Prioritizing Invasive Plant Management with Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis

被引:9
|
作者
Hohmann, Matthew G. [1 ]
Just, Michael G. [2 ]
Frank, Peter J. [3 ]
Wall, Wade A. [1 ]
Gray, Janet B. [4 ]
机构
[1] US Army Engineer Res & Dev Ctr, Construct Engn Res Lab, Champaign, IL 61826 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Nat Resources & Environm Sci, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[3] Invas Species Management Inc, Vass, NC 28394 USA
[4] Endangered Species Branch, Ft Bragg, NC 28310 USA
关键词
Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP); management prioritization; multi-species management strategies; spatially explicit; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; VASCULAR FLORA; SPREAD; GIS; ECOSYSTEM; CRITERIA; HABITAT; SPACE; PEST;
D O I
10.1614/IPSM-D-11-00080.1
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Prioritizing management of invasive plants is important for large land management entities, such as federal and state public land stewards, because management resources are limited and multiple land uses and management objectives are differentially impacted. Management decisions also have important consequences for the likelihood of success and ultimate cost of control efforts. We applied multi-criteria decision analysis methods in a geographic information system using natural resource and land use data from Fort Bragg, North Carolina. Landscape-scale prioritization was based on a hierarchical model designed to increase invasive plant management efficiencies and reduce the risk of impacts to key installation management goals, such as training-land management and protected species conservation. We also applied spatial sensitivity analyses to evaluate the robustness of the prioritization to perturbations of the model weights, which were used to describe the relative importance of different elements of the hierarchical model. Based on stakeholders' need for confidence in making management investments, we incorporated the results of the sensitivity analysis into the decision-making process. We identified high-priority sites that were minimally affected by the weight perturbations as being suitable for up-front management and evaluated how adopting this strategy affected management area, locations, and costs. We found that incorporating the results of the sensitivity analysis led to a reduced management area, different target locations, and lower costs for an equal area managed. Finally, we confirmed the distinctiveness of the approach by comparing this same subset of prioritized sites with locations representing species-centric strategies for three invasive plants and their aggregate distribution. By supplying pragmatic information about the localized effects of weighting uncertainty, spatial sensitivity analyses enhanced the invasive plant management decision-making process and increased stakeholder confidence.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 351
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prioritizing Invasive Forest Plant Management Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in Minnesota, USA
    Reinhardt, Jason R.
    Russell, Matthew B.
    Lazarus, William F.
    [J]. FORESTS, 2020, 11 (11): : 1 - 14
  • [2] Prioritizing investments in public health: a multi-criteria decision analysis
    Marsh, K.
    Dolan, P.
    Kempster, J.
    Lugon, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 35 (03) : 460 - 466
  • [3] Prioritizing desalination strategies using multi-criteria decision analysis
    Afify, Assem
    [J]. DESALINATION, 2010, 250 (03) : 928 - 935
  • [4] Preview Multi-criteria decision approaches for prioritizing air-quality-management policies
    Harish, Santosh
    [J]. ONE EARTH, 2021, 4 (08): : 1071 - 1073
  • [5] Multi-criteria performance analysis for decision making in project management
    Marques, Guillaume
    Gourc, Didier
    Lauras, Matthieu
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2011, 29 (08) : 1057 - 1069
  • [6] Optimal management of adults with pharyngitis - A multi-criteria decision analysis
    Singh S.
    Dolan J.G.
    Centor R.M.
    [J]. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 6 (1)
  • [7] Multi-criteria Decision Analysis in the Railway Risk Management Process
    Baginski, Jacek
    Flisiuk, Barbara
    Gorka, Wojciech
    Rogowski, Dariusz
    Steclik, Tomasz
    [J]. BEYOND DATABASES, ARCHITECTURES AND STRUCTURES (BDAS): PAVING THE ROAD TO SMART DATA PROCESSING AND ANALYSIS, 2019, 1018 : 126 - 138
  • [8] Multi-criteria decision analysis in urban water asset management
    Carrico, Nelson
    Covas, Didia
    Almeida, Maria do Ceu
    [J]. URBAN WATER JOURNAL, 2021, 18 (07) : 558 - 569
  • [9] Prioritizing investments in new vaccines against epidemic infectious diseases: A multi-criteria decision analysis
    Gouglas, Dimitrios
    Marsh, Kevin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS, 2019, 26 (3-4) : 153 - 163
  • [10] Appendix A: Multi-criteria decision analysis
    Linkov, I
    Steevens, J.
    [J]. CYANOBACTERIAL HARMFUL ALGAL BLOOMS: STATE OF THE SCIENCE AND RESEARCH NEEDS, 2008, 619 : 815 - 829