Online accommodation booking: what information matters the most to users?

被引:0
|
作者
Lee Yen Chaw
Chun Meng Tang
机构
[1] UCSI University,
[2] Kuala Lumpur Campus,undefined
[3] James Cook University,undefined
[4] Singapore Campus,undefined
来源
关键词
Online accommodation booking; Trusting intentions; Trust-related behaviours; Warranting theory; Web trust model;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
One of the key things travellers do when planning a trip is to go online to search for and book the right accommodation. Accommodation booking websites such as Agoda, Booking.com, and Expedia provide a range of accommodation options and relevant information, such as rates, star ratings, customer review ratings, reviewers’ comments, reservation policies, facilities, and so on. This study examined what and how information provided by accommodation providers on accommodation booking websites influences travellers in their decision-making before they make an actual booking. This study developed a model, based on Walther and Parks’ (Handbook of interpersonal communication. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 529–563, 2002) Warranting Theory, and McKnight et al.’s (J Strateg Inf Syst 11:297–323, 2002a) Web Trust Model, to examine how the warranting value of accommodation information affected travellers’ trusting intentions, and how these trusting intentions affected their trust-related behaviours. An online questionnaire survey collected responses from travellers who had previously booked accommodation using an accommodation booking website. Partial least squares analyses of 94 responses showed that there was a statistically significant positive relationship between warranting value of accommodation information and trusting intentions, as well as between trusting intentions and trust-related behaviours. However, trusting intentions had negligible and insignificant mediating effect between warranting value of accommodation information and trust-related behaviours. The findings of this study can help online accommodation booking websites and accommodation providers to understand what and how they can leverage information to sufficiently influence travellers’ trusting intentions and eventually entice travellers to make an actual booking.
引用
收藏
页码:369 / 390
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] What publics do online matters: Internet use and political information behaviors
    Kim, Jarim
    Kim, Yesolran
    [J]. ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW, 2022, 46 (05) : 867 - 885
  • [42] What Matters Most in Online SAP-Enabled Course Learning? A System View of Determinants
    Zhao, Yu
    Bandyopadhyay, Kakoli
    Bandyopadhyay, Soumava
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 52ND ANNUAL HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2019, : 7583 - 7591
  • [43] THE FUTURE OF FULL TEXT PRIMARY INFORMATION ONLINE - WHAT USERS REALLY WANT
    HAMMOND, SE
    HEARTY, JA
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1990, 199 : 15 - CINF
  • [44] Assessing Competence for Reentry What Matters Most?
    Steadman, Randolph H.
    Cole, Daniel J.
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2013, 119 (01) : 16 - 18
  • [45] What matters most: Quality or shipping schedules?
    Leonard, T
    [J]. QUALITY PROGRESS, 2001, 34 (02) : 10 - 10
  • [46] CBC DESIGN FOR PRACTITIONERS: WHAT MATTERS MOST
    Huber, Joel
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE SAWTOOTH SOFTWARE CONFERENCE 2012, 2012, : 207 - 221
  • [47] Medical aid in dying: What matters most?
    Tanuseputro, Peter
    [J]. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2017, 189 (03) : E99 - E100
  • [48] What matters most: quantifying an epidemiology of consequence
    Keyes, Katherine
    Galea, Sandro
    [J]. ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 25 (05) : 305 - 311
  • [49] Cemented femoral stems - What matters most
    Berry, DJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2004, 19 (04): : 83 - 84
  • [50] Size or shape - What matters most at the nanoscale?
    Popescu, I.
    Hristache, M.
    Ciobanu, S. -S.
    Barseghyan, M. G.
    Vinasco, J. A.
    Morales, A. L.
    Radu, A.
    Duque, C. A.
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2019, 165 : 13 - 22