Does robot-assisted gait training improve mobility, activities of daily living and quality of life in stroke? A single-blinded, randomized controlled trial

被引:0
|
作者
Rustem Mustafaoglu
Belgin Erhan
Ipek Yeldan
Berrin Gunduz
Ela Tarakci
机构
[1] Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa,Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Division of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences
[2] Istanbul Medeniyet University,Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine
[3] Istanbul Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Training Hospital,undefined
来源
Acta Neurologica Belgica | 2020年 / 120卷
关键词
Stroke; Activities of daily living; Quality of life; Robotics; Rehabilitation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) on mobility, activities of daily living (ADLs), and quality of life (QoL) in stroke rehabilitation. Fifty-one stroke patients randomly assigned to Group 1, Group 2, and Group 3 received conventional training (CT) plus RAGT, CT, and RAGT, respectively. The training duration was for 6 weeks. The primary outcome measures were the Barthel Index (BI), Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL), 6-Minute Walk Test (6-MWT), and Stair Climbing Test (SCT). The secondary outcomes were Fugl Meyer Assessment-Lower Extremity (FMA-LE), Comfortable 10-m Walk Test (CWT), Fast 10-m Walk Test (FWT), and Rate of Perceived Exertion (RPE). The mean change in all the primary [BI (p = 0.001), 6-MWT (p = 0.001), SS-QOL (p < 0.0001), and SCT (p = 0.004)] and except the FWT (p = 0.354) all the other secondary outcomes [FMA-LE (p = 0.049), CWT (p = 0.025) and RPE (p = 0.023)] improved significantly between the three groups. In the subgroup analysis, BI, 6-MWT, SS-QOL, and SCT improved significantly in Group 1 compared to Group 2 and Group 3 (p < 0.016). However, FMA-LE, CWT, and the RPE significantly improved in Group 1 compared to Group 2 and, also, only CWT improved significantly in Group 1 compared to Group 3 (p = 0.011). In a subgroup analysis of the primary and secondary outcome measures, there were no significant differences in Group 2 compared to Group 3 (p > 0.05). While combined training leads to more improvement in mobility, ADLs, and QoL, CT showed a similar improvement compared to the RAGT in stroke patients.
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 344
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Efficacy of interactive manual dexterity training after stroke: a pilot single-blinded randomized controlled trial
    Teremetz, Maxime
    Hamdoun, Sonia
    Colle, Florence
    Gerardin, Eloise
    Desvilles, Claire
    Carment, Loic
    Charron, Sylvain
    Cuenca, Macarena
    Calvet, David
    Baron, Jean-Claude
    Turc, Guillaume
    Maier, Marc A.
    Rosso, Charlotte
    Mas, Jean-Louis
    Lindberg, Pavel G.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROENGINEERING AND REHABILITATION, 2023, 20 (01)
  • [32] Efficacy of interactive manual dexterity training after stroke: a pilot single-blinded randomized controlled trial
    Maxime Térémetz
    Sonia Hamdoun
    Florence Colle
    Eloïse Gerardin
    Claire Desvilles
    Loïc Carment
    Sylvain Charron
    Macarena Cuenca
    David Calvet
    Jean-Claude Baron
    Guillaume Turc
    Marc A. Maier
    Charlotte Rosso
    Jean-Louis Mas
    Påvel G. Lindberg
    Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 20
  • [33] Electromechanical and Robot-Assisted Arm Training for Improving Arm Function and Activities of Daily Living After Stroke
    Mehrholz, Jan
    Platz, Thomas
    Kugler, Joachim
    Pohl, Marcus
    STROKE, 2009, 40 (05) : E392 - E393
  • [34] Effect of robot-assisted gait training on the biomechanical properties of burn scars: a single-blind, randomized controlled trial
    Cho, Yoon Soo
    Joo, So Young
    Seo, Cheong Hoon
    BURNS & TRAUMA, 2022, 10
  • [35] Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving arm function and activities of daily living after stroke
    Mehrholz, Jan
    Platz, Thomas
    Kugler, Joachim
    Pohl, Marcus
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2008, (04):
  • [36] Does robot-assisted gait training improve ambulation in highly disabled multiple sclerosis people? A pilot randomized control trial
    Pompa, Alessandra
    Morone, Giovanni
    Iosa, Marco
    Pace, Luca
    Catani, Sheila
    Casillo, Paolo
    Clemenzi, Alessandro
    Troisi, Elio
    Tonini, Angelo
    Paolucci, Stefano
    Grasso, Maria Grazia
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2017, 23 (05) : 696 - 703
  • [37] Virtual reality combined with robot-assisted gait training to improve walking ability of children with cerebral palsy: A randomized controlled trial
    Fu, Wen-Sheng
    Song, Yi-Cun
    Wu, Bao-Ai
    Qu, Chen-Huan
    Zhao, Jin-Feng
    TECHNOLOGY AND HEALTH CARE, 2022, 30 (06) : 1525 - 1533
  • [38] Effects of robot (SUBAR)-assisted gait training in patients with chronic stroke Randomized controlled trial
    Kang, Cheon Ji
    Chun, Min Ho
    Lee, Junekyung
    Lee, Ji Yeon
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (48)
  • [39] Effects of High-intensity Robot-assisted Hand Training on Upper Limb Recovery and Muscle Activity in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized, Controlled, Single-Blinded Trial
    Gandolfi, Marialuisa
    Vale, Nicola
    Dimitrova, Eleonora Kirilova
    Mazzoleni, Stefano
    Battini, Elena
    Benedetti, Maria Donata
    Gajofatto, Alberto
    Ferraro, Francesco
    Castelli, Matteo
    Camin, Maruo
    Filippetti, Mirko
    De Paoli, Carola
    Chemello, Elena
    Picelli, Alessandro
    Corradi, Jessica
    Waldner, Andreas
    Saltuari, Leopold
    Smania, Nicola
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2018, 9
  • [40] Effects of Robot-Assisted Gait Training on Cardiopulmonary Fitness in Subacute Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Study
    Chang, Won Hyuk
    Kim, Min Su
    Huh, Jung Phil
    Lee, Peter K. W.
    Kim, Yun-Hee
    NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2012, 26 (04) : 318 - 324