Population MCMC methods for history matching and uncertainty quantification

被引:0
|
作者
Linah Mohamed
Ben Calderhead
Maurizio Filippone
Mike Christie
Mark Girolami
机构
[1] Heriot-Watt University,Institute of Petroleum Engineering
[2] University College London,Department of Statistical Science
来源
Computational Geosciences | 2012年 / 16卷
关键词
History matching; Uncertainty quantification; MCMC methods; Population MCMC;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper presents the application of a population Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) technique to generate history-matched models. The technique has been developed and successfully adopted in challenging domains such as computational biology but has not yet seen application in reservoir modelling. In population MCMC, multiple Markov chains are run on a set of response surfaces that form a bridge from the prior to posterior. These response surfaces are formed from the product of the prior with the likelihood raised to a varying power less than one. The chains exchange positions, with the probability of a swap being governed by a standard Metropolis accept/reject step, which allows for large steps to be taken with high probability. We show results of Population MCMC on the IC Fault Model—a simple three-parameter model that is known to have a highly irregular misfit surface and hence be difficult to match. Our results show that population MCMC is able to generate samples from the complex, multi-modal posterior probability distribution of the IC Fault model very effectively. By comparison, previous results from stochastic sampling algorithms often focus on only part of the region of high posterior probability depending on algorithm settings and starting points.
引用
收藏
页码:423 / 436
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Basic Framework and Main Methods of Uncertainty Quantification
    Zhang, Juan
    Yin, Junping
    Wang, Ruili
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2020, 2020
  • [42] FEM based Methods for Uncertainty Quantification in Electromagnetics
    Jos, K. T. Gladwin
    Vinoy, K. J.
    [J]. 2018 IEEE INDIAN CONFERENCE ON ANTENNAS & PROPOGATION (INCAP), 2018,
  • [43] Methods for the Uncertainty Quantification of Aircraft Simulation Models
    Rosic, Bojana V.
    Diekmann, Jobst H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2015, 52 (04): : 1247 - 1255
  • [44] Uncertainty due to the quantification step in analytical methods
    Galban, Javier
    Ubide, Carlos
    [J]. TALANTA, 2007, 71 (03) : 1339 - 1344
  • [45] Comparison of uncertainty quantification methods for cloud simulation
    Janjic, T.
    Lukacova-Medvidova, M.
    Ruckstuhl, Y.
    Wiebe, B.
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2023, 149 (756) : 2895 - 2910
  • [46] Calibration under Uncertainty Using Bayesian Emulation and History Matching: Methods and Illustration on a Building Energy Model
    Domingo, Dario
    Royapoor, Mohammad
    Du, Hailiang
    Boranian, Aaron
    Walker, Sara
    Goldstein, Michael
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2024, 17 (16)
  • [47] A model-independent iterative ensemble smoother for efficient history-matching and uncertainty quantification in very high dimensions
    White, Jeremy T.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2018, 109 : 191 - 201
  • [48] Local and global timeseries proxies using functional principal component analysis: application to history-matching and uncertainty quantification
    Hamidreza Hamdi
    Christopher R. Clarkson
    Mario Costa Sousa
    [J]. Computational Geosciences, 2024, 28 : 305 - 321
  • [49] Efficient sampling techniques for uncertainty quantification in history matching using nonlinear error models and ensemble level upscaling techniques
    Efendiev, Y.
    Datta-Gupta, A.
    Ma, X.
    Mallick, B.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2009, 45
  • [50] Local and global timeseries proxies using functional principal component analysis: application to history-matching and uncertainty quantification
    Hamdi, Hamidreza
    Clarkson, Christopher R.
    Sousa, Mario Costa
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL GEOSCIENCES, 2024, 28 (02) : 305 - 321