Effect of grazing exclusion on ecosystem services dynamics, trade-offs and synergies in Northern Tibet

被引:14
|
作者
Liu, Yixuan [1 ]
Liu, Shiliang [1 ]
Sun, Yongxiu [1 ]
Sun, Jian [2 ]
Wang, Fangfang [1 ]
Li, Mingqi [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Environm, 19 Xinjiekouwai St, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Key Lab Ecosyst Network Observat & Modelling, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
关键词
Grazing intensity; Grassland management; Relationship; Driving factors; Geographically weighted regression; ALPINE GRASSLAND; DRIVING FORCES; CONSERVATION; RESTORATION; DEGRADATION; PATTERNS; PLATEAU; REGION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoleng.2022.106638
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The relationships between different ecosystem services are key to regional ecological stability and security, and their trade-offs and synergies are affected by many factors, especially on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (QTP), which is susceptible to human activities. Norther Tibet, located on the QTP, has built fences for grazing exclusion in recent years. However, how grazing exclusion affect the ecosystem service variability and their mechanism remains still unclear. Based on the net primary productivity (NPP) quantitative index method, hotspot analysis, geographically weighted regression (GWR) model, this study analyzed the effects of grazing exclusion with fencing on ecosystem services dynamics, trade-offs and synergies. Results showed that the values of biodiversity conservation, water conservation and soil conservation were all higher in the fencing region than in the nonfencing region. Most counties experienced increasing trends in the fencing region with higher biodiversity conservation, water conservation in the fencing region than that in the non-fencing region from 2006 to 2015. Except for the relationship between soil conservation and water conservation in the non-fencing region in Cuoqin county in 2015, the relationships among all ecosystem services were synergistic, and the overall trends were weakening. The county number percentage with higher synergistic relationships in the fencing region than that in the non-fencing region showed gradually increasing trends. Land use intensity, grazing intensity, precipitation and altitude were the main factors that affecting spatial heterogeneity of three ecosystem services in the nonfencing region, while distance to road, distance to town, land use intensity and temperature were the main influencing factors in the fencing region. This study contributes to exploring the effect of grazing exclusion on ecosystem services and their relationships, thus providing guidance for the formulation of grassland restoration measures
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Assessing synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services in forest landscape management
    Jafarzadeh, Ali Akbar
    Mahdavi, Ali
    Shamsi, Seyed Rashid Fallah
    Yousefpour, Rasoul
    LAND USE POLICY, 2021, 111
  • [32] Synergies and trade-offs in the management of lowland rural floodplains: an ecosystem services approach
    Rouquette, J. R.
    Posthumus, H.
    Morris, J.
    Hess, T. M.
    Dawson, Q. L.
    Gowing, D. J. G.
    HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 2011, 56 (08): : 1566 - 1581
  • [33] Providing ecosystem services in a challenging environment by dealing with bundles, trade-offs, and synergies
    Gonzalez-Ollauri, Alejandro
    Mickovski, Slobodan B.
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2017, 28 : 261 - 263
  • [34] Biochar induced trade-offs and synergies between ecosystem services and crop productivity
    Wang, Jinxia
    Huang, Qiu
    Peng, Kai
    Yang, Dayang
    Wei, Guozhen
    Ren, Yunfei
    Wang, Yixuan
    Wang, Xiukang
    Vinay, Nangia
    Sun, Shikun
    Yang, Yanming
    Mo, Fei
    JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE AGRICULTURE, 2024, 23 (11) : 3882 - 3895
  • [35] Global analysis of reef ecosystem services reveals synergies, trade-offs and bundles
    Pellowe, Kara E.
    Meacham, Megan
    Peterson, Garry D.
    Lade, Steven J.
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2023, 63
  • [36] A farming systems approach to assess synergies and trade-offs among ecosystem services
    Silva, J. F.
    Santos, J. L.
    Ribeiro, P. F.
    Marta-Pedroso, C.
    Magalhaes, M. R.
    Moreira, F.
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2024, 65
  • [37] Biochar induced trade-offs and synergies between ecosystem services and crop productivity
    Jinxia Wang
    Qiu Huang
    Kai Peng
    Dayang Yang
    Guozhen Wei
    Yunfei Ren
    Yixuan Wang
    Xiukang Wang
    Nangia Vinay
    Shikun Sun
    Yanming Yang
    Fei Mo
    Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23 (11) : 3882 - 3895
  • [38] Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services in an alpine ecosystem grazed by sheep - An experimental approach
    Austrheim, Gunnar
    Speed, James D. M.
    Evju, Marianne
    Hester, Alison
    Holand, Oystein
    Loe, Leif Egil
    Martinsen, Vegard
    Mobaek, Ragnhild
    Mulder, Jan
    Steen, Harald
    Thompson, Des B. A.
    Mysterud, Atle
    BASIC AND APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2016, 17 (07) : 596 - 608
  • [39] Ecosystem services and trade-offs: implications for land dynamics and sustainable livelihoods in Northern Lombok, Indonesia
    Li, Puyang
    Agusdinata, Datu Buyung
    Suditha, Putu Hery
    Zhang, Yujia
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 23 (03) : 4321 - 4341
  • [40] Ecosystem services and trade-offs: implications for land dynamics and sustainable livelihoods in Northern Lombok, Indonesia
    Puyang Li
    Datu Buyung Agusdinata
    Putu Hery Suditha
    Yujia Zhang
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2021, 23 : 4321 - 4341