Principles of confounder selection

被引:0
|
作者
Tyler J. VanderWeele
机构
[1] Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health,Department of Epidemiology
来源
关键词
Confounder; Causal inference; Collider; Covariate adjustment; Selection;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Selecting an appropriate set of confounders for which to control is critical for reliable causal inference. Recent theoretical and methodological developments have helped clarify a number of principles of confounder selection. When complete knowledge of a causal diagram relating all covariates to each other is available, graphical rules can be used to make decisions about covariate control. Unfortunately, such complete knowledge is often unavailable. This paper puts forward a practical approach to confounder selection decisions when the somewhat less stringent assumption is made that knowledge is available for each covariate whether it is a cause of the exposure, and whether it is a cause of the outcome. Based on recent theoretically justified developments in the causal inference literature, the following proposal is made for covariate control decisions: control for each covariate that is a cause of the exposure, or of the outcome, or of both; exclude from this set any variable known to be an instrumental variable; and include as a covariate any proxy for an unmeasured variable that is a common cause of both the exposure and the outcome. Various principles of confounder selection are then further related to statistical covariate selection methods.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 219
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Model selection, confounder control, and marginal structural models: Review and new applications
    Joffe, MM
    Ten Have, TR
    Feldman, HI
    Kimmel, SE
    AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 2004, 58 (04): : 272 - 279
  • [22] Confounder Selection and Sensitivity Analyses to Unmeasured Confounding from Epidemiological and Statistical Perspectives
    Inoue, Kosuke
    Sakamaki, Kentaro
    Komukai, Sho
    Ito, Yuri
    Goto, Atsushi
    Shinozaki, Tomohiro
    JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2025, 35 (01) : 3 - 10
  • [23] Testing the Robustness of Background Knowledge Confounder Selection in a Case-Control Study
    Kahlert, Johnny
    Thomsen, Reimar W.
    Pedersen, Lars
    Madsen, Morten
    Moller, Niels
    Beck-Nielsen, Henning
    Sorensen, Henrik T.
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2014, 23 : 96 - 97
  • [24] Bias testing, bias correction, and confounder selection using an instrumental variable model
    Choi, Byeong Yeob
    Fine, Jason P.
    Brookhart, M. Alan
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2020, 39 (29) : 4386 - 4404
  • [25] Confounder selection in environmental epidemiology: Assessment of health effects of prenatal mercury exposure
    Budtz-Jorgensen, Esben
    Keiding, Niels
    Grandjean, Philippe
    Weihe, Pal
    ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2007, 17 (01) : 27 - 35
  • [26] PRINCIPLES OF CLOTHING SELECTION
    不详
    EDUCATION, 1931, 51 (06): : 382 - 382
  • [27] PRINCIPLES OF PRESS SELECTION
    LABEDZKI, W
    MECHANIK MIESIECZNIK NAUKOWO-TECHNICZNY, 1981, 54 (07): : 326 - 327
  • [28] Refractory selection principles
    Hodgson, Geoff
    Glass international, 1989, : 25 - 26
  • [29] Selection principles for Gaia
    Arthur, Rudy
    Nicholson, Arwen
    JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 2022, 533
  • [30] Discussion of "Data-driven confounder selection via Markov and Bayesian networks" by Haggstrom
    Richardson, Thomas S.
    Robins, James M.
    Wang, Linbo
    BIOMETRICS, 2018, 74 (02) : 403 - 406