Granger Causality: A Review and Recent Advances

被引:84
|
作者
Shojaie, Ali [1 ]
Fox, Emily B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Biostat, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Stat, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
multivariate time series; vector autoregressive model; graphical models; penalized estimation; deep neural networks; mixed-frequency time series; DIRECTED INFORMATION; VECTOR AUTOREGRESSIONS; TEMPORAL AGGREGATION; REGULATORY NETWORKS; MODEL; NUMBER; IDENTIFICATION; REGRESSION; SELECTION; FEEDBACK;
D O I
10.1146/annurev-statistics-040120-010930
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Introduced more than a half-century ago, Granger causality has become a popular tool for analyzing time series data in many application domains, from economics and finance to genomics and neuroscience. Despite this popularity, the validity of this framework for inferring causal relationships among time series has remained the topic of continuous debate. Moreover, while the original definition was general, limitations in computational tools have constrained the applications of Granger causality to primarily simple bivariate vector autoregressive processes. Starting with a review of early developments and debates, this article discusses recent advances that address various shortcomings of the earlier approaches, from models for high-dimensional time series to more recent developments that account for nonlinear and non-Gaussian observations and allow for subsampled and mixed-frequency time series.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 319
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Nonlinear connectivity by Granger causality
    Marinazzo, Daniele
    Liao, Wei
    Chen, Huafu
    Stramaglia, Sebastiano
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2011, 58 (02) : 330 - 338
  • [32] Granger causality for circular variables
    Angelini, Leonardo
    Pellicoro, Mario
    Stramaglia, Sebastiano
    [J]. PHYSICS LETTERS A, 2009, 373 (29) : 2467 - 2470
  • [33] A Copula Nonlinear Granger Causality
    Kim, Jong-Min
    Lee, Namgil
    Hwang, Sun Young
    [J]. ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2020, 88 : 420 - 430
  • [34] GRANGER CAUSALITY AND EXPECTATIONAL RATIONALITY
    NOBLE, NR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MONEY CREDIT AND BANKING, 1982, 14 (04) : 532 - 537
  • [35] Granger Causality for Heterogeneous Processes
    Behzadi, Sahar
    Hlavackova-Schindler, Katerina
    Plant, Claudia
    [J]. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, PAKDD 2019, PT III, 2019, 11441 : 463 - 475
  • [36] More discussions for granger causality and new causality measures
    Sanqing Hu
    Yu Cao
    Jianhai Zhang
    Wanzeng Kong
    Kun Yang
    Yanbin Zhang
    Xun Li
    [J]. Cognitive Neurodynamics, 2012, 6 : 33 - 42
  • [37] More discussions for granger causality and new causality measures
    Hu, Sanqing
    Cao, Yu
    Zhang, Jianhai
    Kong, Wanzeng
    Yang, Kun
    Zhang, Yanbin
    Li, Xun
    [J]. COGNITIVE NEURODYNAMICS, 2012, 6 (01) : 33 - 42
  • [38] Testing for Granger causality in variance in the presence of causality in mean
    Pantelidis, T
    Pittis, N
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2004, 85 (02) : 201 - 207
  • [39] A contribution to attribution of recent global warming by out-of-sample Granger causality analysis
    Attanasio, Alessandro
    Pasini, Antonello
    Triacca, Umberto
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCE LETTERS, 2012, 13 (01): : 67 - 72
  • [40] The effect of filtering on Granger causality based multivariate causality measures
    Florin, Esther
    Gross, Joachim
    Pfeifer, Johannes
    Fink, Gereon R.
    Timmermann, Lars
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2010, 50 (02) : 577 - 588