Joint contributions of preview and task instructions on visual search strategy selection

被引:2
|
作者
Zhang, Tianyu [1 ]
Irons, Jessica L. [2 ]
Hansen, Heather A. [1 ]
Leber, Andrew B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Psychol, 225 Psychol Bldg,1835 Neil Ave, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] CSIRO, Data61, Eveleigh, Australia
关键词
Attentional control; Visual search; Strategy; Individual differences; COGNITIVE CONTROL; GUIDANCE; TIME;
D O I
10.3758/s13414-024-02870-1
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
People tend to employ suboptimal attention control strategies during visual search. Here we question why people are suboptimal, specifically investigating how knowledge of the optimal strategies and the time available to apply such strategies affect strategy use. We used the Adaptive Choice Visual Search (ACVS), a task designed to assess attentional control optimality. We used explicit strategy instructions to manipulate explicit strategy knowledge, and we used display previews to manipulate time to apply the strategies. In the first two experiments, the strategy instructions increased optimality. However, the preview manipulation did not significantly boost optimality for participants who did not receive strategy instruction. Finally, in Experiments 3A and 3B, we jointly manipulated preview and instruction with a larger sample size. Preview and instruction both produced significant main effects; furthermore, they interacted significantly, such that the beneficial effect of instructions emerged with greater preview time. Taken together, these results have important implications for understanding the strategic use of attentional control. Individuals with explicit knowledge of the optimal strategy are more likely to exploit relevant information in their visual environment, but only to the extent that they have the time to do so.
引用
收藏
页码:1163 / 1175
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] AN INFORMATIONAL ANALYSIS OF A VISUAL SEARCH TASK
    MEUDELL, PR
    WHISTON, TG
    PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1970, 7 (04): : 212 - &
  • [42] Configural asymmetries in a visual search task
    Monnier, Patrick
    Attarha, Mouna
    Edler, Joshua R.
    Birks, David
    VISUAL COGNITION, 2010, 18 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [43] Stimulus segmentation in the visual search task
    Cesar Galera
    Ederaldo José Lopes
    Michael von Grünau
    Perception & Psychophysics, 2000, 62 : 505 - 516
  • [44] Stimulus segmentation in the visual search task
    Galera, C
    Lopes, EJ
    von Grünau, M
    PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2000, 62 (03): : 505 - 516
  • [45] TMS effect on visual search task
    Ge, Sheng
    Matsuoka, Akira
    Ueno, Shoogo
    Iramina, Keiji
    2006 28TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-15, 2006, : 4224 - +
  • [46] Eyewitness Identification Is a Visual Search Task
    Wixted, John T.
    Vul, Edward
    Mickes, Laura
    Wilson, Brent M.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF VISION SCIENCE, VOL 7, 2021, 2021, 7 : 519 - 541
  • [47] INFLUENCE OF STIMULUS UNCERTAINTY AND EXPERIMENTAL INSTRUCTIONS ON VISUAL SELECTION
    FAW, TT
    NUNNALLY, JC
    ATOR, NA
    PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1969, 5 (03): : 137 - &
  • [48] THE EFFECTS OF INSTRUCTIONS AND A DISTRACTING VISUAL TASK ON HABITUATION TO LOUD TONES
    IACONO, WG
    LYKKEN, DT
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1982, 19 (05) : 565 - 565
  • [49] Negative Priming in a Joint Selection Task
    Welsh, Timothy N.
    McDougall, Laura M.
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (08):
  • [50] The capacity limitations of multiple-template visual search during task preparation and target selection
    Grubert, Anna
    Wang, Ziyi
    Williams, Ella
    Jimenez, Mikel
    Remington, Roger
    Eimer, Martin
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2025, 62 (01)