Does robot-assisted gait training improve mobility, activities of daily living and quality of life in stroke? A single-blinded, randomized controlled trial

被引:0
|
作者
Rustem Mustafaoglu
Belgin Erhan
Ipek Yeldan
Berrin Gunduz
Ela Tarakci
机构
[1] Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa,Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Division of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences
[2] Istanbul Medeniyet University,Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine
[3] Istanbul Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Training Hospital,undefined
来源
Acta Neurologica Belgica | 2020年 / 120卷
关键词
Stroke; Activities of daily living; Quality of life; Robotics; Rehabilitation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) on mobility, activities of daily living (ADLs), and quality of life (QoL) in stroke rehabilitation. Fifty-one stroke patients randomly assigned to Group 1, Group 2, and Group 3 received conventional training (CT) plus RAGT, CT, and RAGT, respectively. The training duration was for 6 weeks. The primary outcome measures were the Barthel Index (BI), Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL), 6-Minute Walk Test (6-MWT), and Stair Climbing Test (SCT). The secondary outcomes were Fugl Meyer Assessment-Lower Extremity (FMA-LE), Comfortable 10-m Walk Test (CWT), Fast 10-m Walk Test (FWT), and Rate of Perceived Exertion (RPE). The mean change in all the primary [BI (p = 0.001), 6-MWT (p = 0.001), SS-QOL (p < 0.0001), and SCT (p = 0.004)] and except the FWT (p = 0.354) all the other secondary outcomes [FMA-LE (p = 0.049), CWT (p = 0.025) and RPE (p = 0.023)] improved significantly between the three groups. In the subgroup analysis, BI, 6-MWT, SS-QOL, and SCT improved significantly in Group 1 compared to Group 2 and Group 3 (p < 0.016). However, FMA-LE, CWT, and the RPE significantly improved in Group 1 compared to Group 2 and, also, only CWT improved significantly in Group 1 compared to Group 3 (p = 0.011). In a subgroup analysis of the primary and secondary outcome measures, there were no significant differences in Group 2 compared to Group 3 (p > 0.05). While combined training leads to more improvement in mobility, ADLs, and QoL, CT showed a similar improvement compared to the RAGT in stroke patients.
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 344
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Letter to the Editor: "The Combined Effect of Robot-assisted Therapy and Activities of Daily Living Training on Upper Limb Recovery in Persons With Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial"
    Asirvatham, Thajus
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2024, 105 (10):
  • [22] Effects of robot-assisted gait training on spatiotemporal gait parameters and balance in patients with chronic stroke: A randomized controlled pilot trial
    Bang, Dae-Hyouk
    Shin, Won-Seob
    NEUROREHABILITATION, 2016, 38 (04) : 343 - 349
  • [23] Sensorimotor Training Improves Gait, Ankle Joint Proprioception, and Quality of Life in Patients With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Single-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
    Saleh, Marwa Shafiek Mustafa
    Elbanna, Rana Hesham Mohamed
    Abdelhakiem, Nadia Mohamed
    Abdalla, Ghada Abd Elmoniem
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2024, 103 (07) : 638 - 644
  • [24] The effects of robot-assisted gait training in progressive multiple sclerosis: A randomized controlled trial
    Straudi, Sofia
    Fanciullacci, Chiara
    Martinuzzi, Carlotta
    Pavarelli, Claudia
    Rossi, Bruno
    Chisari, Carmelo
    Basaglia, Nino
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2016, 22 (03) : 373 - 384
  • [25] Robot-Assisted Gait Training in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial
    Sconza, Cristiano
    Negrini, Francesco
    Di Matteo, Berardo
    Borboni, Alberto
    Boccia, Gennaro
    Petrikonis, Ignas
    Stankevicius, Edgaras
    Casale, Roberto
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2021, 57 (07):
  • [26] Effects of Robot-assisted Gait Training Combined with Functional Electrical Stimulation on Recovery of Locomotor Mobility in Chronic Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Bae, Young-hyeon
    Ko, Young Jun
    Chang, Won Hyuk
    Lee, Ju Hyeok
    Lee, Kyeong Bong
    Park, Yoo Jung
    Ha, Hyun Geun
    Kim, Yun-Hee
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY SCIENCE, 2014, 26 (12) : 1949 - 1953
  • [27] Robot-Assisted Gait Training Plan for Patients in Poststroke Recovery Period: A Single Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
    Deng Yu
    Zhang Yang
    Liu Lei
    Ni Chaoming
    Wu Ming
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 2021
  • [28] Sensory Stimulation and Robot-Assisted Arm Training After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Egger, Marion
    Bergmann, Jeannine
    Krewer, Carmen
    Jahn, Klaus
    Mueller, Friedemann
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGIC PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2024, 48 (04): : 178 - 187
  • [29] Application of digital practice to improve head movement, visual perception and activities of daily living for subacute stroke patients with unilateral spatial neglect Preliminary results of a single-blinded, randomized controlled trial
    Choi, Ho-Suk
    Shin, Won-Seob
    Bang, Dae-Hyouk
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (06) : E24637
  • [30] Early robot-assisted gait retraining in non-ambulatory patients with stroke: a single blind randomized controlled trial
    Mayr, Andreas
    Quirbach, Ellen
    Picelli, Alessandro
    Kofler, Markus
    Smania, Nicola
    Saltuari, Leopold
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2018, 54 (06) : 819 - 826