Taking the Shortcut: Simplifying Heuristics in Discrete Choice Experiments

被引:0
|
作者
Jorien Veldwijk
Stella Maria Marceta
Joffre Dan Swait
Stefan Adriaan Lipman
Esther Wilhelmina de Bekker-Grob
机构
[1] Erasmus University Rotterdam,Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management
[2] Erasmus University Rotterdam,Erasmus Choice Modelling Centre
[3] Erasmus University Rotterdam,Erasmus Centre for Health Economics Rotterdam
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Health-related discrete choice experiments (DCEs) information can be used to inform decision-making on the development, authorisation, reimbursement and marketing of drugs and devices as well as treatments in clinical practice. Discrete choice experiment is a stated preference method based on random utility theory (RUT), which imposes strong assumptions on respondent choice behaviour. However, respondents may use choice processes that do not adhere to the normative rationality assumptions implied by RUT, applying simplifying decision rules that are more selective in the amount and type of processed information (i.e., simplifying heuristics). An overview of commonly detected simplifying heuristics in health-related DCEs is lacking, making it unclear how to identify and deal with these heuristics; more specifically, how researchers might alter DCE design and modelling strategies to accommodate for the effects of heuristics. Therefore, the aim of this paper is three-fold: (1) provide an overview of common simplifying heuristics in health-related DCEs, (2) describe how choice task design and context as well as target population selection might impact the use of heuristics, (3) outline DCE design strategies that recognise the use of simplifying heuristics and develop modelling strategies to demonstrate the detection and impact of simplifying heuristics in DCE study outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 315
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Taking the shortcut: simplifying heuristics in Discrete Choice Experiments
    Veldwijk, Jorien
    Marceta, Stella M.
    Swait, Joffre D.
    Lipman, Stefan A.
    Grob, Esther W. De Bekker
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2024, 44 (02) : NP152 - NP152
  • [2] Taking the Shortcut: Simplifying Heuristics in Discrete Choice Experiments
    Veldwijk, Jorien
    Marceta, Stella Maria
    Swait, Joffre Dan
    Lipman, Stefan Adriaan
    de Bekker-Grob, Esther Wilhelmina
    PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2023, 16 (04): : 301 - 315
  • [3] Comment on: Taking the Shortcut: Simplifying Heuristics in Discrete Choice Experiments
    F. Reed Johnson
    The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2023, 16 : 289 - 292
  • [4] Comment on: Taking the Shortcut: Simplifying Heuristics in Discrete Choice Experiments
    Johnson, F. Reed
    PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2023, 16 (04): : 289 - 292
  • [5] Embedding Decision Heuristics in Discrete Choice Models: A Review
    Leong, Waiyan
    Hensher, David Alan
    TRANSPORT REVIEWS, 2012, 32 (03) : 313 - 331
  • [6] Choice certainty, consistency, and monotonicity in discrete choice experiments
    Mattmann, Matteo
    Logar, Ivana
    Brouwer, Roy
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2019, 8 (02) : 109 - 127
  • [7] Preference Stability and Choice Consistency in Discrete Choice Experiments
    Dan Rigby
    Michael Burton
    Jo Pluske
    Environmental and Resource Economics, 2016, 65 : 441 - 461
  • [8] Varying choice set sizes in discrete choice experiments
    Akinc, Deniz
    Street, Deborah J.
    Vandebroek, Martina
    JOURNAL OF CHOICE MODELLING, 2024, 52
  • [9] Preference Stability and Choice Consistency in Discrete Choice Experiments
    Rigby, Dan
    Burton, Michael
    Pluske, Jo
    ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2016, 65 (02): : 441 - 461
  • [10] Issues in the Design of Discrete Choice Experiments
    Richard Norman
    Benjamin M. Craig
    Paul Hansen
    Marcel F. Jonker
    John Rose
    Deborah J. Street
    Brendan Mulhern
    The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2019, 12 : 281 - 285