Distinguishing Target From Distractor in Stroop, Picture-Word, and Word-Word Interference Tasks

被引:1
|
作者
Schmalz, Xenia [1 ,2 ]
Treccani, Barbara [3 ]
Mulatti, Claudio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Dipartimento Psicol Sviluppo & Socializzaz, Padua, Italy
[2] Macquarie Univ, ARC Ctr Excellence Cognit & Disorders, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
[3] Univ Sassari, Dipartimento Storia Sci Uomo & Formaz, I-07100 Sassari, Italy
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2015年 / 6卷
关键词
word-word interference; picture-word interference; Stroop test; lexical selection by competition; mental lexicon; selective attention; LEXICAL SELECTION; SPEECH PRODUCTION; COMPETITION; MODEL; RECOGNITION; INFORMATION; ATTENTION; ACCOUNT; ACCESS; MEMORY;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01858
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Lexical selection both during reading aloud and speech production involves selecting an intended word, while ignoring irrelevant lexical activation. This process has been studied by the use of interference tasks. Examples are the Stroop task, where participants ignore the written color word and name the color of the ink, picture word interference tasks, where participants name a picture while ignoring a super-imposed written word, or word word interference (WWI) tasks, where two words are presented and the participants need to respond to only one, based on an pre-determined visual feature (e.g., color, position). Here, we focus on the WWI task: it is theoretically impossible for existing models to explain how the cognitive system can respond to one stimulus and block the other, when they are presented by the same modality (i.e., they are both words). We describe a solution that can explain performance on the WWI task: drawing on the literature on visual attention, we propose that the system creates an object file for each perceived object, which is continuously updated with increasingly complete information about the stimulus, such as the task relevant visual feature. Such a model can account for performance on all three tasks.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The picture-word interference effect is not a Stroop effect
    R. Dell’Acqua
    R. Job
    F. Peressotti
    A. Pascali
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2007, 14 : 717 - 722
  • [2] The picture-word interference effect is not a Stroop effect
    Dell'Acqua, R.
    Job, R.
    Peressotti, F.
    Pascali, A.
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2007, 14 (04) : 717 - 722
  • [3] INTERFERENCE EFFECTS IN THE PICTURE-WORD STROOP TASK
    TOMA, RJ
    TSAO, YC
    PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1985, 61 (01) : 223 - 228
  • [4] Distractor frequency effects in picture-word interference tasks with vocal and manual responses
    Hutson, James
    Damian, Markus F.
    Spalek, Katharina
    LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES, 2013, 28 (05): : 615 - 632
  • [5] Locus of semantic interference in picture-word interference tasks
    Markus F. Damian
    Jeffrey S. Bowers
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2003, 10 : 111 - 117
  • [6] Locus of semantic interference in picture-word interference tasks
    Damian, MF
    Bowers, JS
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2003, 10 (01) : 111 - 117
  • [7] Stroop and picture-word interference are two sides of the same coin
    van Maanen, Leendert
    van Rijn, Hedderik
    Borst, Jelmer P.
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2009, 16 (06) : 987 - 999
  • [8] AUDITORY-VISUAL STROOP INTERFERENCE IN PICTURE-WORD PROCESSING
    ISHIO, A
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 61 (05): : 329 - 335
  • [9] Relative speed of processing affects interference in Stroop and picture-word interference paradigms: evidence from the distractor frequency effect
    Geng, Jingyi
    Schnur, Tatiana T.
    Janssen, Niels
    LANGUAGE COGNITION AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 29 (09) : 1100 - 1114
  • [10] The word class effect in the picture-word interference paradigm
    Janssen, Niels
    Melinger, Alissa
    Mahon, Bradford Z.
    Finkbeiner, Matthew
    Caramazza, Alfonso
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 63 (06): : 1233 - 1246