Randomized controlled trial of pulse intravenous cyclophosphamide versus mycophenolate mofetil in the induction therapy of proliferative lupus nephritis

被引:193
|
作者
Ong, LM
Hooi, LS [1 ]
Lim, TO
Goh, BL
Ahmad, G
Ghazalli, R
Teo, SM
Wong, HS
Tan, SY
Shaariah, W
Tan, CC
Morad, Z
机构
[1] Sultanah Aminah Hosp, Haemodialysis Unit, Johor Baharu 80100, Malaysia
[2] Penang Hosp, Dept Med, George Town, Malaysia
[3] Kuala Lumpur Hosp, Clin Res Ctr, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
[4] Selayang Hosp, Dept Nephrol, Selangor, Malaysia
[5] Ipoh Hosp, Hemodialysis Unit, Ipoh, Malaysia
[6] Kuala Lumpur Hosp, Dept Nephrol, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
[7] Univ Malaya, Med Ctr, Dept Renal Med, Kuala Lumpur 59100, Malaysia
[8] Seremban Hosp, Hemodialysis Unit, Seremban, Malaysia
关键词
intravenous cyclophosphamide; mycophenolate mofetil; proliferative lupus nephritis; randomized controlled trial;
D O I
10.1111/j.1440-1797.2005.00444.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil in the induction therapy of proliferative lupus nephritis. Methods: Forty-four patients from eight centres with newly diagnosed lupus nephritis World Health Organization class III or IV were randomly assigned to either mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 2 g/day for 6 months or intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVC) 0.75-1 g/m(2) monthly for 6 months in addition to corticosteroids. Results: Remission occurred in 13 out of 25 patients (52%) in the IVC group and 11 out of 19 patients (58%) in the MMF group (P = 0.70). There were 12% in the IVC group and 26% in the MMF group that achieved complete remission (P = 0.22). Improvements in haemoglobin, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate, serum albumin, serum complement, proteinuria, urinary activity, renal function and the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index score were similar in both groups. Twenty-four follow-up renal biopsies at the end of therapy showed a significant reduction in the activity score in both groups. The chronicity index increased in both groups but was only significant in the IVC group. Adverse events were similar. Major infections occurred in three patients in each group. There was no difference in gastrointestinal side-effects. Conclusions: MMF in combination with corticosteroids is an effective induction therapy for moderately severe proliferative lupus nephritis.
引用
收藏
页码:504 / 510
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF PULSE INTRAVENOUS CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE VERSUS MYCOPHENOLATE MOFETIL IN THE INDUCTION THERAPY OF PROLIFERATIVE LUPUS NEPHRITIS
    Ong, Loke Meng
    Hooi, Lai Seong
    Lim, Teck Onn
    Goh, Bak Leong
    Ahmad, Ghazali
    Ghazalli, Rozina
    Teo, Sue Mei
    Wong, Hin Seng
    Tan, Si Yen
    Shaariah, Wan
    Tan, Chwee Choon
    Morad, Zaki
    [J]. NEPHROLOGY, 2005, 10 : A121 - A121
  • [2] Efficacy and Safety of Mycophenolate Mofetil Versus Intravenous Pulse Cyclophosphamide as Induction Therapy in Proliferative Lupus Nephritis
    Gadakchi, Leyla
    Hajialilo, Mehrzad
    Nakhjavani, Mohammad-Reza
    Azar, Sima Abedi
    Kolahi, Sousan
    Gojazadeh, Morteza
    Ebrahimi, Ali-asghar
    Mahdavi, Aida Malek
    Noshad, Hamid
    Khabbazi, Alireza
    [J]. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2018, 12 (05) : 288 - 292
  • [3] Comment on: Efficacy and Safety of Mycophenolate Mofetil versus Intravenous Pulse Cyclophosphamide as Induction Therapy in Proliferative Lupus Nephritis
    Ziaie, Shadi
    Moradi, Omid
    Saffaei, Ali
    [J]. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2019, 13 (05) : 347 - 347
  • [4] Is mycophenolate mofetil superior to pulse intravenous cyclophosphamide for induction therapy of proliferative lupus nephritis in Egyptian patients?
    Eid M. El-Shafey
    Said H. Abdou
    Mohamed M. Shareef
    [J]. Clinical and Experimental Nephrology, 2010, 14 : 214 - 221
  • [5] Is mycophenolate mofetil superior to pulse intravenous cyclophosphamide for induction therapy of proliferative lupus nephritis in Egyptian patients?
    El-Shafey, Eid M.
    Abdou, Said H.
    Shareef, Mohamed M.
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEPHROLOGY, 2010, 14 (03) : 214 - 221
  • [6] Induction Therapy for Pediatric Focal Proliferative Lupus Nephritis: Cyclophosphamide Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil
    Lau, Keith K.
    Ault, Bettina H.
    Jones, Deborah P.
    Butani, Lavjay
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC HEALTH CARE, 2008, 22 (05) : 282 - 288
  • [7] Mycophenolate mofetil compared with intravenous cyclophosphamide as induction treatment for pediatric lupus nephritis: A randomized trial
    Sundel, Robert P.
    Lisk, Laura
    [J]. ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2008, 58 (09): : S632 - S633
  • [8] Induction therapy for active lupus nephritis: mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclophosphamide
    Christian Burchardi
    Detlef Schlöndorff
    [J]. Nature Clinical Practice Nephrology, 2006, 2 : 314 - 315
  • [9] RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF LOW-DOSE INTRAVENOUS CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE VERSUS ORAL MYCOPHENOLATE MOFETIL IN TREATMENT OF LUPUS NEPHRITIS
    Rathi, Manish
    Goyal, Ajay
    Gupta, Pramod K.
    Jaryal, Ajay
    Sharma, Aman
    Jha, Vivekanand
    Ramachandran, Raja
    Kumar, Vivek
    Kohli, Harbir Singh
    Gupta, Krishan Lal
    Sakhuja, Vinay
    [J]. NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 29 : 28 - 29
  • [10] Mycophenolate mofetil versus intravenous cyclophosphamide for induction treatment of proliferative lupus nephritis in a Japanese population: a retrospective study
    Onishi, Akira
    Sugiyama, Daisuke
    Tsuji, Go
    Nakazawa, Takashi
    Kogata, Yoshinori
    Tsuda, Kosaku
    Naka, Ikuko
    Nishimura, Keisuke
    Misaki, Kenta
    Kurimoto, Chiyo
    Hayashi, Hiroki
    Kageyama, Goichi
    Saegusa, Jun
    Sugimoto, Takeshi
    Kawano, Seiji
    Kumagai, Shunichi
    Morinobu, Akio
    [J]. MODERN RHEUMATOLOGY, 2013, 23 (01) : 89 - 96