Evaluation of digital economy development level based on multi-attribute decision theory

被引:8
|
作者
Su, Jinqi [1 ]
Su, Ke [1 ]
Wang, Shubin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Xian Univ Posts & Telecommun, Sch Econ & Management, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Res Ctr Chinese Management, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
来源
PLOS ONE | 2022年 / 17卷 / 10期
关键词
INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; UTILITY-THEORY; VIKOR METHOD; GROWTH; INFRASTRUCTURE; INTEGRATION; WEIGHTS; AHP;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0270859
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The maturity and commercialization of emerging digital technologies represented by artificial intelligence, cloud computing, block chain and virtual reality are giving birth to a new and higher economic form, that is, digital economy. Digital economy is different from the traditional industrial economy. It is clean, efficient, green and recyclable. It represents and promotes the future direction of global economic development, especially in the context of the sudden COVID-19 pandemic as a continuing disaster. Therefore, it is essential to establish the comprehensive evaluation model of digital economy development scientifically and reasonably. In this paper, first on the basis of literature analysis, the relevant indicators of digital economy development are collected manually and then screened by the grey dynamic clustering and rough set reduction theory. The evaluation index system of digital economy development is constructed from four dimensions: digital innovation impetus support, digital infrastructure construction support, national economic environment and digital policy guarantee, digital integration and application. Next the subjective weight and objective weight are calculated by the group FAHP method, entropy method and improved CRITIC method, and the combined weight is integrated with the thought of maximum variance. The grey correlation analysis and improved VIKOR model are combined to systematically evaluate the digital economy development level of 31 provinces and cities in China from 2013 to 2019. The results of empirical analysis show that the overall development of China's digital economy shows a trend of superposition and rise, and the development of digital economy in the four major economic zones is unbalanced. Finally, we put forward targeted opinions on the construction of China's provincial digital economy.
引用
收藏
页数:39
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Decision-Making Based on Multi-Attribute Value Theory Under Preference Uncertainty
    Shakirov, Vladislav
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR INTELLIGENT DECISION MAKING SUPPORT (ITIDS 2019), 2019, 166 : 177 - 183
  • [22] Effects on decision quality of supporting multi-attribute evaluation in groups
    Timmermans, D
    Vlek, C
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1996, 68 (02) : 158 - 170
  • [23] Multi-attribute decision-making based on soft set theory: a systematic review
    Khameneh, Azadeh Zahedi
    Kilicman, Adem
    [J]. SOFT COMPUTING, 2019, 23 (16) : 6899 - 6920
  • [24] A location choosing model of inhomogeneous space based on multi-attribute decision making theory
    Xu Jiansheng
    Ge Zhiyuan
    Chen Cheng
    [J]. SYSTEMS, ORGANIZATIONS AND MANAGEMENT: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD WORKSHOP OF INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY IN SCIENTIFIC INVENTIONS, 2009, : 221 - 230
  • [25] Research on the stochastic hybrid multi-attribute decision making method based on prospect theory
    Yu, H.
    Liu, P.
    Jin, F.
    [J]. SCIENTIA IRANICA, 2014, 21 (03) : 1105 - 1119
  • [26] Multi-attribute decision-making based on soft set theory: a systematic review
    Azadeh Zahedi Khameneh
    Adem Kılıçman
    [J]. Soft Computing, 2019, 23 : 6899 - 6920
  • [27] Research on the stochastic hybrid multi-attribute decision making method based on prospect theory
    [J]. Liu, P. (peide.liu@gmail.com), 1600, Sharif University of Technology (21):
  • [28] Multi-attribute group decision of engineering project bid evaluation based on cloud model
    Hu, Yungang
    Li, Cunbin
    Gao, Po
    [J]. BASIC & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 2019, 125 : 107 - 107
  • [29] Risk evaluation of urban infrastructure accident based on multi-attribute decision making method
    Liu, Ke-Hui
    Zhu, Wei
    [J]. Beijing Ligong Daxue Xuebao/Transaction of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2014, 34 : 136 - 139
  • [30] Description and First Evaluation of an Approach for a Pilot Decision Support System Based on Multi-attribute Decision Making
    Djartov, Boris
    Mostaghim, Sanaz
    Papenfuss, Anne
    Wies, Matthias
    [J]. 2022 IEEE SYMPOSIUM SERIES ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE (SSCI), 2022, : 141 - 147