Effects of Variables in a Response Propensity Score Model for Survey Data Adjustment: A Simulation Study

被引:0
|
作者
Masafumi Fukuda
机构
[1] The Mainichi Newspapers,
关键词
post-survey adjustment; propensity score; response propensity; variable selection;
D O I
10.2333/bhmk.38.33
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
On building a model for estimating response propensity score for survey data adjustment, we carried out computer simulations to examine the effects of seven types of variables, each having differing associations with the sample inclusion probability, response probability and study variable, by comparing the respective cases in which the variables are included and excluded by the model. Then the following main results were obtained. The most important variable for the model is the one that is simultaneously associated with the study variable, the sample inclusion probability, and the response probability. The variables which have no association with the study variable should not be included in the response propensity model. These results support the conclusions of Brookhart et al. (2006), who examined propensity score models in their study on estimating treatment effects. Additionally, a small difference was found in comparing the effects of the variable associated with sample inclusion probability and the study variable to those of the variable associated with the response probability and the study vari able.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 61
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Performance of propensity score calibration- : A simulation study
    Sturmer, Til
    Schneeweiss, Sebastian
    Rothman, Kenneth J.
    Avorn, Jerry
    Glynn, Robert J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2007, 165 (10) : 1110 - 1118
  • [22] Covariate Balance Assessment, Model Selection and Bias in Propensity Score Matching: A Simulation Study
    Ali, M. Sanni
    Groenwold, Rolf H. H.
    Belitser, Svetlana V.
    Roes, Kit C. B.
    Hoes, Arno W.
    de Boer, Anthonius
    Klungel, Olaf H.
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2015, 24 : 22 - 22
  • [23] Should a propensity score model be super? The utility of ensemble procedures for causal adjustment
    Alam, Shomoita
    Moodie, Erica E. M.
    Stephens, David A.
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2019, 38 (09) : 1690 - 1702
  • [24] Using Propensity Score Analysis of Survey Data to Estimate Population Average Treatment Effects: A Case Study Comparing Different Methods
    Dong, Nianbo
    Stuart, Elizabeth A.
    Lenis, David
    Trang Quynh Nguyen
    EVALUATION REVIEW, 2020, 44 (01) : 84 - 108
  • [25] Propensity score adjustment of a treatment effect with missing data in psychiatric health services research
    Mayer, Benjamin
    Puschner, Bernd
    EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOSTATISTICS AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2015, 12 (01): : 1 - 7
  • [26] Propensity Score Adjustment With Multilevel Data: Setting Your Sites on Decreasing Selection Bias
    Griswold, Michael E.
    Localio, A. Russell
    Mulrow, Cynthia
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2010, 152 (06) : 393 - +
  • [27] Effects of Including Variables Such as Length of Stay in a Propensity Score Analysis With Costs as Outcome
    Hemmige, Vagish
    David, Michael Z.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2019, 69 (11) : 2039 - 2040
  • [28] Propensity Score Matching and Unmeasured Covariate Imbalance: A Simulation Study
    Ali, M. Sanni
    Groenwold, Rolf H. H.
    Belitser, Svetlana V.
    Hoes, Arno W.
    de Boer, A.
    Klungel, Olaf H.
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2014, 23 : 12 - 13
  • [29] Multinomial Extension of Propensity Score Trimming Methods: A Simulation Study
    Yoshida, Kazuki
    Solomon, Daniel H.
    Haneuse, Sebastien
    Kim, Seoyoung C.
    Patorno, Elisabetta
    Tedeschi, Sara K.
    Lyu, Houchen
    Franklin, Jessica M.
    Sturmer, Til
    Hernandez-Diaz, Sonia
    Glynn, Robert J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 188 (03) : 609 - 616
  • [30] The Impact of Overfitting Logistic Propensity Score Models: A Simulation Study
    Wyss, Richard
    Franklin, Jessica M.
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2017, 26 : 529 - 529