Utility of Percutaneous Intervention in the Management of Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheters

被引:0
|
作者
John F. Angle
Alfred T. Shilling
Worthington G. Schenk
Eric A. Bissonette
Kevin S. Stadtlander
Klaus D. Hagspiel
David J. Spinosa
Daniel A. Leung
Alan H. Matsumoto
机构
[1] Division of Angiography and Interventional Radiology,
[2] University of Virginia Health System,undefined
[3] Charlottesville,undefined
[4] VA USA,undefined
[5] The Medical College of Virginia,undefined
[6] Richmond,undefined
[7] VA,undefined
[8] USA,undefined
[9] Department of Surgery,undefined
[10] University of Virginia Health System,undefined
[11] Charlottesville,undefined
[12] VA,undefined
[13] USA,undefined
[14] Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology,undefined
[15] University of Virginia Health System,undefined
[16] Charlottesville,undefined
[17] VA,undefined
[18] USA,undefined
关键词
Catheter; Conservative Management; Patency Rate; Percutaneous Intervention; Catheter Exchange;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A variety of interventional techniques have been developed to restore function to dysfunctional tunneled hemodialysis catheters (THC). The relative efficacies of these techniques were evaluated retrospectively to determine which therapy might be most beneficial. The records of malfunctioning THCs referred to interventional radiology between November 1995 and December 1999 were retrospectively reviewed. Dysfunctional THCs were studied using DSA images obtained while injecting contrast through the lumens of the THCs. The interventions performed were categorized into 1 of 5 groups: no treatment or conservative measures such as vigorous flushing; advancing a guidewire through the THC to reposition the catheter tip or to dislodge a small thrombus; catheter exchange over a guidewire; fibrin stripping of the THC using a loop snare; or prolonged (4 or more hr) direct thrombolytic infusion. A Cox Proportional Hazards model was developed to compare the rate of failure among the procedures. There were 340 THC studies. The catheters were managed as follows: 93 patients received conservative management only, 15 had a guidewire advanced through the catheter, 147 underwent catheter exchange, 62 were treated with a fibrin stripping procedure, and 23 received a thrombolytic infusion. Estimated 30-day patency rates for THCs were 38.2% for conservative management, 30.9% for guidewire manipulation of catheter tip, 53.6% for catheter exchange, 76.1% for fibrin stripping, and 69.8% for thrombolytic infusion. Differences among the treatments were observed (p < 0.01) and pairwise comparisons were made among the treatment groups. Failure rates were significantly higher in the catheter exchange (p <0.01) and guidewire manipulation at catheter tip (p <0.01) groups when compared with the fibrin stripping group. The catheter exchange and guidewire manipulation groups also experienced higher rates of failure when compared with the thrombolytic infusion group, although the differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.08, p = 0.17, respectively). Four procedure-related complications requiring hospitalization or other intervention occurred. Three of these were in the catheter exchange group with one incidence of sepsis, one drug reaction, and one hematoma. Fibrin stripping and thrombolytic infusion provided the greatest efficacy in the treatment of poorly functioning THCs, but all therapies demonstrated wide-ranging results. Central line exchanges did not provide a superior secondary patency and experienced more complications.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 18
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Efficacy of percutaneous fibrin sheath stripping in restoring patency of tunneled hemodialysis catheters
    Brady, PS
    Spence, LD
    Levitin, A
    Mickolich, CT
    Dolmatch, BL
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 173 (04) : 1023 - 1027
  • [12] Experience with tunneled femoral hemodialysis catheters
    Zaleski, GX
    Funaki, B
    Lorenz, JM
    Garofalo, RS
    Moscatel, MA
    Rosenblum, JD
    Leef, JA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 172 (02) : 493 - 496
  • [13] Conversion of temporary hemodialysis catheters to tunneled catheters.
    Falk, A
    Uribarri, J
    Teodorescu, V
    Vassalotti, J
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2002, 13 : 711A - 711A
  • [15] Infection Associated with Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheters
    Beathard, Gerald A.
    Urbanes, Aris
    SEMINARS IN DIALYSIS, 2008, 21 (06) : 528 - 538
  • [16] The Utility of Extension Catheters in Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Kwan, Tak W.
    Diwan, Ravi
    Ratcliffe, Justin A.
    James, David
    Patri, Rahul
    Huang, Yili
    Liou, Michael
    Nanjundappa, Aravinda
    Daggubati, Ramesh
    Pancholy, Samir
    Patel, Tejas
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 27 (01): : 28 - 32
  • [17] Bacteremia associated with tunneled, cuffed hemodialysis catheters
    Saad, TF
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 1999, 34 (06) : 1114 - 1124
  • [18] Outcome of tunneled hemodialysis catheters placed by radiologists
    Lund, GB
    Trerotola, SO
    Scheel, PF
    Savader, SJ
    Mitchell, SE
    Venbrux, AC
    Osterman, FA
    RADIOLOGY, 1996, 198 (02) : 467 - 472
  • [19] HEMODIALYSIS TUNNELED CATHETERS: FIVE YEARS ANALYSIS
    Ancarani, Paolo
    Parodi, Denise
    Valsuani, Guido
    Lorusso, Carolina
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 30
  • [20] Insertion of tunneled hemodialysis catheters without fluoroscopy
    Elias, Rosilene Motta
    da Silva Makida, Sonia Cristina
    Abensur, Hugo
    Martins Castro, Manuel Carlos
    Affonso Moyses, Rosa Maria
    Pereira, Benedito Jorge
    de Oliveira, Rodrigo Bueno
    Luders, Claudio
    Romao, Joao Egidio, Jr.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR ACCESS, 2010, 11 (02): : 138 - 142