Short-interval lower-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide as induction and maintenance therapy for lupus nephritis: a prospective observational study

被引:0
|
作者
X. W. Zhang
Chun Li
X. X. Ma
J. X. Zhao
Yuan An
Shuang Liu
Yan Li
Z. G. Li
机构
[1] Peking University People’s Hospital,Department of Rheumatology and Immunology
[2] Peking University Third Hospital,Department of Rheumatology and Immunology
来源
Clinical Rheumatology | 2014年 / 33卷
关键词
Cyclophosphamide; Lupus nephritis; Menstrual disturbance;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Cyclophosphamide (CYC) has long been considered a gold standard in inducing renal remission and preventing renal flares for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, the rational use of CYC has not reached a consensus, such as the timing and length of treatment, the route of administration, and the ideal dosage. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of short-interval lower-dose (SILD) intravenous (IV) CYC in the treatment of SLE. A total of 225 patients with lupus nephritis were randomly assigned to a 1-year trial, either the SILD group (12 fortnightly pulses at a fixed dose of 400 mg followed by 6 monthly pulses) or high-dose (HD) group (6 monthly pulses followed by two quarterly pulses at a dose of 0.5~1.0 g/m2). At 6 months of treatment, 28 % (30/107) of patients in the SILD group reached a complete remission (CR), and 51.4 % (55/107) were in partial remission (PR), as compared with 32.7 % (35/107) and 45.8 % (49/107) in the HD group, respectively. Serum albumin, 24-h urinary protein, and the scores of disease activity were significantly improved in both groups at 6 months and maintained at the end of clinical trial. However, the SILD group showed much less menstrual disturbances (11.5 %), gastrointestinal adverse effects (5.3 %), and leukopenia (9.7 %) than the HD group (28.6, 26.8, and 19.8 %, respectively) at the end of clinical trial. The efficacy of the short-interval lower-dose (SILD) IV CYC regimen in the treatment of lupus nephritis is equivalent to that of the high-dose (HD) regimen, whereas the incidence of adverse events is much lower in the SILD group.
引用
收藏
页码:939 / 945
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comment on: Efficacy and Safety of Mycophenolate Mofetil versus Intravenous Pulse Cyclophosphamide as Induction Therapy in Proliferative Lupus Nephritis
    Ziaie, Shadi
    Moradi, Omid
    Saffaei, Ali
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2019, 13 (05) : 347 - 347
  • [32] A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Remission Induction with Modified Multitarget Therapy with Intravenous Cyclophosphamide in Proliferative Lupus Nephritis
    Pal, Atanu
    Chaudhury, Arpita Ray
    Bhunia, Abhirup
    Bhattacharya, Koushik
    Chatterjee, Suparna
    Divyaveer, Smita Subhash
    Sircar, Dipankar
    Sen, Debabrata
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF NEPHROLOGY, 2023, 33 (05) : 340 - 347
  • [33] Randomized controlled trial of pulse intravenous cyclophosphamide versus mycophenolate mofetil in the induction therapy of proliferative lupus nephritis
    Ong, LM
    Hooi, LS
    Lim, TO
    Goh, BL
    Ahmad, G
    Ghazalli, R
    Teo, SM
    Wong, HS
    Tan, SY
    Shaariah, W
    Tan, CC
    Morad, Z
    NEPHROLOGY, 2005, 10 (05) : 504 - 510
  • [34] Lupus nephritis: Sequential therapy with short-term intravenous cyclophosphamide followed by maintenance oral mycophenolate mofetil or oral azathioprine is more efficacious and safer than long-term intravenous cyclophosphamide
    Contreras, G
    Pardo, V
    Leclercq, B
    Lenz, O
    ONan, P
    Tozman, E
    Roth, D
    Rogers, T
    Iqbal, K
    Tawakol, J
    Cuellar, M
    Khan, T
    Schulman, I
    Vemuri, N
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2003, 14 : 38A - 38A
  • [35] Mycophenolate mofetil versus intravenous cyclophosphamide for induction treatment of proliferative lupus nephritis in a Japanese population: a retrospective study
    Onishi, Akira
    Sugiyama, Daisuke
    Tsuji, Go
    Nakazawa, Takashi
    Kogata, Yoshinori
    Tsuda, Kosaku
    Naka, Ikuko
    Nishimura, Keisuke
    Misaki, Kenta
    Kurimoto, Chiyo
    Hayashi, Hiroki
    Kageyama, Goichi
    Saegusa, Jun
    Sugimoto, Takeshi
    Kawano, Seiji
    Kumagai, Shunichi
    Morinobu, Akio
    MODERN RHEUMATOLOGY, 2013, 23 (01) : 89 - 96
  • [36] LOW DOSE PULSE IV METHYLPREDNISOLONE AS INDUCTION THERAPY FOR LUPUS NEPHRITIS: A PRELIMINARY STUDY
    Fasano, S.
    Falcone, L. Gabriele
    La Montagna, G.
    Valentini, G.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2014, 73 : 971 - 972
  • [37] A pharmacoeconomic study comparing the use of mycophenolate mofetil or cyclophosphamide as induction therapy in lupus nephritis patients in Egypt
    Khattab, Nada M.
    Abbassi, Maggie
    Raafat, Hala A.
    Farid, Samar
    LUPUS, 2022, 31 (04) : 505 - 516
  • [38] Low dose mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclophosphamide in the induction therapy of lupus nephritis in Nepalese population: a randomized control trial
    Sedhain, Arun
    Hada, Rajani
    Agrawal, Rajendra K.
    Bhattarai, Gandhi R.
    Baral, Anil
    BMC NEPHROLOGY, 2018, 19
  • [39] Low dose mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclophosphamide in the induction therapy of lupus nephritis in Nepalese population: a randomized control trial
    Arun Sedhain
    Rajani Hada
    Rajendra K. Agrawal
    Gandhi R. Bhattarai
    Anil Baral
    BMC Nephrology, 19
  • [40] Comparing the efficacy of low-dose vs high-dose cyclophosphamide regimen as induction therapy in the treatment of proliferative lupus nephritis: a single center study
    Mehra, Sonal
    Usdadiya, Jignesh B.
    Jain, Vikramraj K.
    Misra, Durga Prasanna
    Negi, Vir Singh
    RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 38 (04) : 557 - 568