Response Strategies and Learning in Discrete Choice Experiments

被引:0
|
作者
Gabriela Scheufele
Jeff Bennett
机构
[1] The Australian National University,Crawford School of Economics and Government
来源
关键词
Incentive compatibility; Discrete choice experiments; Random parameter multinominal logit models; Ordering effects; Repeated binary choice task; Response strategies;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study explores ordering effects and response strategies in repeated binary discrete choice experiments. Mechanism design theory and empirical evidence suggest that repeated choice tasks per respondent induce strategic behaviour. We find evidence that strategic opportunities provided by the order in which choice sets are presented to respondents affect choice decisions (strategic response). The results suggest, however, that respondents may solely respond to high cost rather than low cost inconsistencies. That is, respondents are more cost sensitive, and thus have a lower willingness to pay (WTP), if the same or a similar level of provision was offered in a previous choice set at a lower cost than if it was not. Yet, the cost sensitivity, and thus WTP, remains unaffected if the same or a similar level of provision was offered in a previous choice set at a higher cost. Our findings further indicate that cost sensitivity increases (and thus WTP decreases), when respondents progress through the choice task, with this increase (decrease) lessening as more choice questions are answered. Possible explanations are value learning and strategic learning.
引用
收藏
页码:435 / 453
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] To choose or not? The value of discrete-choice experiments in rheumatology
    Janet E. Pope
    Nature Reviews Rheumatology, 2022, 18 : 433 - 434
  • [42] Discrete choice experiments of pharmacy services: a systematic review
    Caroline Vass
    Ewan Gray
    Katherine Payne
    International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 2016, 38 : 620 - 630
  • [43] Scale Heterogeneity in Healthcare Discrete Choice Experiments: A Primer
    Vass, Caroline M.
    Wright, Stuart
    Burton, Michael
    Payne, Katherine
    PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2018, 11 (02): : 167 - 173
  • [44] Simple models of discrete choice and their performance in bandit experiments
    Gans, Noah
    Knox, George
    Croson, Rachel
    M&SOM-MANUFACTURING & SERVICE OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2007, 9 (04) : 383 - 408
  • [45] What can discrete choice experiments do for you?
    Cleland, Jennifer
    Porteous, Terry
    Skatun, Diane
    MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2018, 52 (11) : 1113 - 1124
  • [46] To choose or not? The value of discrete-choice experiments in rheumatology
    Pope, Janet E.
    NATURE REVIEWS RHEUMATOLOGY, 2022, 18 (08) : 433 - 434
  • [47] Taking the Shortcut: Simplifying Heuristics in Discrete Choice Experiments
    Veldwijk, Jorien
    Marceta, Stella Maria
    Swait, Joffre Dan
    Lipman, Stefan Adriaan
    de Bekker-Grob, Esther Wilhelmina
    PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2023, 16 (04): : 301 - 315
  • [48] Effects of alternative elicitation formats in discrete choice experiments
    Scheufele, Gabriela
    Bennett, Jeff
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2013, 57 (02) : 214 - 233
  • [49] Discrete choice experiments: an insight into what patients prefer
    Fedson, Savitri
    HEART, 2019, 105 (10) : 738 - 739
  • [50] Taking the Shortcut: Simplifying Heuristics in Discrete Choice Experiments
    Jorien Veldwijk
    Stella Maria Marceta
    Joffre Dan Swait
    Stefan Adriaan Lipman
    Esther Wilhelmina de Bekker-Grob
    The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2023, 16 : 301 - 315