Joint contributions of preview and task instructions on visual search strategy selection

被引:2
|
作者
Zhang, Tianyu [1 ]
Irons, Jessica L. [2 ]
Hansen, Heather A. [1 ]
Leber, Andrew B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Psychol, 225 Psychol Bldg,1835 Neil Ave, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] CSIRO, Data61, Eveleigh, Australia
关键词
Attentional control; Visual search; Strategy; Individual differences; COGNITIVE CONTROL; GUIDANCE; TIME;
D O I
10.3758/s13414-024-02870-1
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
People tend to employ suboptimal attention control strategies during visual search. Here we question why people are suboptimal, specifically investigating how knowledge of the optimal strategies and the time available to apply such strategies affect strategy use. We used the Adaptive Choice Visual Search (ACVS), a task designed to assess attentional control optimality. We used explicit strategy instructions to manipulate explicit strategy knowledge, and we used display previews to manipulate time to apply the strategies. In the first two experiments, the strategy instructions increased optimality. However, the preview manipulation did not significantly boost optimality for participants who did not receive strategy instruction. Finally, in Experiments 3A and 3B, we jointly manipulated preview and instruction with a larger sample size. Preview and instruction both produced significant main effects; furthermore, they interacted significantly, such that the beneficial effect of instructions emerged with greater preview time. Taken together, these results have important implications for understanding the strategic use of attentional control. Individuals with explicit knowledge of the optimal strategy are more likely to exploit relevant information in their visual environment, but only to the extent that they have the time to do so.
引用
收藏
页码:1163 / 1175
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Occluded information is restored at preview but not during visual search
    Alexander, Robert G.
    Zelinsky, Gregory J.
    JOURNAL OF VISION, 2018, 18 (11): : 1 - 16
  • [22] Visual marking: The effects of irrelevant changes on preview search
    Derrick G. Watson
    Glyn W. Humphreys
    Perception & Psychophysics, 2005, 67 : 418 - 434
  • [23] Visual search in spatial neglect studied with a preview paradigm
    Fellrath, Julia
    Blanche-Durbec, Vanessa
    Schnider, Armin
    Jacquemoud, Anne-Sophie
    Ptak, Radek
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 6
  • [24] Visual marking: The effects of irrelevant changes on preview search
    Watson, DG
    Humphreys, GW
    PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2005, 67 (03): : 418 - 434
  • [25] Temporal attention aids the selection of targets in a visual search task: An ERP study
    Rolke, Bettina
    Seibold, Verena Carola
    PERCEPTION, 2016, 45 : 106 - 106
  • [26] GROUP PERFORMANCE IN A VISUAL SIGNAL-DETECTION TASK AS A FUNCTION OF SEARCH STRATEGY
    CLEMENT, DE
    BULLETIN OF THE PSYCHONOMIC SOCIETY, 1974, 4 (NA4) : 241 - 241
  • [27] VISUAL AND ACOUSTIC CONFUSABILITY IN A VISUAL SEARCH TASK
    KAPLAN, GA
    YONAS, A
    SHURCLIFF, A
    PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1966, 1 (06): : 172 - 174
  • [28] The selection process in the visual search task: sub-set selection based on depth and size.
    Galera, C
    von Grunau, MW
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2001, 42 (04) : S866 - S866
  • [29] INSTRUCTIONS, STRATEGIES, AND PATTERN UNCERTAINTY IN A VISUAL DISCRIMINATION TASK
    CLEMENT, DE
    WEIMAN, CFR
    PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1970, 7 (06): : 333 - &
  • [30] The effects of spatial auditory preview on dynamic visual search performance
    Elias, B
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS SOCIETY - 40TH ANNUAL MEETING, VOLS 1 AND 2: HUMAN CENTERED TECHNOLOGY - KEY TO THE FUTURE, 1996, : 1227 - 1231