Computer literacy and inquiry learning: when geeks learn less

被引:35
|
作者
Wecker, C.
Kohnlet, C.
Fischer, F.
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Dept Psychol, D-80802 Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Tubingen, D-72074 Tubingen, Germany
关键词
collaborative learning; computer literacy; digital divide; web-based inquiry learning; knowledge gap hypothesis; patterns of media use;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00218.x
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
A low level of computer literacy has often been hypothesized as constituting a disadvantage in knowledge acquisition. However, within the field of computer-supported inquiry learning systematic investigations of these purported relations have not been conducted. This classroom study investigates the role of computer literacy (procedural computer-related knowledge, self-confidence in using the computer, and familiarity with computers) as a learning prerequisite for knowledge acquisition, and analyses the learners' patterns of media use as processes that might explain this role. Thirty-seven students from two final classes of a secondary school worked in pairs on the project 'How far does light go?' in the Web-based Inquiry Science Environment. Findings did indicate significant relations of neither procedural computer-related knowledge nor self-confidence in using the computer to knowledge acquisition. However, students with greater familiarity with computers acquired significantly less knowledge. In the light of the patterns of media use, these findings might be explained by different navigation styles adopted by students with high and low familiarity with computers: students with high familiarity with computers exhibit more shallow processing strategies ('browsing') which are less functional for learning.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 144
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An inquiry into inquiry: Learning to become a literacy researcher
    Johnson, Lindy L.
    [J]. ENGLISH TEACHING-PRACTICE AND CRITIQUE, 2012, 11 (02): : 81 - 93
  • [2] Inquiry, literacy, and learning in the middle grades
    Steadman, Sharilyn C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT & ADULT LITERACY, 2006, 50 (03) : 246 - 248
  • [3] KWLQ: Inquiry and literacy learning in science
    Schmidt, PR
    [J]. READING TEACHER, 1999, 52 (07): : 789 - 792
  • [4] WHAT RESIDENTS WANT TO LEARN IN A COMPUTER LITERACY CURRICULUM
    ROBIE, PW
    KENDRICK, SB
    RICHARDS, BF
    [J]. CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1989, 37 (01): : A86 - A86
  • [5] WHAT RESIDENTS WANT TO LEARN IN A COMPUTER LITERACY CURRICULUM
    ROBIE, PW
    KENDRICK, SB
    RICHARDS, BF
    [J]. CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1989, 37 (02): : A814 - A814
  • [6] Literacy learning and scientific inquiry: Children respond
    Schmidt, PR
    Gillen, S
    Zollo, TC
    Stone, R
    [J]. READING TEACHER, 2002, 55 (06): : 534 - 548
  • [7] Information literacy for inquiry-based learning
    Goncalves Dias Gasque, Kelley Cristine
    [J]. TRANSINFORMACAO, 2016, 28 (03): : 253 - 262
  • [8] Linking librarians, inquiry learning, and information literacy?
    Lance, Keith Curry
    Maniotes, Leslie K.
    [J]. PHI DELTA KAPPAN, 2020, 101 (07) : 47 - 51
  • [9] Learn to read and write: app for the literacy learning
    Gomez-Diaz, Raquel
    Garcia-Rodriguez, Araceli
    Antonio Cordon-Garcia, Jose
    [J]. EDUCATION IN THE KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY, 2015, 16 (04): : 118 - 137
  • [10] Predicting to Perceive and Learning When to Learn
    Corlett, Philip
    [J]. TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2020, 24 (04) : 259 - 260