Maintenance therapy with mycophenolate mofetil for children with severe lupus nephritis after low-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide regimen

被引:0
|
作者
Shuichiro Fujinaga
Yoshiyuki Ohtomo
Satoshi Hara
Daisuke Umino
Tomonosuke Someya
Toshiaki Shimizu
Kazunari Kaneko
机构
[1] Saitama Children’s Medical Center,Division of Nephrology
[2] Juntendo Nerima Hospital,Department of Pediatrics
[3] Juntendo University School of Medicine,Department of Pediatrics
[4] Kansai Medical University,Department of Pediatrics
来源
Pediatric Nephrology | 2008年 / 23卷
关键词
Maintenance therapy; Mycophenolate mofetil; Lupus nephritis; Intravenous cyclophosphamide;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Although recent studies on adults with lupus nephritis indicate that mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) may be effective in maintaining remission for patients who previously received short-term intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVCY) induction therapy, the experience with the new immunosuppressive agent in children with severe lupus nephritis has not been as satisfactory thus far. To assess the efficacy and safety of maintenance therapy with MMF, we prospectively analyzed four patients with biopsy-proven severe lupus nephritis (three girls, one boy; mean age 12 years; two with class IIIA, two with class IVG(A); mean duration of lupus nephritis 7 months) receiving MMF for at least 6 months after induction treatment. These patients had been treated previously with 6 months of low-dose IVCY combined with oral mizoribine and steroids for induction, followed by therapy with MMF adjusted to maintain predose mycophenolic acid (C0-MPA) levels at 2–5 mcg/ml. Mean follow-up after staring MMF was 27.5 months (range 6–41). The mean MMF dose required was 405 ± 49 mg/m2 per 12 h, which maintained mean C0-MPA levels of 3.3 ± 0.41 mcg/ml. No patient experienced renal flares during maintenance therapy with MMF, which permitted a significant reduction in mean prednisolone dose from 11.9 ± 1.3 to 3.9 ± 2.6 mg/day (P = 0.003). No significant gastrointestinal or hematologic side effects of MMF were noted. This preliminary study demonstrates that maintenance therapy with MMF after a low-dose IVCY regimen appears to be a promising intervention without adverse effects in children with severe lupus nephritis. These data should be confirmed by a prospective randomized multicenter clinical trial.
引用
收藏
页码:1877 / 1882
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Mycophenolate mofetil (MPA) versus intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVCYP) in the remission of lupus nephritis (LN)
    Goh, S. M.
    Tan, T.
    Tan, S. H.
    Liew, A.
    [J]. NEPHROLOGY, 2008, 13 : A50 - A50
  • [42] Multicenter controlled trial of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) vs. intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVC) as induction therapy for severe lupus nephritis (LN)
    Appel, G
    Ginzler, E
    Radhakrishnan, J
    Aranow, C
    Buyon, J
    Dooley, M
    Merrill, J
    Petri, M
    Gilkeson, G
    Wallace, D
    Weisman, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2003, 14 : 38A - 38A
  • [43] Induction therapy for active lupus nephritis:: mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclophosphamide -: Commentary
    Burchardi, Christian
    Schloendorff, Detlef
    [J]. NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE NEPHROLOGY, 2006, 2 (06): : 314 - 315
  • [44] Mycophenolate mofetil vs cyclophosphamide therapy for patients with diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis
    Hu, WX
    Liu, ZH
    Chen, HP
    Tang, Z
    Wang, QW
    Shen, KQ
    Li, LS
    [J]. CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 115 (05) : 705 - 709
  • [45] INDUCTION THERAPY FOR PEDIATRIC ONSET LUPUS NEPHRITIS : MYCOPHENOLATE MOFETIL VERSUS CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE
    Eveillard, Laurye-anne
    Chbihi, Marwa
    Riller, Quentin
    Rabant, Marion
    Dehoux, Laurene
    Charbit, Marina
    Biebuyck, Nathalie
    Avramescu, Marina
    Bader-Meunier, Brigitte
    Boyer, Olivia
    [J]. PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY, 2021, 36 (10) : 3378 - 3378
  • [46] INTRAVENOUS PULSE CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE THERAPY IN SEVERE LUPUS NEPHRITIS
    FRUTOS, MA
    RIVILLA, A
    GARCIA, I
    BURGOS, D
    VALERA, A
    MARTINREYES, G
    CABELLO, M
    DENOVALES, EL
    [J]. NEFROLOGIA, 1990, 10 : 88 - 93
  • [47] Outcomes in Lupus Nephritis Patients Previously Randomized to Receive Either Low Dose Cyclophosphamide Versus Oral Mycophenolate Mofetil on Azathioprine Maintenance
    Rathi, Manish
    Jaryal, Ajay
    Goyal, Ajay
    Sharma, Aman
    Gupta, Pramod
    Gupta, Krishan
    [J]. ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2015, 67
  • [48] Randomized controlled trial of pulse intravenous cyclophosphamide versus mycophenolate mofetil in the induction therapy of proliferative lupus nephritis
    Ong, LM
    Hooi, LS
    Lim, TO
    Goh, BL
    Ahmad, G
    Ghazalli, R
    Teo, SM
    Wong, HS
    Tan, SY
    Shaariah, W
    Tan, CC
    Morad, Z
    [J]. NEPHROLOGY, 2005, 10 (05) : 504 - 510
  • [49] Comment on: Efficacy and Safety of Mycophenolate Mofetil versus Intravenous Pulse Cyclophosphamide as Induction Therapy in Proliferative Lupus Nephritis
    Ziaie, Shadi
    Moradi, Omid
    Saffaei, Ali
    [J]. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2019, 13 (05) : 347 - 347
  • [50] RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF PULSE INTRAVENOUS CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE VERSUS MYCOPHENOLATE MOFETIL IN THE INDUCTION THERAPY OF PROLIFERATIVE LUPUS NEPHRITIS
    Ong, Loke Meng
    Hooi, Lai Seong
    Lim, Teck Onn
    Goh, Bak Leong
    Ahmad, Ghazali
    Ghazalli, Rozina
    Teo, Sue Mei
    Wong, Hin Seng
    Tan, Si Yen
    Shaariah, Wan
    Tan, Chwee Choon
    Morad, Zaki
    [J]. NEPHROLOGY, 2005, 10 : A121 - A121