Locus of semantic interference in picture-word interference tasks

被引:0
|
作者
Markus F. Damian
Jeffrey S. Bowers
机构
[1] University of Bristol,Department of Experimental Psychology
来源
关键词
Stimulus Onset Asynchrony; Congruity Effect; Speech Production; Picture Naming; Naming Response;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Picture#x2014;word interference studies typically show that semantically related distractor words embedded within a picture slow picture-naming responses, relative to unrelated ones. This semantic interference effect is commonly interpreted as arising from the competition of lexical#x2014;semantic (e.g., Schriefers, Meyer, & Levelt, 1990) or lexical#x2014;phonological (e.g., Starreveld & La Heij, 1996) codes. The experiment reported here tests a crucial assumption shared by these accounts#x2014;namely, that the effect reflects a lexical, rather than a nonverbal, conceptual conflict. Pictures were named while participants attempted to ignore embedded distractors that were in either verbal or pictorial format. The presence of both words and pictures substantially interfered with naming responses, but only words, not pictures, were found to induce semantic interference. These findings support the claim that for semantic interference to arise, both target picture and distractor have to be lexicalized. Consequently, a general conceptual locus of the effect can be excluded, and the claim that semantic interference is based on a lexical conflict is confirmed.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 117
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Distinguishing Target From Distractor in Stroop, Picture-Word, and Word-Word Interference Tasks
    Schmalz, Xenia
    Treccani, Barbara
    Mulatti, Claudio
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 6
  • [22] Electrophysiological characterization of facilitation and interference in the picture-word interference paradigm
    Buerki, Audrey
    [J]. PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 54 (09) : 1370 - 1392
  • [23] The word class effect in the picture-word interference paradigm
    Janssen, Niels
    Melinger, Alissa
    Mahon, Bradford Z.
    Finkbeiner, Matthew
    Caramazza, Alfonso
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 63 (06): : 1233 - 1246
  • [24] Age of acquisition, word frequency, and picture-word interference
    Catling, Jonathan C.
    Dent, Kevin
    Johnston, Robert A.
    Balding, Richard
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 63 (07): : 1304 - 1317
  • [25] Distractor frequency effects in picture-word interference tasks with vocal and manual responses
    Hutson, James
    Damian, Markus F.
    Spalek, Katharina
    [J]. LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES, 2013, 28 (05): : 615 - 632
  • [26] The picture-word interference effect is not a Stroop effect
    R. Dell’Acqua
    R. Job
    F. Peressotti
    A. Pascali
    [J]. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2007, 14 : 717 - 722
  • [27] Picture-word interference effects on naming in Chinese
    Weekes, B
    Davies, R
    Chen, MJ
    [J]. COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE STUDIES OF THE CHINESE LANGUAGE, 2002, : 101 - 127
  • [28] The picture-word interference effect is not a Stroop effect
    Dell'Acqua, R.
    Job, R.
    Peressotti, F.
    Pascali, A.
    [J]. PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2007, 14 (04) : 717 - 722
  • [29] Neurodynamical approach to the picture-word interference effect
    Koepke, Franziska
    Loh, Marco
    Costa, Albert
    Deco, Gustavo
    [J]. NEUROCOMPUTING, 2006, 69 (10-12) : 1317 - 1321
  • [30] Picture-word interference and the response exclusion hypothesis
    Mulatti, Claudio
    Coltheart, Max
    [J]. CORTEX, 2012, 48 (03) : 363 - 372