Principles of confounder selection

被引:0
|
作者
Tyler J. VanderWeele
机构
[1] Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health,Department of Epidemiology
来源
关键词
Confounder; Causal inference; Collider; Covariate adjustment; Selection;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Selecting an appropriate set of confounders for which to control is critical for reliable causal inference. Recent theoretical and methodological developments have helped clarify a number of principles of confounder selection. When complete knowledge of a causal diagram relating all covariates to each other is available, graphical rules can be used to make decisions about covariate control. Unfortunately, such complete knowledge is often unavailable. This paper puts forward a practical approach to confounder selection decisions when the somewhat less stringent assumption is made that knowledge is available for each covariate whether it is a cause of the exposure, and whether it is a cause of the outcome. Based on recent theoretically justified developments in the causal inference literature, the following proposal is made for covariate control decisions: control for each covariate that is a cause of the exposure, or of the outcome, or of both; exclude from this set any variable known to be an instrumental variable; and include as a covariate any proxy for an unmeasured variable that is a common cause of both the exposure and the outcome. Various principles of confounder selection are then further related to statistical covariate selection methods.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 219
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Model-free latent confounder-adjusted feature selection with FDR control
    Xiao, Jian
    Li, Shaoting
    Chen, Jun
    Zhu, Wensheng
    COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2025, 205
  • [32] Rejoinder to Discussions on: Data-driven confounder selection via Markov and Bayesian networks
    Haeggstroem, Jenny
    BIOMETRICS, 2018, 74 (02) : 407 - 410
  • [33] Consistent causal effect estimation under dual misspecification and implications for confounder selection procedures
    Gruber, Susan
    van der Laan, Mark J.
    STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2015, 24 (06) : 1003 - 1008
  • [34] The impact of confounder selection in propensity scores when applied to prospective cohort studies in pregnancy
    Xu, Ronghui
    Hou, Jue
    Chambers, Christina D.
    REPRODUCTIVE TOXICOLOGY, 2018, 78 : 75 - 80
  • [35] ON THE DEFINITION OF A CONFOUNDER
    Vanderweele, Tyler J.
    Shpitser, Ilya
    ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 2013, 41 (01): : 196 - 220
  • [36] The Impact of Confounder Selection in Propensity Scores for Rare Events Data - With Applications to Birth Defects
    Xu, Ronghui
    Hou, Jue
    Chambers, Christina
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2017, 26 : 87 - 87
  • [37] Built-in selection or confounder bias? Dynamic Landmarking in matched propensity score analyses
    Strobel, Alexandra
    Wienke, Andreas
    Gummert, Jan
    Bleiziffer, Sabine
    Kuss, Oliver
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [38] SELECTION PRINCIPLES AND BAIRE SPACES
    Scheepers, Marion
    MATEMATICKI VESNIK, 2009, 61 (03): : 195 - 202
  • [39] Projective versions of selection principles
    Bonanzinga, Maddalena
    Cammaroto, Filippo
    Matveev, Mikhail
    TOPOLOGY AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2010, 157 (05) : 874 - 893
  • [40] Selection principles and bitopological hyperspaces
    Osipov, Alexander V.
    APPLIED GENERAL TOPOLOGY, 2023, 24 (01): : 1 - 8