Optimal management of adults with pharyngitis - A multi-criteria decision analysis

被引:30
|
作者
Singh S. [1 ]
Dolan J.G. [2 ]
Centor R.M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Department of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston Salem, NC
[2] Department of Medicine, Unity Health System, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY
[3] Department of Medicine, University of Alabama-Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
关键词
Analytic Hierarchy Process; Sore Throat; Empiric Treatment; Streptococcal Infection; Centor Score;
D O I
10.1186/1472-6947-6-14
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Current practice guidelines offer different management recommendations for adults presenting with a sore throat. The key issue is the extent to which the clinical likelihood of a Group A streptococcal infection should affect patient management decisions. To help resolve this issue, we conducted a multi-criteria decision analysis using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Methods: We defined optimal patient management using four criteria: 1) reduce symptom duration; 2) prevent infectious complications, local and systemic; 3) minimize antibiotic side effects, minor and anaphylaxis; and 4) achieve prudent use of antibiotics, avoiding both over-use and underuse. In our baseline analysis we assumed that all criteria and sub-criteria were equally important except minimizing anaphylactic side effects, which was judged very strongly more important than minimizing minor side effects. Management strategies included: a) No test, No treatment; b) Perform a rapid strep test and treat if positive; c) Perform a throat culture and treat if positive; d) Perform a rapid strep test and treat if positive; if negative obtain a throat culture and treat if positive; and e) treat without further tests. We defined four scenarios based on the likelihood of group A streptococcal infection using the Centor score, a well-validated clinical index. Published data were used to estimate the likelihoods of clinical outcomes and the test operating characteristics of the rapid strep test and throat culture for identifying group A streptococcal infections. Results: Using the baseline assumptions, no testing and no treatment is preferred for patients with Centor scores of 1; two strategies - culture and treat if positive and rapid strep with culture of negative results - are equally preferable for patients with Centor scores of 2; and rapid strep with culture of negative results is the best management strategy for patients with Centor scores 3 or 4. These results are sensitive to the priorities assigned to the decision criteria, especially avoiding over-use versus under-use of antibiotics, and the population prevalence of Group A streptococcal pharyngitis. Conclusion: The optimal clinical management of adults with sore throat depends on both the clinical probability of a group A streptococcal infection and clinical judgments that incorporate individual patient and practice circumstances. © 2006Singh et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multi-criteria decision analysis for the optimal management of nitrate contamination of aquifers
    Almasri, MN
    Kaluarachchi, JJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2005, 74 (04) : 365 - 381
  • [2] Prioritizing Invasive Plant Management with Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Hohmann, Matthew G.
    Just, Michael G.
    Frank, Peter J.
    Wall, Wade A.
    Gray, Janet B.
    [J]. INVASIVE PLANT SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 6 (03) : 339 - 351
  • [3] Multi-criteria performance analysis for decision making in project management
    Marques, Guillaume
    Gourc, Didier
    Lauras, Matthieu
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2011, 29 (08) : 1057 - 1069
  • [4] Multi-criteria Decision Analysis in the Railway Risk Management Process
    Baginski, Jacek
    Flisiuk, Barbara
    Gorka, Wojciech
    Rogowski, Dariusz
    Steclik, Tomasz
    [J]. BEYOND DATABASES, ARCHITECTURES AND STRUCTURES (BDAS): PAVING THE ROAD TO SMART DATA PROCESSING AND ANALYSIS, 2019, 1018 : 126 - 138
  • [5] Multi-criteria decision analysis in urban water asset management
    Carrico, Nelson
    Covas, Didia
    Almeida, Maria do Ceu
    [J]. URBAN WATER JOURNAL, 2021, 18 (07) : 558 - 569
  • [6] Appendix A: Multi-criteria decision analysis
    Linkov, I
    Steevens, J.
    [J]. CYANOBACTERIAL HARMFUL ALGAL BLOOMS: STATE OF THE SCIENCE AND RESEARCH NEEDS, 2008, 619 : 815 - 829
  • [7] Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Waste Management in City of Karaj, Iran
    Amiri, Leila
    Ramezanianpour, Mohammad
    Farahani, Mohammadreza
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2010 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (ICEST 2010), 2010, : 471 - 477
  • [8] Multi-criteria decision analysis for waste management in Saharawi refugee camps
    Garfi, M.
    Tondelli, S.
    Bonoli, A.
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2009, 29 (10) : 2729 - 2739
  • [9] Use of Multi-criteria decision analysis to make collection management decisions
    Hemili, Mohamed
    Laouar, Mohamed Ridda
    [J]. 2018 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS (PAIS), 2018, : 88 - 92
  • [10] A multi-criteria decision analysis assessment of waste paper management options
    Hanan, Deirdre
    Burnley, Stephen
    Cooke, David
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2013, 33 (03) : 566 - 573