nab-Paclitaxel for first-line treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer and poor prognostic factors: a retrospective analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Joyce O’Shaughnessy
William J. Gradishar
Paul Bhar
Jose Iglesias
机构
[1] Texas Oncology and The US Oncology Network,Baylor Sammons Cancer Center
[2] Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine,undefined
[3] Celgene Corporation,undefined
[4] Bionomics,undefined
[5] Ltd.,undefined
来源
关键词
-Paclitaxel; Visceral disease; Metastatic breast cancer; Taxanes;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) has demonstrated clinical benefit in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in a randomized phase III trial versus paclitaxel (CA012; N = 454) and in a randomized phase II trial versus docetaxel (CA024; N = 300). This retrospective analysis examines whether patients with poor prognostic factors demonstrate similar outcomes to the intent-to-treat (ITT) populations in these trials. This retrospective analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of previously untreated patients with MBC with the following poor prognostic factors: visceral dominant metastases and short disease-free interval (DFI; ≤2 years). In CA012 (n = 186 first-line patients), nab-paclitaxel demonstrated a significantly higher overall response rate (ORR) versus paclitaxel in patients with visceral dominant metastases (42 vs. 23 %; P = 0.022), whereas the higher ORR for nab-paclitaxel in patients with a short DFI (43 vs. 33 %; P = NS) was not statistically significant. In CA024, a significantly higher ORR for nab-paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 versus docetaxel was observed in patients with visceral dominant metastases (76 vs. 37 %; P < 0.001). No significant differences in ORR were observed in patients with a short DFI. Although progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival showed trends similar to ORR, statistical significance was only achieved for comparisons of PFS in patients with visceral dominant metastases in CA024 (13.1 months for nab-paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 vs. 7.8 months for docetaxel [P = 0.019] and 7.5 months for nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 [P = 0.010]). Safety results were similar to previous reports of the ITT populations. nab-Paclitaxel demonstrated similar efficacy in patients with poor prognostic factors as in the ITT populations of these two trials. In each trial, ORR was significantly higher for nab-paclitaxel versus the comparator taxane among patients with visceral dominant metastases.
引用
收藏
页码:829 / 837
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A retrospective analysis of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel for the treatment of metastatic cholangiocarcinoma.
    Mittra, Arjun
    Soyano, Aixa Elena
    Kung, Shu Ting
    Borad, Mitesh J.
    Alberts, Steven R.
    Mody, Kabir
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35
  • [42] First-Line Gemcitabine, Nab-Paclitaxel, and Oxaliplatin Chemotherapy With Itraconazole in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: A Single Institution Experience
    Sawasaki, Miyuki
    Tsubamoto, Hiroshi
    Sugihara, Ayako
    Ikuta, Shinichi
    Sakai, Yoshiyuki
    Osaki, Yukio
    Sonoda, Takashi
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2022, 42 (12) : 6063 - 6069
  • [43] Eligibility of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Patients for First-Line Palliative Intent nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine Versus FOLFIRINOX
    Peixoto, Renata D.
    Ho, Maria
    Renouf, Daniel J.
    Lim, Howard J.
    Gill, Sharlene
    Ruan, Jenny Y.
    Cheung, Winson Y.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2017, 40 (05): : 507 - 511
  • [44] Nab-Paclitaxel and Gemcitabine as First-line Treatment of Advanced or Metastatic Cholangiocarcinoma A Phase 2 Clinical Trial
    Sahai, Vaibhav
    Catalano, Paul J.
    Zalupski, Mark M.
    Lubner, Sam Joseph
    Menge, Mark R.
    Nimeiri, Halla Sayed
    Munshi, Hidayatullah G.
    Benson, Al Bowen, III
    O'Dwyer, Peter J.
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2018, 4 (12) : 1707 - 1712
  • [45] Nab-Paclitaxel Monotherapy as a Treatment of Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer in Routine Clinical Practice
    Aigner, Julia
    Marme, Frederik
    Smetanay, Katharina
    Schuetz, Florian
    Jaeger, Dirk
    Schneeweiss, Andreas
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 33 (08) : 3407 - 3413
  • [46] Updated results of biweekly gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel as first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer
    Kokkali, S.
    Drizou, M.
    Tripodaki, E.
    Stefanou, D.
    Magou, E.
    Zylis, D.
    Kapiris, M.
    Nasi, D.
    Georganta, C.
    Ardavanis, A.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2018, 29
  • [47] Significantly Longer Progression-Free Survival With nab-Paclitaxel Compared With Docetaxel As First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer
    Gradishar, William J.
    Krasnojon, Dimitry
    Cheporov, Sergey
    Makhson, Anatoly N.
    Manikhas, Georgiy M.
    Clawson, Alicia
    Bhar, Paul
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (22) : 3611 - 3619
  • [48] Sindilimab combined with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine as first-line treatment for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.
    Zhu, Huayun
    Sun, Xiaofeng
    Pan, Xuan
    Wu, Pingping
    Chen, Jia
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 39 (15)
  • [49] Combination carboplatin and nab-paclitaxel as a first-line treatment for advanced thymic carcinoma
    Hiroya Manaka
    Satoshi Igawa
    Michiko Yamamoto
    Akito Oguri
    Hideaki Manabe
    Masashi Kasajima
    Seiichiro Kusuhara
    Shinji Hosotani
    Yoshiro Nakahara
    Takashi Sato
    Tomoya Fukui
    Mitsufuji Hisashi
    Jiichiro Sasaki
    Katsuhiko Naoki
    Investigational New Drugs, 2023, 41 : 115 - 121
  • [50] First-Line Treatment With Atezolizumab Plus Nab-Paclitaxel for Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
    Weng, Xiuhua
    Huang, Xiaoting
    Li, Hongchao
    Lin, Shen
    Rao, Xin
    Guo, Xianzhong
    Huang, Pinfang
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2020, 43 (05): : 340 - 348