOPHY, 2023, 39 (03) : 528 - 532
  • [23] Weekends and Subjective Well-Being
    Helliwell, John F.
    Wang, Shun
    [J]. SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2014, 116 (02) : 389 - 407
  • [24] The science of subjective well-being
    Yates, Greg
    Price, Debbie
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ADULT LEARNING, 2009, 49 (01) : 214 - 218
  • [25] SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING IN AFRICA
    Botha, Ferdi
    Snowball, Jen
    [J]. AFRICAN REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE-AREF, 2015, 7 (01): : 1 - 5
  • [26] Innovativeness and Subjective Well-Being
    Martin Binder
    [J]. Social Indicators Research, 2013, 111 : 561 - 578
  • [27] Subjective Well-Being and Policy
    Bruno S. Frey
    Jana Gallus
    [J]. Topoi, 2013, 32 : 207 - 212
  • [28] SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING AND EVENTS
    Yu, Nanyi Nicole
    Mair, Judith
    Lee, Andy
    Ong, Faith
    [J]. EVENT MANAGEMENT, 2022, 26 (01): : 7 - 24
  • [29] Retirement and subjective well-being
    Bonsang, Eric
    Klein, Tobias J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2012, 83 (03) : 311 - 329
  • [30] Subjective Well-Being of Orphans
    Dahlan, Tina Hayati
    Wyandini, Diah Zaleha
    Hasanah, Viena Rusmiati
    [J]. ADVANCED SCIENCE LETTERS, 2019, 25 (01) : 216 - 220