Size or shape - What matters most at the nanoscale?

被引:8
|
作者
Popescu, I. [1 ]
Hristache, M. [2 ]
Ciobanu, S. -S. [3 ]
Barseghyan, M. G. [4 ]
Vinasco, J. A. [5 ]
Morales, A. L. [5 ]
Radu, A. [5 ]
Duque, C. A. [5 ]
机构
[1] Microsoft, 725 Granville St, Vancouver, BC V7Y 1L1, Canada
[2] ING Tech Romania, Tipografilor 11-15,Sect 1, RO-013714 Bucharest, Romania
[3] Univ Politehn Bucuresti, Dept Phys, 313 Splaiul Independentei, RO-060042 Bucharest, Romania
[4] Yerevan State Univ, Dept Solid State Phys, Yerevan 0025, Armenia
[5] Univ Antioquia UdeA, Fac Ciencias Exactas & Nat, Inst Fis, Grp Mat Condensada UdeA, Calle 70 52-21, Medellin, Colombia
关键词
Nanoscale; Symmetry; Quantum dots; Excited levels; Dipole matrix elements; Oscillator strength; QUANTUM DOTS; OPTICAL-PROPERTIES; INCLUSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.04.021
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Bidimensional quantum dots with different shapes and areas are considered and the Schrodinger equation is used within a finite element method to calculate electron energies and localization probabilities. At the nanoscale, shape may not be as important as the size is. Our work proves that studying quantum effects in some particularly symmetrical structures may be very conclusive for other symmetries as well. Quantities relevant for intraband optics may be further obtained by using the electric-dipole matrix formalism. The dots area is proposed as a quantitative criterion to compare the results obtained for different and regular shapes. It is found that the majority of differently-shaped quantum dots behave electronically and optically in a remarkably similar manner. No matter the shape, any regular polygonal quantum dot with more than four sides and a given area has just the same quantitative optoelectronic properties.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 22
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] What Matters Most Is Not the Size of the "Storm" but the Scale of the Impact
    Cant, Dominique
    [J]. MEETING SECURITY CHALLENGES THROUGH DATA ANALYTICS AND DECISION SUPPORT, 2016, 47 : 143 - 146
  • [2] 'What Matters Most'
    Gautier, A
    [J]. SHENANDOAH, 2004, 54 (01): : 40 - 55
  • [3] What matters most
    Adams, Keddy
    Ashe, Gerald P.
    Chisholm, Janice
    Daws, Tanja
    Green, Stefanie
    Holland, Tim
    Hopwood, Marie-Clare
    Marmoreo, Jean
    McDiarmid, Adam
    Morcom, Rick
    Pewarchuk, Jesse A.
    Reggler, Jonathan
    Perrot, Chantal
    Rudnik, James
    Smith, Pat
    Sun, Christopher
    Trouton, Konia
    Weiss, Edward S.
    de Wet, Francois
    Wiebe, Ellen
    Yoshida, Lianne
    [J]. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2017, 189 (17) : E642 - E642
  • [4] What matters most
    Whetten, DA
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2001, 26 (02): : 175 - 178
  • [5] What Matters Most
    Feder, Helena
    [J]. WOMENS STUDIES-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2021, 50 (08): : 771 - 775
  • [6] What Matters Most
    Gandhi, Rajiv
    Liu, Spencer S.
    Brull, Richard
    [J]. REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2013, 38 (04) : 257 - 258
  • [7] Size matters in nanoscale communication
    Zijlstra, Andries
    Di Vizio, Dolores
    [J]. NATURE CELL BIOLOGY, 2018, 20 (03) : 228 - 230
  • [8] Size matters in nanoscale communication
    Andries Zijlstra
    Dolores Di Vizio
    [J]. Nature Cell Biology, 2018, 20 : 228 - 230
  • [9] Doing what matters most
    Bakken, Suzanne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2019, 26 (01) : 1 - 2
  • [10] Entrepreneurship: What matters most
    Rosado-Cubero, Ana
    Freire-Rubio, Teresa
    Hernandez, Adolfo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2022, 144 : 250 - 263