Comparison of Positive Matrix Factorization and Multilinear Engine for the source apportionment of particulate pollutants

被引:70
|
作者
Ramadan, Z
Eickhout, B
Song, XH
Buydens, LMC
Hopke, PK
机构
[1] Clarkson Univ, Dept Chem Engn, Potsdam, NY 13699 USA
[2] Univ Nijmegen, Analyt Chem Lab, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
Positive Matrix Factorization; Multilinear Engine; particulate pollutants;
D O I
10.1016/S0169-7439(02)00160-0
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
New approaches to solving the factor analysis (FA) problem have recently been developed by recognizing that factor analysis is fundamentally a least-squares (LS) problem. This approach is called Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF). Two programs have been written to implement different algorithms for solving the problem. These programs are PMF2 and Multilinear Engine (ME-2). The two programs use different algorithms to obtain the least-squares solution and the constraints are imposed in different ways. Elemental composition data for particle samples collected in Phoenix, AZ from June 1996 through June 1998, were used to compare the source apportionment of these two programs. The ME-2 results presented in this paper are compared with the previously published PMF2 results. The identification of the eight PMF sources returned one questionable source: wood burning and some peculiar mass contributions. The extra features of ME-2 made it possible to also investigate the sources responsible for the fine particles. The mixed-way approach indicated the existence of incinerators in the Phoenix area. Like PMF, ME-2 identified high source contributions for biomass burning, motor vehicles (with higher contribution in winter), coal-fired power plants (secondary particles with higher contributions in summer), soil, and nonferrous smelting process. Sea salt and heavy-duty diesel were identified by the ME two-way analysis, but they disappeared in the three-way analysis of the dual fine particle sequential sampler (DFPSS) and DICHOT data. Instead, an obvious incinerator source was identified again. Thus, PMF and ME-2 identified the same major sources responsible for the PM2.5 in Phoenix, but some of the sources identified by PMF2 appear to be uncertain. The three-way analysis provided additional information about possible sources, but also returned unexplainable sources. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 28
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effect of Uncertainty on Source Contributions from the Positive Matrix Factorization Model for a Source Apportionment Study
    Shi, Guo-Liang
    Chen, Hao
    Tian, Ying-Ze
    Song, Dan-Lin
    Zhou, Lai-Dong
    Chen, Fei
    Yu, Hao-Fei
    Feng, Yin-Chang
    [J]. AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2016, 16 (07) : 1665 - 1674
  • [22] Source apportionment of fine particulate matter in Macao, China with and without organic tracers: A comparative study using positive matrix factorization
    Wang, Qiongqiong
    Huang, X. H. Hilda
    Tam, Frankie C. V.
    Zhang, Xiaxia
    Liu, Kin Man
    Yeung, Claisen
    Feng, Yongming
    Cheng, Yuk Ying
    Wong, Yee Ka
    Ng, Wai Man
    Wu, Cheng
    Zhang, Qingyan
    Zhang, Ting
    Lau, Ngai Ting
    Yuan, Zibing
    Lau, Alexis K. H.
    Yu, Jian Zhen
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 198 : 183 - 193
  • [23] Fine particulate matter source apportionment for the Chemical Speciation Trends Network site at Birmingham, Alabama, using Positive Matrix Factorization
    Baumann, Karsten
    Jayanty, R. K. M.
    Flanagan, James B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2008, 58 (01) : 27 - 44
  • [24] Source Apportionment of Particulate Matter in Urban Snowpack Using End-Member Mixing Analysis and Positive Matrix Factorization Model
    Semenov, Mikhail Y.
    Onishchuk, Natalya A.
    Netsvetaeva, Olga G.
    Khodzher, Tamara V.
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (24)
  • [25] SOURCE APPORTIONMENT OF PARTICULATE AIR-POLLUTANTS IN JAPAN
    TAKAHASHI, K
    KASAHARA, M
    CHOI, KC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AEROSOL SCIENCE, 1988, 19 (03) : 381 - 384
  • [26] Source apportionment of exposure to toxic volatile organic compounds using positive matrix factorization
    Anderson, MJ
    Miller, SL
    Milford, JB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPOSURE ANALYSIS AND ENVIRONMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 11 (04): : 295 - 307
  • [27] PM10 Source Apportionment in Ahvaz, Iran, Using Positive Matrix Factorization
    Sowlat, Mohammad Hossein
    Naddafi, Kazem
    Yunesian, Masud
    Jackson, Peter L.
    Lotfi, Saeedeh
    Shahsavani, Abbas
    [J]. CLEAN-SOIL AIR WATER, 2013, 41 (12) : 1143 - 1151
  • [28] Source apportionment of exposure to toxic volatile organic compounds using positive matrix factorization
    MELISSA J ANDERSON
    SHELLY L MILLER
    JANA B MILFORD
    [J]. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, 2001, 11 : 295 - 307
  • [29] Source apportionment of airborne nanoparticles in a Middle Eastern city using positive matrix factorization
    Al-Dabbous, Abdullah N.
    Kumar, Prashant
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-PROCESSES & IMPACTS, 2015, 17 (04) : 802 - 812
  • [30] Source apportionment of pollution in groundwater source area using factor analysis and positive matrix factorization methods
    Guo, Xueru
    Zuo, Rui
    Shan, Dan
    Cao, Yang
    Wang, Jinsheng
    Teng, Yanguo
    Fu, Qing
    Zheng, Binghui
    [J]. HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 2017, 23 (06): : 1417 - 1436