Comparison of the optimal and suboptimal quantity of mitotype libraries using next-generation sequencing

被引:0
|
作者
Marcel Obal
Tomaž Zupanc
Irena Zupanič Pajnič
机构
[1] University of Ljubljana,Institute of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine
来源
关键词
Mitogenome; Second World War; Haplotype; Next-generation sequencing; Library input;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Optimizing analysis parameters and sample input is crucial in forensic genetics methods to generate reliable results, and even more so when working with muti-copy mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and low-quality samples. This study compared mitotypes based on next-generation sequencing (NGS) results derived from the same samples at two different sequencing library concentrations—30 pM and 0.3 pM. Thirty femur samples from the Second World War were used as a model for poorly preserved DNA. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) method targeting 113 bp long fragment was employed to assess the quantity of mitogenomes. HID Ion Chef™ Instrument with Precision ID mtDNA Control Region Panel was used for library preparation and templating. Sequencing was performed with Ion GeneStudio™ S5 System. Reference haplotypes were determined from sequencing samples at 30 pM library input. Haplotypes were compared between optimal (30 pM) and suboptimal (0.3 pM) library inputs. Often the difference in haplotypes was length heteroplasmy, which in line with other studies shows that this type of variant is not reliable for interpretation in forensics. Excluding length variants at positions 573, 309, and 16,193, 56.7% of the samples matched, and in two samples, no sequence was obtained at suboptimal library input. The rest of the samples differed between optimal and suboptimal library input. To conclude, genotyping and analyzing low-quantity libraries derived from low-quality aged skeletonized human remains therefore must be done with caution in forensic genetics casework.
引用
收藏
页码:395 / 400
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of the oral microbiome of siblings using next-generation sequencing: a pilot study
    Lee, H-S
    Lee, J. H.
    Kim, S-O
    Song, J. S.
    Kim, B. I.
    Kim, Y. J.
    Lee, J-H
    ORAL DISEASES, 2016, 22 (06) : 549 - 556
  • [32] A practical comparison of the next-generation sequencing platform and assemblers using yeast genome
    Jeon, Min-Seung
    Jeong, Da Min
    Doh, Huijeong
    Kang, Hyun Ah
    Jung, Hyungtaek
    Eyun, Seong-il
    LIFE SCIENCE ALLIANCE, 2023, 6 (04)
  • [34] HUMAN DISEASE Next-generation sequencing of the next generation
    Burgess, Darren J.
    NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2011, 12 (02) : 78 - 79
  • [35] Comparison of Next-Generation Sequencing Versus Biological Indexing for the Optimal Detection of Viral Pathogens in Grapevine
    Al Rwahnih, Maher
    Daubert, Steve
    Golino, Deborah
    Islas, Christina
    Rowhani, Adib
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2015, 105 (06) : 758 - 763
  • [36] Next-generation sequencing in epigenetics
    Zeschnigk, Michael
    Horsthemke, Bernhard
    MEDIZINISCHE GENETIK, 2019, 31 (02) : 205 - 211
  • [37] Next-generation sequencing in the clinic
    Jason Y Park
    Larry J Kricka
    Paolo Fortina
    Nature Biotechnology, 2013, 31 : 990 - 992
  • [38] The chemistry of next-generation sequencing
    Raphaël Rodriguez
    Yamuna Krishnan
    Nature Biotechnology, 2023, 41 : 1709 - 1715
  • [39] Next-generation sequencing in ophthalmology
    Wolf, Julian
    Lange, Clemens
    Reinhard, Thomas
    Schlunck, Guenther
    SPEKTRUM DER AUGENHEILKUNDE, 2024,
  • [40] Next-generation sequencing: The race is on
    von Bubnoff, Andreas
    CELL, 2008, 132 (05) : 721 - 723