Principles of confounder selection

被引:0
|
作者
Tyler J. VanderWeele
机构
[1] Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health,Department of Epidemiology
来源
关键词
Confounder; Causal inference; Collider; Covariate adjustment; Selection;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Selecting an appropriate set of confounders for which to control is critical for reliable causal inference. Recent theoretical and methodological developments have helped clarify a number of principles of confounder selection. When complete knowledge of a causal diagram relating all covariates to each other is available, graphical rules can be used to make decisions about covariate control. Unfortunately, such complete knowledge is often unavailable. This paper puts forward a practical approach to confounder selection decisions when the somewhat less stringent assumption is made that knowledge is available for each covariate whether it is a cause of the exposure, and whether it is a cause of the outcome. Based on recent theoretically justified developments in the causal inference literature, the following proposal is made for covariate control decisions: control for each covariate that is a cause of the exposure, or of the outcome, or of both; exclude from this set any variable known to be an instrumental variable; and include as a covariate any proxy for an unmeasured variable that is a common cause of both the exposure and the outcome. Various principles of confounder selection are then further related to statistical covariate selection methods.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 219
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Principles of confounder selection
    VanderWeele, Tyler J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 34 (03) : CP3 - 219
  • [2] Theory meets practice: a commentary on VanderWeele's "principles of confounder selection'
    Schneeweiss, Sebastian
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 34 (03) : 221 - 222
  • [3] Theory meets practice: a commentary on VanderWeele’s ‘principles of confounder selection’
    Sebastian Schneeweiss
    European Journal of Epidemiology, 2019, 34 : 221 - 222
  • [4] A new criterion for confounder selection? Neither a confounder nor science
    Shahar, Eyal
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2013, 19 (05) : 984 - 986
  • [5] A New Criterion for Confounder Selection
    VanderWeele, Tyler J.
    Shpitser, Ilya
    BIOMETRICS, 2011, 67 (04) : 1406 - 1413
  • [6] Introduction to causal diagrams for confounder selection
    Williamson, Elizabeth J.
    Aitken, Zoe
    Lawrie, Jock
    Dharmage, Shyamali C.
    Burgess, John A.
    Forbes, Andrew B.
    RESPIROLOGY, 2014, 19 (03) : 303 - 311
  • [7] SIMULATION STUDY OF CONFOUNDER-SELECTION STRATEGIES
    MALDONADO, G
    GREENLAND, S
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1993, 138 (11) : 923 - 936
  • [8] THE IMPACT OF CONFOUNDER SELECTION CRITERIA ON EFFECT ESTIMATION
    GREENLAND, S
    MICKEY, RM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1989, 130 (05) : 1066 - 1066
  • [9] Confounder Selection via Penalized Credible Regions
    Wilson, Ander
    Reich, Brian J.
    BIOMETRICS, 2014, 70 (04) : 852 - 861
  • [10] THE IMPACT OF CONFOUNDER SELECTION CRITERIA ON EFFECT ESTIMATION
    MICKEY, RM
    GREENLAND, S
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1989, 129 (01) : 125 - 137