Machine learning interpretability meets TLS fingerprinting

被引:0
|
作者
Mahdi Jafari Siavoshani
Amirhossein Khajehpour
Amirmohammad Ziaei Bideh
Amirali Gatmiri
Ali Taheri
机构
[1] Sharif University of Technology,Information, Network, and Learning Lab (INL) Computer Science and Engineering Department
来源
Soft Computing | 2023年 / 27卷
关键词
Web fingerprinting; Transport layer security (TLS); Information leakage; Deep learning; Model interpretation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Protecting users’ privacy over the Internet is of great importance; however, it becomes harder and harder to maintain due to the increasing complexity of network protocols and components. Therefore, investigating and understanding how data are leaked from the information transmission platforms and protocols can lead us to a more secure environment. In this paper, we propose a framework to systematically find the most vulnerable information fields in a network protocol. To this end, focusing on the transport layer security (TLS) protocol, we perform different machine-learning-based fingerprinting attacks on the collected data from more than 70 domains (websites) to understand how and where this information leakage occurs in the TLS protocol. Then, by employing the interpretation techniques developed in the machine learning community and applying our framework, we find the most vulnerable information fields in the TLS protocol. Our findings demonstrate that the TLS handshake (which is mainly unencrypted), the TLS record length appearing in the TLS application data header, and the IV field are among the most critical leaker parts in this protocol, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:7191 / 7208
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Advancing interpretability of machine-learning prediction models
    Trenary, Laurie
    DelSole, Timothy
    ENVIRONMENTAL DATA SCIENCE, 2022, 1
  • [32] Can Omics Help in Prognostic Machine Learning Interpretability?
    Uche, C. Z.
    Caruana, R.
    Lee, S. H.
    Geng, H.
    Wright, C. M.
    Xiao, Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2021, 111 (03): : E124 - E125
  • [33] Survey on Techniques, Applications and Security of Machine Learning Interpretability
    Ji S.
    Li J.
    Du T.
    Li B.
    Jisuanji Yanjiu yu Fazhan/Computer Research and Development, 2019, 56 (10): : 2071 - 2096
  • [34] Machine Learning Reimagined: The Promise of Interpretability to Combat Bias
    Maurer, Lydia R.
    Bertsimas, Dimitris
    Kaafarani, Haytham M. A.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2022, 275 (06) : E738 - E739
  • [35] Blockchain meets machine learning: a survey
    Kayikci, Safak
    Khoshgoftaar, Taghi M.
    JOURNAL OF BIG DATA, 2024, 11 (01)
  • [36] Machine learning meets genome assembly
    de Souza, Kleber Padovani
    Setubal, Joao Carlos
    de Carvalho, Andre Carlos Ponce de Leon F.
    Oliveira, Guilherme
    Chateau, Annie
    Alves, Ronnie
    BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS, 2019, 20 (06) : 2116 - 2129
  • [37] Quantum Chemistry Meets Machine Learning
    Fabrizio, Alberto
    Meyer, Benjamin
    Fabregat, Raimon
    Corminboeuf, Clemence
    CHIMIA, 2019, 73 (12) : 983 - 989
  • [38] Infrared spectroscopy meets machine learning
    Murphy, Justine
    LASER FOCUS WORLD, 2024, 60 (10): : 13 - 15
  • [39] Machine Learning meets Kalman Filtering
    Carron, Andrea
    Todescato, Marco
    Carli, Ruggero
    Schenato, Luca
    Pillonetto, Gianluigi
    2016 IEEE 55TH CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC), 2016, : 4594 - 4599
  • [40] Molecular Simulation Meets Machine Learning
    Sadus, Richard
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL AND ENGINEERING DATA, 2023, 69 (01): : 3 - 11