nab-Paclitaxel for first-line treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer and poor prognostic factors: a retrospective analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Joyce O’Shaughnessy
William J. Gradishar
Paul Bhar
Jose Iglesias
机构
[1] Texas Oncology and The US Oncology Network,Baylor Sammons Cancer Center
[2] Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine,undefined
[3] Celgene Corporation,undefined
[4] Bionomics,undefined
[5] Ltd.,undefined
来源
关键词
-Paclitaxel; Visceral disease; Metastatic breast cancer; Taxanes;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) has demonstrated clinical benefit in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in a randomized phase III trial versus paclitaxel (CA012; N = 454) and in a randomized phase II trial versus docetaxel (CA024; N = 300). This retrospective analysis examines whether patients with poor prognostic factors demonstrate similar outcomes to the intent-to-treat (ITT) populations in these trials. This retrospective analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of previously untreated patients with MBC with the following poor prognostic factors: visceral dominant metastases and short disease-free interval (DFI; ≤2 years). In CA012 (n = 186 first-line patients), nab-paclitaxel demonstrated a significantly higher overall response rate (ORR) versus paclitaxel in patients with visceral dominant metastases (42 vs. 23 %; P = 0.022), whereas the higher ORR for nab-paclitaxel in patients with a short DFI (43 vs. 33 %; P = NS) was not statistically significant. In CA024, a significantly higher ORR for nab-paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 versus docetaxel was observed in patients with visceral dominant metastases (76 vs. 37 %; P < 0.001). No significant differences in ORR were observed in patients with a short DFI. Although progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival showed trends similar to ORR, statistical significance was only achieved for comparisons of PFS in patients with visceral dominant metastases in CA024 (13.1 months for nab-paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 vs. 7.8 months for docetaxel [P = 0.019] and 7.5 months for nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 [P = 0.010]). Safety results were similar to previous reports of the ITT populations. nab-Paclitaxel demonstrated similar efficacy in patients with poor prognostic factors as in the ITT populations of these two trials. In each trial, ORR was significantly higher for nab-paclitaxel versus the comparator taxane among patients with visceral dominant metastases.
引用
收藏
页码:829 / 837
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A randomized phase 3 trial of Gemcitabine or Nab-paclitaxel combined with cisPlatin as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer
    Biyun Wang
    Tao Sun
    Yannan Zhao
    Shusen Wang
    Jian Zhang
    Zhonghua Wang
    Yue-E Teng
    Li Cai
    Min Yan
    Xiaojia Wang
    Zefei Jiang
    Yueyin Pan
    Jianfeng Luo
    Zhimin Shao
    Jiong Wu
    Xiaomao Guo
    Xichun Hu
    Nature Communications, 13
  • [32] Nab-paclitaxel plus platinum versus paclitaxel plus platinum as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer
    Liu, Yuan
    Fang, Shan-shan
    Zhao, Run-sheng
    Liu, Bo
    Jin, Yi-qiang
    Li, Quan
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 150 (06)
  • [33] Retrospective Analysis of the Relative Efficacy and Toxicity of Nab-paclitaxel and Docetaxel in Metastatic Breast Cancer
    Howell, S. J.
    Armstrong, A. C.
    Ashcroft, L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 48 : S115 - S116
  • [34] Randomized phase II study of nab-paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy in patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer
    Tamura, Kenji
    Inoue, Kenichi
    Masuda, Norikazu
    Takao, Shintaro
    Kashiwaba, Masahiro
    Tokuda, Yutaka
    Iwata, Hiroji
    Yamamoto, Naohito
    Aogi, Kenjiro
    Saeki, Toshiaki
    Nakayama, Takahiro
    Sato, Nobuaki
    Toyama, Tatsuya
    Ishida, Takanori
    Arioka, Hitoshi
    Saito, Mitsue
    Ohno, Shinji
    Yamauchi, Hideko
    Yamada, Kimito
    Watanabe, Junichiro
    Ishiguro, Hiroshi
    Fujiwara, Yasuhiro
    CANCER SCIENCE, 2017, 108 (05): : 987 - 994
  • [35] Efficacy and toxicity comparison of nab-paclitaxel plus S-1 and nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic pancreatic cancer
    Guo Xi
    Xu Yaolin
    Ji Yuan
    Fan Yue
    Wang Dansong
    Jin Dayong
    Zhuang Rongyuan
    Wu Lili
    Lou Wenhui
    Zhou Yuhong
    Department of Medical Oncology
    Department of General Surgery
    Department of Pathology
    Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine
    Department of Radiotherapy
    胰腺病学杂志(英文), 2020, 03 (01) : 35 - 41
  • [36] Comparative effectiveness of first-line nab-paclitaxel versus paclitaxel monotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer
    Luhn, Patricia
    Chui, Stephen Y.
    Hsieh, Fu-Chi
    Yi, Jingbo
    Mecke, Almut
    Bajaj, Preeti S.
    Hasnain, Waseem
    Falgas, Adeline
    Ton, Thanh G. N.
    Kurian, Allison W.
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2019, 8 (14) : 1173 - 1185
  • [37] AN INDIRECT TREATMENT COMPARISON AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS COMPARING FOLFIRINOX WITH NAB-PACLITAXEL PLUS GEMCITABINE FOR FIRST-LINE TREATMENT FOR PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC PANCREATIC CANCER
    Hollmann, S.
    Alloul, K.
    Attard, C.
    Kavan, P.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2014, 25 : 11 - 11
  • [38] Comparative effectiveness of FOLFIRINOX (FOL) versus gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GNP) for the first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer
    Cheng, Wei-Han
    Sadeghi, Sarmad
    Lenz, Heinz-Josef
    Hay, Joel W.
    Barzi, Afsaneh
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (04)
  • [39] Biomarker analysis of lapatinib with paclitaxel versus paclitaxel as first-line treatment in 580 patients with metastatic breast cancer
    Finn, R. S.
    Press, M. F.
    Dering, J.
    Gomez, H.
    Aziz, Z.
    Arbushites, M.
    Koehler, M.
    Oliva, C.
    Williams, L. S.
    Di Leo, A.
    EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2007, 5 (04): : 212 - 212
  • [40] Nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine for the treatment of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer
    Borazanci, Erkut
    Von Hoff, Daniel D.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2014, 8 (07) : 739 - 747