Comparison of Positive Matrix Factorization and Multilinear Engine for the source apportionment of particulate pollutants

被引:70
|
作者
Ramadan, Z
Eickhout, B
Song, XH
Buydens, LMC
Hopke, PK
机构
[1] Clarkson Univ, Dept Chem Engn, Potsdam, NY 13699 USA
[2] Univ Nijmegen, Analyt Chem Lab, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
Positive Matrix Factorization; Multilinear Engine; particulate pollutants;
D O I
10.1016/S0169-7439(02)00160-0
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
New approaches to solving the factor analysis (FA) problem have recently been developed by recognizing that factor analysis is fundamentally a least-squares (LS) problem. This approach is called Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF). Two programs have been written to implement different algorithms for solving the problem. These programs are PMF2 and Multilinear Engine (ME-2). The two programs use different algorithms to obtain the least-squares solution and the constraints are imposed in different ways. Elemental composition data for particle samples collected in Phoenix, AZ from June 1996 through June 1998, were used to compare the source apportionment of these two programs. The ME-2 results presented in this paper are compared with the previously published PMF2 results. The identification of the eight PMF sources returned one questionable source: wood burning and some peculiar mass contributions. The extra features of ME-2 made it possible to also investigate the sources responsible for the fine particles. The mixed-way approach indicated the existence of incinerators in the Phoenix area. Like PMF, ME-2 identified high source contributions for biomass burning, motor vehicles (with higher contribution in winter), coal-fired power plants (secondary particles with higher contributions in summer), soil, and nonferrous smelting process. Sea salt and heavy-duty diesel were identified by the ME two-way analysis, but they disappeared in the three-way analysis of the dual fine particle sequential sampler (DFPSS) and DICHOT data. Instead, an obvious incinerator source was identified again. Thus, PMF and ME-2 identified the same major sources responsible for the PM2.5 in Phoenix, but some of the sources identified by PMF2 appear to be uncertain. The three-way analysis provided additional information about possible sources, but also returned unexplainable sources. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 28
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Application of positive matrix factorization in source apportionment of particulate pollutants in Hong Kong
    Lee, E
    Chan, CK
    Paatero, P
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1999, 33 (19) : 3201 - 3212
  • [2] Positive matrix factorization on source apportionment for typical pollutants in different environmental media: a review
    Sun, Xiang
    Wang, Haoqi
    Guo, Zhigang
    Lu, Peili
    Song, Fuzhong
    Liu, Li
    Liu, Jiaxin
    Rose, Neil L.
    Wang, Fengwen
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-PROCESSES & IMPACTS, 2020, 22 (02) : 239 - 255
  • [3] Source apportionment of particulate organic compounds in a rural area of Spain by positive matrix factorization
    Pindado, Oscar
    Perez, Rosa M.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2011, 2 (04) : 492 - 505
  • [4] Source apportionment of fine particulate matter in Phoenix, AZ, using positive matrix factorization
    Brown, Steven G.
    Frankel, Anna
    Raffuse, Sean M.
    Roberts, Paul T.
    Hafner, Hilary R.
    Anderson, Darcy J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2007, 57 (06) : 741 - 752
  • [5] Source identification and apportionment of fine particulate matter in Houston, TX, using positive matrix factorization
    Buzcu, B
    Fraser, MP
    Kulkarni, P
    Chellam, S
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2003, 20 (06) : 533 - 545
  • [6] Source apportionment of fine particulate matter by positive matrix factorization in the metropolitan area of Sao Paulo, Brazil
    de Miranda, Regina Maura
    Andrade, Maria de Fatima
    Dutra Ribeiro, Flavia Noronha
    Mendonca Francisco, Kelliton Jose
    Perez-Martinez, Pedro Jose
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 202 : 253 - 263
  • [7] Source apportionment with uncertainty estimates of fine particulate matter in Ostrava, Czech Republic using Positive Matrix Factorization
    Vossler, Teri
    Cernikovsky, Libor
    Novak, Jiri
    Williams, Ronald
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2016, 7 (03) : 503 - 512
  • [8] Source Apportionment of Personal Exposure to Fine Particulate Matter and Volatile Organic Compounds using Positive Matrix Factorization
    Pekey, Hakan
    Pekey, Beyhan
    Arslanbas, Demet
    Bozkurt, Zehra Bulut
    Dogan, Guray
    Tuncel, Gurdal
    [J]. WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2013, 224 (01):
  • [9] Source Apportionment of Personal Exposure to Fine Particulate Matter and Volatile Organic Compounds using Positive Matrix Factorization
    Hakan Pekey
    Beyhan Pekey
    Demet Arslanbaş
    Zehra Bulut Bozkurt
    Güray Doğan
    Gürdal Tuncel
    [J]. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 2013, 224
  • [10] Source Apportionment of Groundwater Pollution using Unmix and Positive Matrix Factorization
    Mohammad Shahid Gulgundi
    Amba Shetty
    [J]. Environmental Processes, 2019, 6 : 457 - 473