Comparison of Positive Matrix Factorization and Multilinear Engine for the source apportionment of particulate pollutants

被引:70
|
作者
Ramadan, Z
Eickhout, B
Song, XH
Buydens, LMC
Hopke, PK
机构
[1] Clarkson Univ, Dept Chem Engn, Potsdam, NY 13699 USA
[2] Univ Nijmegen, Analyt Chem Lab, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
Positive Matrix Factorization; Multilinear Engine; particulate pollutants;
D O I
10.1016/S0169-7439(02)00160-0
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
New approaches to solving the factor analysis (FA) problem have recently been developed by recognizing that factor analysis is fundamentally a least-squares (LS) problem. This approach is called Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF). Two programs have been written to implement different algorithms for solving the problem. These programs are PMF2 and Multilinear Engine (ME-2). The two programs use different algorithms to obtain the least-squares solution and the constraints are imposed in different ways. Elemental composition data for particle samples collected in Phoenix, AZ from June 1996 through June 1998, were used to compare the source apportionment of these two programs. The ME-2 results presented in this paper are compared with the previously published PMF2 results. The identification of the eight PMF sources returned one questionable source: wood burning and some peculiar mass contributions. The extra features of ME-2 made it possible to also investigate the sources responsible for the fine particles. The mixed-way approach indicated the existence of incinerators in the Phoenix area. Like PMF, ME-2 identified high source contributions for biomass burning, motor vehicles (with higher contribution in winter), coal-fired power plants (secondary particles with higher contributions in summer), soil, and nonferrous smelting process. Sea salt and heavy-duty diesel were identified by the ME two-way analysis, but they disappeared in the three-way analysis of the dual fine particle sequential sampler (DFPSS) and DICHOT data. Instead, an obvious incinerator source was identified again. Thus, PMF and ME-2 identified the same major sources responsible for the PM2.5 in Phoenix, but some of the sources identified by PMF2 appear to be uncertain. The three-way analysis provided additional information about possible sources, but also returned unexplainable sources. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 28
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Source apportionment of stack emissions from research and development facilities using positive matrix factorization
    [J]. Ballinger, M.Y. (marcel.ballinger@pnnl.gov), 1600, Elsevier Ltd (98):
  • [42] Preliminary Source Apportionment of Ambient VOCs Measured in Seoul Metropolitan Area by Positive Matrix Factorization
    Han, J. S.
    Moon, K. J.
    Kim, R. H.
    Shin, S. A.
    Hong, Y. D.
    Jung, I. R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF KOREAN SOCIETY FOR ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 22 (01) : 85 - 97
  • [43] Source Apportionment of Atmospheric Bulk Deposition in the Belgrade Urban Area Using Positive Matrix Factorization
    Tasic, M.
    Mijic, Z.
    Rajsic, S.
    Stojic, A.
    Radenkovic, M.
    Joksic, J.
    [J]. SECOND INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON NON-EQUILIBRIUM PROCESSES IN PLASMAS AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2009, 162
  • [44] Source Apportionment of PM10 by Positive Matrix Factorization in Urban Area of Mumbai, India
    Gupta, Indrani
    Salunkhe, Abhaysinh
    Kumar, Rakesh
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC WORLD JOURNAL, 2012,
  • [45] Source apportionment of PM10 at a small industrial area using Positive Matrix Factorization
    Lim, Jong-Myoung
    Lee, Jin-Hong
    Moon, Jong-Hwa
    Chung, Yong-Sam
    Kim, Ki-Hyun
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 2010, 95 (01) : 88 - 100
  • [46] Compilation and assessment of recent positive matrix factorization and UNMIX receptor model studies on fine particulate matter source apportionment for the eastern United States
    Engel-Cox, Jill A.
    Weber, Stephanie A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2007, 57 (11): : 1307 - 1316
  • [47] Source apportionment of organic compounds in Berlin using positive matrix factorization - Assessing the impact of biogenic aerosol and biomass burning on urban particulate matter
    Wagener, Sandra
    Langner, Marcel
    Hansen, Ute
    Moriske, Heinz-Joern
    Endlicher, Wilfried R.
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 435 : 392 - 401
  • [48] Source apportionment of ambient particles: Comparison of positive matrix factorization analysis applied to particle size distribution and chemical composition data
    Gu, Jianwei
    Pitz, Mike
    Schnelle-Kreis, Juergen
    Diemer, Juergen
    Reller, Armin
    Zimmermann, Ralf
    Soentgen, Jens
    Stoelzel, Matthias
    Wichmann, H. -Erich
    Peters, Annette
    Cyrys, Josef
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 45 (10) : 1849 - 1857
  • [49] Sources of organic aerosol: Positive matrix factorization of molecular marker data and comparison of results from different source apportionment models
    Shrivastava, Manish K.
    Subramanian, R.
    Rogge, Wolfgang F.
    Robinson, Allen L.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 41 (40) : 9353 - 9369
  • [50] Source apportionment of ambient fine particle size distribution using positive matrix factorization in Erfurt, Germany
    Yue, Wei
    Stoelzel, Matthias
    Cyrys, Josef
    Pitz, Mike
    Heinrich, Joachim
    Kreyling, Wolfgang G.
    Wichmann, H. -Erich
    Peters, Annette
    Wang, Sheng
    Hopke, Philip K.
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2008, 398 (1-3) : 133 - 144