Effects of Variables in a Response Propensity Score Model for Survey Data Adjustment: A Simulation Study

被引:0
|
作者
Masafumi Fukuda
机构
[1] The Mainichi Newspapers,
关键词
post-survey adjustment; propensity score; response propensity; variable selection;
D O I
10.2333/bhmk.38.33
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
On building a model for estimating response propensity score for survey data adjustment, we carried out computer simulations to examine the effects of seven types of variables, each having differing associations with the sample inclusion probability, response probability and study variable, by comparing the respective cases in which the variables are included and excluded by the model. Then the following main results were obtained. The most important variable for the model is the one that is simultaneously associated with the study variable, the sample inclusion probability, and the response probability. The variables which have no association with the study variable should not be included in the response propensity model. These results support the conclusions of Brookhart et al. (2006), who examined propensity score models in their study on estimating treatment effects. Additionally, a small difference was found in comparing the effects of the variable associated with sample inclusion probability and the study variable to those of the variable associated with the response probability and the study vari able.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 61
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] PERFORMANCE OF PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHING IN SMALL SAMPLES - SIMULATION STUDY
    Cenzer, I
    Boscardin, W. J.
    Berger, K.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S396 - S397
  • [32] Balance on Unmeasured Socioeconomic Variables Obtained by Matching on Propensity Score in a Vaccine Study
    Amend, Kandace L.
    Turnbull, Bruce
    Zhou, Li
    Seeger, John D.
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2017, 26 : 422 - 423
  • [33] EFFECTS OF 4 INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES ON SURVEY RESPONSE
    POURJALALI, H
    KIMBRELL, J
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1994, 75 (02) : 895 - 898
  • [34] A Stata package for the estimation of the dose-response function through adjustment for the generalized propensity score
    Bia, Michela
    Mattei, Alessandra
    STATA JOURNAL, 2008, 8 (03): : 354 - 373
  • [35] Safety and efficacy of antiplatelet response assay and drug adjustment in coil embolization: a propensity score analysis
    Min Soo Kim
    Kyung Il Jo
    Je Young Yeon
    Jong Soo Kim
    Keon Ha Kim
    Pyoung Jeon
    Seung Chyul Hong
    Neuroradiology, 2016, 58 : 1125 - 1134
  • [36] Safety and efficacy of antiplatelet response assay and drug adjustment in coil embolization: a propensity score analysis
    Kim, Min Soo
    Jo, Kyung Il
    Yeon, Je Young
    Kim, Jong Soo
    Kim, Keon Ha
    Jeon, Pyoung
    Hong, Seung Chyul
    NEURORADIOLOGY, 2016, 58 (11) : 1125 - 1134
  • [37] A new weighted balance measure helped to select the variables to be included in a propensity score model
    Caruana, Emmanuel
    Chevret, Sylvie
    Resche-Rigon, Matthieu
    Pirracchio, Romain
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 68 (12) : 1415 - 1422
  • [38] Propensity score model specification for estimation of average treatment effects
    Waernbaum, Ingeborg
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2010, 140 (07) : 1948 - 1956
  • [39] A FURTHER STUDY OF PROPENSITY SCORE CALIBRATION IN MISSING DATA ANALYSIS
    Han, Peisong
    STATISTICA SINICA, 2018, 28 (03) : 1307 - 1332
  • [40] Effects of Including Variables Such as Length of Stay in a Propensity Score Analysis With Costs as Outcome Reply
    Klein, Eili Y.
    Tseng, Katie K.
    Gatalo, Oliver
    Cosgrove, Sara E.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2019, 69 (11) : 2040 - 2042