Asymmetrical genetic attributions for prosocial versus antisocial behaviour

被引:0
|
作者
Matthew S. Lebowitz
Kathryn Tabb
Paul S. Appelbaum
机构
[1] Columbia University Irving Medical Center,Center for Research on Ethical, Legal and Social Implications of Psychiatric, Neurologic and Behavioral Genetics, Department of Psychiatry
[2] Bard College,Philosophy Program
来源
Nature Human Behaviour | 2019年 / 3卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Genetic explanations of human behaviour are increasingly common. While genetic attributions for behaviour are often considered relevant for assessing blameworthiness, it has not yet been established whether judgements about blameworthiness can themselves impact genetic attributions. Across six studies, participants read about individuals engaging in prosocial or antisocial behaviour, and rated the extent to which they believed that genetics played a role in causing the behaviour. Antisocial behaviour was consistently rated as less genetically influenced than prosocial behaviour. This was true regardless of whether genetic explanations were explicitly provided or refuted. Mediation analyses suggested that this asymmetry may stem from people’s motivating desire to hold wrongdoers responsible for their actions. These findings suggest that those who seek to study or make use of genetic explanations’ influence on evaluations of, for example, antisocial behaviour should consider whether such explanations are accepted in the first place, given the possibility of motivated causal reasoning.
引用
收藏
页码:940 / 949
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Asymmetrical genetic attributions for prosocial versus antisocial behaviour
    Lebowitz, Matthew S.
    Tabb, Kathryn
    Appelbaum, Paul S.
    NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR, 2019, 3 (09) : 940 - 949
  • [2] Asymmetric genetic attributions for one's own prosocial versus antisocial behavior
    Lebowitz, Matthew S.
    Tabb, Kathryn
    Appelbaum, Paul S.
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 164 (03): : 273 - 279
  • [3] ASYMMETRIC CAUSAL ATTRIBUTIONS TO ENVIRONMENTAL INFLUENCES FOR PROSOCIAL VERSUS ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOR
    Lebowitz, Matthew S.
    Tabb, Kathryn
    Appelbaum, Paul S.
    SOCIAL COGNITION, 2023, 41 (03) : 303 - 315
  • [4] Prosocial and antisocial behaviour in sport
    Kavussanu, Maria
    Al-Yaaribi, Ali
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORT AND EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 19 (02) : 179 - 202
  • [5] Prosocial and Antisocial Behaviour in School Sports
    Angel Latorre-Roman, Pedro
    Teresa Bueno-Cruz, Maria
    Martinez-Redondo, Melchor
    Salas-Sanchez, Jesus
    APUNTS EDUCACION FISICA Y DEPORTES, 2020, (139): : 10 - 18
  • [6] Asymmetrical effects of justice sensitivity perspectives on prosocial and antisocial behavior
    Gollwitzer M.
    Schmitt M.
    Schalke R.
    Maes J.
    Baer A.
    Social Justice Research, 2005, 18 (2) : 183 - 201
  • [7] Examining the relationship between religiousness and prosocial and antisocial behavior: Genetic versus environmental mediation
    Koenig, LB
    McGue, M
    Krueger, RF
    Bouchard, TJ
    BEHAVIOR GENETICS, 2003, 33 (06) : 708 - 709
  • [8] Predictors of Antisocial and Prosocial Behaviour of Bystanders in Workplace Mobbing
    Mulder, Roelie
    Pouwelse, Mieneke
    Lodewijkx, Hein
    Bos, Arjan E. R.
    van Dam, Karen
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY & APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 26 (03) : 207 - 220
  • [9] Asymmetrical attributions for approach versus avoidance behavior
    Greitemeyer, T
    Weiner, B
    PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2003, 29 (11) : 1371 - 1382
  • [10] SCHOOL AS A PROSOCIAL VERSUS ANTISOCIAL SPACE IN RELATION TO STUDENTS WITH ADHD
    Al-Khamisy, D.
    Kucharczyk, I.
    12TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE (INTED), 2018, : 9726 - 9734