Predicting binding poses and affinities for protein - ligand complexes in the 2015 D3R Grand Challenge using a physical model with a statistical parameter estimation

被引:0
|
作者
Sergei Grudinin
Maria Kadukova
Andreas Eisenbarth
Simon Marillet
Frédéric Cazals
机构
[1] University of Grenoble Alpes,
[2] LJK,undefined
[3] CNRS,undefined
[4] LJK,undefined
[5] Inria,undefined
[6] Université Côte d’Azur and Inria,undefined
[7] Virology and Molecular Immunology,undefined
[8] INRA,undefined
来源
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design | 2016年 / 30卷
关键词
Protein-ligand docking; Machine learning; Scoring function; Ridge regression; Parameter estimation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The 2015 D3R Grand Challenge provided an opportunity to test our new model for the binding free energy of small molecules, as well as to assess our protocol to predict binding poses for protein-ligand complexes. Our pose predictions were ranked 3–9 for the HSP90 dataset, depending on the assessment metric. For the MAP4K dataset the ranks are very dispersed and equal to 2–35, depending on the assessment metric, which does not provide any insight into the accuracy of the method. The main success of our pose prediction protocol was the re-scoring stage using the recently developed Convex-PL potential. We make a thorough analysis of our docking predictions made with AutoDock Vina and discuss the effect of the choice of rigid receptor templates, the number of flexible residues in the binding pocket, the binding pocket size, and the benefits of re-scoring. However, the main challenge was to predict experimentally determined binding affinities for two blind test sets. Our affinity prediction model consisted of two terms, a pairwise-additive enthalpy, and a non pairwise-additive entropy. We trained the free parameters of the model with a regularized regression using affinity and structural data from the PDBBind database. Our model performed very well on the training set, however, failed on the two test sets. We explain the drawback and pitfalls of our model, in particular in terms of relative coverage of the test set by the training set and missed dynamical properties from crystal structures, and discuss different routes to improve it.
引用
收藏
页码:791 / 804
页数:13
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [21] Improving binding mode and binding affinity predictions of docking by ligand-based search of protein conformations: evaluation in D3R grand challenge 2015
    Xu, Xianjin
    Yan, Chengfei
    Zou, Xiaoqin
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2017, 31 (08) : 689 - 699
  • [22] Blinded prediction of protein–ligand binding affinity using Amber thermodynamic integration for the 2018 D3R grand challenge 4
    Junjie Zou
    Chuan Tian
    Carlos Simmerling
    Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2019, 33 : 1021 - 1029
  • [23] Calculate protein-ligand binding affinities with the extended linear interaction energy method: application on the Cathepsin S set in the D3R Grand Challenge 3
    He, Xibing
    Man, Viet H.
    Ji, Beihong
    Xie, Xiang-Qun
    Wang, Junmei
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2019, 33 (01) : 105 - 117
  • [24] Protein–ligand pose and affinity prediction: Lessons from D3R Grand Challenge 3
    Panagiotis I. Koukos
    Li C. Xue
    Alexandre M. J. J. Bonvin
    Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2019, 33 : 83 - 91
  • [25] Ranking docking poses by graph matching of protein-ligand interactions: lessons learned from the D3R Grand Challenge 2
    Figueiredo Celestino Gomes, Priscila da Silva
    Da Silva, Franck
    Bret, Guillaume
    Rognan, Didier
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2018, 32 (01) : 75 - 87
  • [26] Using physics-based pose predictions and free energy perturbation calculations to predict binding poses and relative binding affinities for FXR ligands in the D3R Grand Challenge 2
    Christina Athanasiou
    Sofia Vasilakaki
    Dimitris Dellis
    Zoe Cournia
    Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2018, 32 : 21 - 44
  • [27] Using physics-based pose predictions and free energy perturbation calculations to predict binding poses and relative binding affinities for FXR ligands in the D3R Grand Challenge 2
    Athanasiou, Christina
    Vasilakaki, Sofia
    Dellis, Dimitris
    Cournia, Zoe
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2018, 32 (01) : 21 - 44
  • [28] Blinded prediction of protein-ligand binding affinity using Amber thermodynamic integration for the 2018 D3R grand challenge 4
    Zou, Junjie
    Tian, Chuan
    Simmerling, Carlos
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2019, 33 (12) : 1021 - 1029
  • [29] Protein-ligand pose and affinity prediction: Lessons from D3R Grand Challenge 3
    Koukos, Panagiotis I.
    Xue, Li C.
    Bonvin, Alexandre M. J. J.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2019, 33 (01) : 83 - 91
  • [30] Performance of HADDOCK and a simple contact-based protein–ligand binding affinity predictor in the D3R Grand Challenge 2
    Zeynep Kurkcuoglu
    Panagiotis I. Koukos
    Nevia Citro
    Mikael E. Trellet
    J. P. G. L. M. Rodrigues
    Irina S. Moreira
    Jorge Roel-Touris
    Adrien S. J. Melquiond
    Cunliang Geng
    Jörg Schaarschmidt
    Li C. Xue
    Anna Vangone
    A. M. J. J. Bonvin
    Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2018, 32 : 175 - 185