Comparison of the optimal and suboptimal quantity of mitotype libraries using next-generation sequencing

被引:0
|
作者
Marcel Obal
Tomaž Zupanc
Irena Zupanič Pajnič
机构
[1] University of Ljubljana,Institute of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine
来源
关键词
Mitogenome; Second World War; Haplotype; Next-generation sequencing; Library input;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Optimizing analysis parameters and sample input is crucial in forensic genetics methods to generate reliable results, and even more so when working with muti-copy mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and low-quality samples. This study compared mitotypes based on next-generation sequencing (NGS) results derived from the same samples at two different sequencing library concentrations—30 pM and 0.3 pM. Thirty femur samples from the Second World War were used as a model for poorly preserved DNA. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) method targeting 113 bp long fragment was employed to assess the quantity of mitogenomes. HID Ion Chef™ Instrument with Precision ID mtDNA Control Region Panel was used for library preparation and templating. Sequencing was performed with Ion GeneStudio™ S5 System. Reference haplotypes were determined from sequencing samples at 30 pM library input. Haplotypes were compared between optimal (30 pM) and suboptimal (0.3 pM) library inputs. Often the difference in haplotypes was length heteroplasmy, which in line with other studies shows that this type of variant is not reliable for interpretation in forensics. Excluding length variants at positions 573, 309, and 16,193, 56.7% of the samples matched, and in two samples, no sequence was obtained at suboptimal library input. The rest of the samples differed between optimal and suboptimal library input. To conclude, genotyping and analyzing low-quantity libraries derived from low-quality aged skeletonized human remains therefore must be done with caution in forensic genetics casework.
引用
收藏
页码:395 / 400
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] APPLICATIONS OF NEXT-GENERATION SEQUENCING Sequencing technologies - the next generation
    Metzker, Michael L.
    NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2010, 11 (01) : 31 - 46
  • [22] Chimerism analysis using next-generation sequencing
    Iozzi, Sara
    Ciappi, Dario
    Palchetti, Simona
    Ricci, Ugo
    Rombola, Giovanni
    Pelo, Elisabetta
    HLA, 2023, 101 (04) : 391 - 391
  • [23] Interrogating Pharmacogenetics Using Next-Generation Sequencing
    Ji, Yuan
    Shaaban, Sherin
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2024, 9 (01): : 50 - 60
  • [24] Screening for oncoviruses using next-generation sequencing
    El-Dinali, Mohamed
    Braegelmann, Johannes
    Salgia, Ravi
    Seiwert, Tanguy
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2010, 70
  • [25] Transcriptome Profiling Using Next-Generation Sequencing
    Asmann, Yan W.
    Wallace, Michael B.
    Thompson, E. Aubrey
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 135 (05) : 1466 - 1468
  • [26] Transcriptome analysis using next-generation sequencing
    Mutz, Kai-Oliver
    Heilkenbrinker, Alexandra
    Loenne, Maren
    Walter, Johanna-Gabriela
    Stahl, Frank
    CURRENT OPINION IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2013, 24 (01) : 22 - 30
  • [27] CHIMERISM MONITORING BY NEXT-GENERATION SEQUENCING: A MULTIPLATFORM COMPARISON
    Bouwmans, Evelien E.
    van de Pasch, Loes A.
    Penning, Maarten T.
    Rozemuller, Erik
    HUMAN IMMUNOLOGY, 2018, 79 : 138 - 138
  • [28] NGSNGS: next-generation simulator for next-generation sequencing data
    Henriksen, Rasmus Amund
    Zhao, Lei
    Korneliussen, Thorfinn Sand
    BIOINFORMATICS, 2023, 39 (01)
  • [29] Confirmation of Novel Gene Fusions Detected by Next-Generation Sequencing using Enriched RNA Libraries
    Ngo, N. T.
    Nguyen, H.
    Almradi, A.
    Hill, C. E.
    Zhang, L.
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2018, 20 (06): : 976 - 976
  • [30] Genomic analysis and comparison of the extremely halophilic archaea using next-generation sequencing
    Rhee, Jin-Kyu
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2016, 30