Asymmetrical genetic attributions for prosocial versus antisocial behaviour

被引:0
|
作者
Matthew S. Lebowitz
Kathryn Tabb
Paul S. Appelbaum
机构
[1] Columbia University Irving Medical Center,Center for Research on Ethical, Legal and Social Implications of Psychiatric, Neurologic and Behavioral Genetics, Department of Psychiatry
[2] Bard College,Philosophy Program
来源
Nature Human Behaviour | 2019年 / 3卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Genetic explanations of human behaviour are increasingly common. While genetic attributions for behaviour are often considered relevant for assessing blameworthiness, it has not yet been established whether judgements about blameworthiness can themselves impact genetic attributions. Across six studies, participants read about individuals engaging in prosocial or antisocial behaviour, and rated the extent to which they believed that genetics played a role in causing the behaviour. Antisocial behaviour was consistently rated as less genetically influenced than prosocial behaviour. This was true regardless of whether genetic explanations were explicitly provided or refuted. Mediation analyses suggested that this asymmetry may stem from people’s motivating desire to hold wrongdoers responsible for their actions. These findings suggest that those who seek to study or make use of genetic explanations’ influence on evaluations of, for example, antisocial behaviour should consider whether such explanations are accepted in the first place, given the possibility of motivated causal reasoning.
引用
收藏
页码:940 / 949
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Consequences of prosocial and antisocial behavior for the recipient
    Al-Yaaribi, Ali
    Kavussanu, Maria
    Ring, Christopher
    PSYCHOLOGY OF SPORT AND EXERCISE, 2016, 26 : 102 - 112
  • [33] Effects of PROSPER on the Influence Potential of Prosocial Versus Antisocial Youth in Adolescent Friendship Networks
    Osgood, D. Wayne
    Feinberg, Mark E.
    Gest, Scott D.
    Moody, James
    Ragan, Daniel T.
    Spoth, Richard
    Greenberg, Mark
    Redmond, Cleve
    JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 2013, 53 (02) : 174 - 179
  • [34] Susceptibility to prosocial and antisocial influence in adolescence
    Ahmed, S.
    Foulkes, L.
    Leung, J. T.
    Griffin, C.
    Sakhardande, A.
    Bennett, M.
    Dunning, D. L.
    Griffiths, K.
    Parker, J.
    Kuyken, W.
    Williams, J. M. G.
    Dalgleish, T.
    Blakemore, S. J.
    JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENCE, 2020, 84 : 56 - 68
  • [35] Editorial: Prosocial and antisocial behavior and personality
    Wong, Wong Ming
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [36] Children's sociomoral judgements of antisocial but not prosocial others depend on recipients' past moral behaviour
    Bocian, Konrad
    Myslinska Szarek, Katarzyna
    SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 30 (02) : 396 - 409
  • [37] Sportspersonship coaching behaviours, relatedness need satisfaction, and early adolescent athletes' prosocial and antisocial behaviour
    Bolter, Nicole D.
    Kipp, Lindsay E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORT AND EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 16 (01) : 20 - 35
  • [38] Prosocial and antisocial children's perceptions of peers' motives for prosocial behaviours
    Wardle, Georgina A.
    Hunter, Simon C.
    Warden, David
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 29 (03) : 396 - 408
  • [39] Introduction: Concepts of antisocial behaviour, of cause and of genetic influences - Discussion
    Hinde
    Rutter
    Denno
    Rowe
    Heath
    Goldman
    Bouchard
    Gottesman
    Mednick
    Waldman
    Taylor
    Carey
    GENETICS OF CRIMINAL AND ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOUR, 1996, 194 : 15 - 20
  • [40] Genetic correlation of antisocial behaviour with alcohol, nicotine, and cannabis use
    Tielbeek, Jorim J.
    Vink, Jacqueline M.
    Polderman, Tinca J. C.
    Popma, Arne
    Posthuma, Danielle
    Verweij, Karin J. H.
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2018, 187 : 296 - 299