Asymmetrical genetic attributions for prosocial versus antisocial behaviour

被引:0
|
作者
Matthew S. Lebowitz
Kathryn Tabb
Paul S. Appelbaum
机构
[1] Columbia University Irving Medical Center,Center for Research on Ethical, Legal and Social Implications of Psychiatric, Neurologic and Behavioral Genetics, Department of Psychiatry
[2] Bard College,Philosophy Program
来源
Nature Human Behaviour | 2019年 / 3卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Genetic explanations of human behaviour are increasingly common. While genetic attributions for behaviour are often considered relevant for assessing blameworthiness, it has not yet been established whether judgements about blameworthiness can themselves impact genetic attributions. Across six studies, participants read about individuals engaging in prosocial or antisocial behaviour, and rated the extent to which they believed that genetics played a role in causing the behaviour. Antisocial behaviour was consistently rated as less genetically influenced than prosocial behaviour. This was true regardless of whether genetic explanations were explicitly provided or refuted. Mediation analyses suggested that this asymmetry may stem from people’s motivating desire to hold wrongdoers responsible for their actions. These findings suggest that those who seek to study or make use of genetic explanations’ influence on evaluations of, for example, antisocial behaviour should consider whether such explanations are accepted in the first place, given the possibility of motivated causal reasoning.
引用
收藏
页码:940 / 949
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Exploring the genetic correlations of antisocial behaviour and life history traits
    Tielbeek, Jorim J.
    Barnes, J. C.
    Popma, Arne
    Polderman, Tinca J. C.
    Lee, James J.
    Perry, John R. B.
    Posthuma, Danielle
    Boutwell, Brian B.
    BJPSYCH OPEN, 2018, 4 (06): : 467 - 470
  • [42] Relations between youth antisocial and prosocial activities
    Duncan, SC
    Duncan, TE
    Strycker, LA
    Chaumeton, NR
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2002, 25 (05) : 425 - 438
  • [43] ANTISOCIAL AND PROSOCIAL CHILDREN AT A COMMUNITY-CENTER
    WODARSKI, JS
    PEDI, SJ
    SOCIAL WORK, 1977, 22 (04) : 290 - 296
  • [44] Using forum theatre in organised youth soccer to positively influence antisocial and prosocial behaviour: a pilot study
    Rutten, Esther A.
    Biesta, Gert J. J.
    Dekovic, Maja
    Stams, Geert Jan J. M.
    Schuengel, Carlo
    Verweel, Paul
    JOURNAL OF MORAL EDUCATION, 2010, 39 (01) : 65 - 78
  • [45] Editorial: Prosocial and Antisocial Behavior in Economic Games
    Branas-Garza, Pablo
    Espin, Antonio M.
    Herrmann, Benedikt
    Kujal, Praveen
    Nagel, Rosemarie
    FRONTIERS IN BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 10
  • [46] Heterogeneity of popular boys: Antisocial and prosocial configurations
    Rodkin, PC
    Farmer, TW
    Pearl, R
    Van Acker, R
    DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 36 (01) : 14 - 24
  • [47] Relations Between Youth Antisocial and Prosocial Activities
    Susan C. Duncan
    Terry E. Duncan
    Lisa A. Strycker
    Nigel R. Chaumeton
    Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 2002, 25 : 425 - 438
  • [48] Young infants prefer prosocial to antisocial others
    Hamlin, J. Kiley
    Wynn, Karen
    COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 26 (01) : 30 - 39
  • [49] Popularity in early adolescence: Prosocial and antisocial subtypes
    de Bruyn, Eddy H.
    Cillessen, Antonius H. N.
    JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT RESEARCH, 2006, 21 (06) : 607 - 627
  • [50] How Much Do Thoughts Count?: Preference for Emotion versus Principle in Judgments of Antisocial and Prosocial Behavior
    Fedotova, Natalie O.
    Fincher, Katrina M.
    Goodwin, Geoffrey P.
    Rozin, Paul
    EMOTION REVIEW, 2011, 3 (03) : 316 - 317