The Framing of Past Bullying Experiences: Impact on Social Decision-Making, Emotions, and Predictions of the Future

被引:0
|
作者
Stark A.M. [1 ,2 ]
Hopkins S. [1 ]
Fireman G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Psychology, Suffolk University, 73 Tremont Street, Boston, 02115, MA
[2] McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 115 Mill Street, Belmont, 02478, MA
关键词
Bullying; Frames; Gender; Social decision-making;
D O I
10.1007/s42380-021-00102-w
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Studies on framing demonstrate that the way ideas are presented influences emotions and decision-making. Many bullying interventions involve competing frames, with some discussing bullying in terms of negative effects and others in terms of resiliency. Gender is closely related to frames about bullying, as culturally communicated expectations contribute to differences in individuals’ internalized frames. The current cross-sectional study explores how resiliency and negative effects frames in the context of bullying impact emotion and social decision-making across males and females. Participants (N = 92) ages 19–30 (M = 27.97, SD = 2.17) answered questionnaires around self-construal, internalized beliefs about bullying, and current bullying experiences before being randomized to write about a time they either demonstrated resiliency to or negative effects from bullying, balanced by males and females. The participants completed questionnaires regarding predictions of future bullying, current emotions, and social decision-making. The four groups were entered in a MANOVA and compared across dependent measures to better understand how both frames and gender affected future predictions of bullying, current emotions, and social decision-making. The overall model was significant (Wilks Lamda =.51, F = 1.94, p = 0.004, ηp2 =.20). Next, a MANOVA compared males versus females on self-construal, beliefs about bullying, and current levels of bullying to better understand pre-existing gender-based differences. The overall model was significant (Wilks Lamda, F = 3.41, p = 0.00). These variables that differed across gender were entered as covariates into a MANCOVA model which compared the four groups across dependent measures, with the aim to elucidate factors influencing the gender by frame effect. The overall model was significant (Wilks Lamda = 0.57, F(30,228) = 1.81, p = 0.009, ηp2 = 0.20). The results demonstrate that frames around bullying influence emotions and social decision-making, and that this impact differs across gender. © 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
引用
收藏
页码:266 / 284
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Emotions and teacher decision-making: An analysis of social studies teachers' perspectives
    Sheppard, Maia
    Levy, Sara A.
    [J]. TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION, 2019, 77 : 193 - 203
  • [32] THE ROLE OF EMOTIONS IN MULTIORGANIZATIONAL DECISION-MAKING
    HOWARD, N
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 1993, 44 (06) : 613 - 623
  • [33] FRAMING EFFECTS IN DECISION-MAKING: ORBITOFRONTAL DAMAGE DISRUPTS THE DECISION, BUT NOT THE FRAMING EFFECT
    Garr, Anna
    Fellows, Lesley
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, : 89 - 89
  • [34] Citizen Participation in Health Decision-Making: Past Experience and Future Prospects
    John Church
    Duncan Saunders
    Margaret Wanke
    Raymond Pong
    Carol Spooner
    Marlene Dorgan
    [J]. Journal of Public Health Policy, 2002, 23 : 12 - 32
  • [35] Citizen participation in health decision-making: Past experience and future prospects
    Church, J
    Saunders, D
    Wanke, M
    Pong, R
    Spooner, C
    Dorgan, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY, 2002, 23 (01) : 12 - 32
  • [36] Framing Effects in Older Adults' Medical Decision-Making: Social Distance Matters
    Chen, Yunjiao
    Xu, Jie
    Xing, Cai
    [J]. JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES B-PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2023, 78 (01): : 82 - 86
  • [37] AN ALTERNATIVE INTERPRETATION OF FRAMING EFFECT IN DECISION-MAKING
    JOU, JW
    SHANTEAU, J
    HARRIS, RJ
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE PSYCHONOMIC SOCIETY, 1991, 29 (06) : 516 - 516
  • [38] Impact of the gut microbiome composition on social decision-making
    Falkenstein, Marie
    Simon, Marie-Christine
    Mantri, Aakash
    Weber, Bernd
    Koban, Leonie
    Plassmann, Hilke
    [J]. PNAS NEXUS, 2024, 3 (05):
  • [39] Impact of Social Media and Web 2.0 on Decision-Making
    Power, Daniel J.
    Phillips-Wren, Gloria
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DECISION SYSTEMS, 2011, 20 (03) : 249 - 261
  • [40] Ethical Champions, Emotions, Framing, and Team Ethical Decision Making
    Chen, Anjier
    Trevino, Linda Klebe
    Humphrey, Stephen E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 105 (03) : 245 - 273