Evaluation of digital economy development level based on multi-attribute decision theory

被引:8
|
作者
Su, Jinqi [1 ]
Su, Ke [1 ]
Wang, Shubin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Xian Univ Posts & Telecommun, Sch Econ & Management, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Res Ctr Chinese Management, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
来源
PLOS ONE | 2022年 / 17卷 / 10期
关键词
INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; UTILITY-THEORY; VIKOR METHOD; GROWTH; INFRASTRUCTURE; INTEGRATION; WEIGHTS; AHP;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0270859
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The maturity and commercialization of emerging digital technologies represented by artificial intelligence, cloud computing, block chain and virtual reality are giving birth to a new and higher economic form, that is, digital economy. Digital economy is different from the traditional industrial economy. It is clean, efficient, green and recyclable. It represents and promotes the future direction of global economic development, especially in the context of the sudden COVID-19 pandemic as a continuing disaster. Therefore, it is essential to establish the comprehensive evaluation model of digital economy development scientifically and reasonably. In this paper, first on the basis of literature analysis, the relevant indicators of digital economy development are collected manually and then screened by the grey dynamic clustering and rough set reduction theory. The evaluation index system of digital economy development is constructed from four dimensions: digital innovation impetus support, digital infrastructure construction support, national economic environment and digital policy guarantee, digital integration and application. Next the subjective weight and objective weight are calculated by the group FAHP method, entropy method and improved CRITIC method, and the combined weight is integrated with the thought of maximum variance. The grey correlation analysis and improved VIKOR model are combined to systematically evaluate the digital economy development level of 31 provinces and cities in China from 2013 to 2019. The results of empirical analysis show that the overall development of China's digital economy shows a trend of superposition and rise, and the development of digital economy in the four major economic zones is unbalanced. Finally, we put forward targeted opinions on the construction of China's provincial digital economy.
引用
收藏
页数:39
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comprehensive Evaluation of the Value of Stock Investment Based on the Multi-attribute Decision Theory
    Wei Zhonglong
    Wang Xiaoyi
    Wang Jingping
    [J]. COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION OF ECONOMY AND SOCIETY WITH STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 2010, : 221 - +
  • [2] DYNAMIC MULTI-ATTRIBUTE EVALUATION OF DIGITAL ECONOMY DEVELOPMENT IN CHINA: A PERSPECTIVE FROM INTERACTION EFFECT
    Xiao, Qinzi
    Gao, Mingyun
    Chen, Lin
    Jiang, Juncheng
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2023, 29 (06) : 1728 - 1752
  • [3] Study of Multi-attribute Comprehensive Evaluation method based on Attribute Theory
    Xu Guanglin
    Liu Nianzu
    [J]. 2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT OF E-COMMERCE AND E-GOVERNMENT (ICMECG), 2014, : 6 - 10
  • [4] Multi-attribute Group Decision Making Method Based on Evidence Theory
    Li, Yan-Ling
    Yan, Qi-Fei
    Wu, Jian-Wei
    [J]. 2017 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NATURAL COMPUTATION, FUZZY SYSTEMS AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY (ICNC-FSKD), 2017, : 3043 - 3047
  • [5] Performance Evaluation Based on Entropy Weight Multi-Attribute Group Decision
    Hu, Dongbo
    Luo, Fei
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2012 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT INNOVATION AND PUBLIC POLICY (ICMIPP 2012), VOLS 1-6, 2012, : 2522 - 2524
  • [6] Anomaly Detection Based on Multi-Attribute Decision
    Zeng, QingPeng
    Wu, ShuiXiu
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2009 WRI GLOBAL CONGRESS ON INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, VOL II, 2009, : 394 - +
  • [7] Evaluation of the Innovation Level for Technological Enterprises: Multi-attribute Decision-making Based on Vague Sets
    Zhu, Xianglin
    Yang, Naiding
    Zhang, Mingzhen
    [J]. 2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (IEEE IEEM21), 2021, : 563 - 567
  • [8] Tri-level multi-attribute group decision making based on regret theory in multi-granular linguistic contexts
    Wang, Zelin
    Wang, Ying-Ming
    Wang, Liang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2018, 35 (01) : 793 - 806
  • [9] MULTI-ATTRIBUTE DECISION MAKING BASED ON LABEL SEMANTICS
    Lawry, Jonathan
    He, Hongmei
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UNCERTAINTY FUZZINESS AND KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2008, 16 : 69 - 86
  • [10] An explainable multi-attribute decision model based on argumentation
    Zhong, Qiaoting
    Fan, Xiuyi
    Luo, Xudong
    Toni, Francesca
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2019, 117 : 42 - 61