Effect of grazing exclusion on ecosystem services dynamics, trade-offs and synergies in Northern Tibet

被引:14
|
作者
Liu, Yixuan [1 ]
Liu, Shiliang [1 ]
Sun, Yongxiu [1 ]
Sun, Jian [2 ]
Wang, Fangfang [1 ]
Li, Mingqi [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Environm, 19 Xinjiekouwai St, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Key Lab Ecosyst Network Observat & Modelling, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
关键词
Grazing intensity; Grassland management; Relationship; Driving factors; Geographically weighted regression; ALPINE GRASSLAND; DRIVING FORCES; CONSERVATION; RESTORATION; DEGRADATION; PATTERNS; PLATEAU; REGION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoleng.2022.106638
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The relationships between different ecosystem services are key to regional ecological stability and security, and their trade-offs and synergies are affected by many factors, especially on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (QTP), which is susceptible to human activities. Norther Tibet, located on the QTP, has built fences for grazing exclusion in recent years. However, how grazing exclusion affect the ecosystem service variability and their mechanism remains still unclear. Based on the net primary productivity (NPP) quantitative index method, hotspot analysis, geographically weighted regression (GWR) model, this study analyzed the effects of grazing exclusion with fencing on ecosystem services dynamics, trade-offs and synergies. Results showed that the values of biodiversity conservation, water conservation and soil conservation were all higher in the fencing region than in the nonfencing region. Most counties experienced increasing trends in the fencing region with higher biodiversity conservation, water conservation in the fencing region than that in the non-fencing region from 2006 to 2015. Except for the relationship between soil conservation and water conservation in the non-fencing region in Cuoqin county in 2015, the relationships among all ecosystem services were synergistic, and the overall trends were weakening. The county number percentage with higher synergistic relationships in the fencing region than that in the non-fencing region showed gradually increasing trends. Land use intensity, grazing intensity, precipitation and altitude were the main factors that affecting spatial heterogeneity of three ecosystem services in the nonfencing region, while distance to road, distance to town, land use intensity and temperature were the main influencing factors in the fencing region. This study contributes to exploring the effect of grazing exclusion on ecosystem services and their relationships, thus providing guidance for the formulation of grassland restoration measures
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Global synergies and trade-offs between multiple dimensions of biodiversity and ecosystem services
    Marco Girardello
    Andrea Santangeli
    Emiliano Mori
    Anna Chapman
    Simone Fattorini
    Robin Naidoo
    Sandro Bertolino
    Jens-Christian Svenning
    Scientific Reports, 9
  • [22] Trade-Offs and Synergies between Ecosystem Services Provided by Different Rural Landscape
    Bartolini, Fabio
    Vergamini, Daniele
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2023, 13 (04):
  • [23] Spatial Trade-Offs and Synergies between Ecosystem Services in Guangdong Province, China
    Xu, Qian
    Yang, Ying
    Yang, Ren
    Zha, Li-Si
    Lin, Zi-Qing
    Shang, Shu-Hao
    LAND, 2024, 13 (01)
  • [24] Cultural ecosystem services in an urban park: understanding bundles, trade-offs, and synergies
    Xin Cheng
    Sylvie Van Damme
    Luyuan Li
    Pieter Uyttenhove
    Landscape Ecology, 2022, 37 : 1693 - 1705
  • [25] Global synergies and trade-offs between multiple dimensions of biodiversity and ecosystem services
    Girardello, Marco
    Santangeli, Andrea
    Mori, Emiliano
    Chapman, Anna
    Fattorini, Simone
    Naidoo, Robin
    Bertolino, Sandro
    Svenning, Jens-Christian
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [26] Cultural Ecosystem Services in Protected Areas: Understanding Bundles, Trade-Offs, and Synergies
    Ament, Judith M.
    Moore, Christine A.
    Herbst, Marna
    Cumming, Graeme S.
    CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2017, 10 (04): : 440 - 450
  • [27] Cultural ecosystem services in an urban park: understanding bundles, trade-offs, and synergies
    Cheng, Xin
    Van Damme, Sylvie
    Li, Luyuan
    Uyttenhove, Pieter
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2022, 37 (06) : 1693 - 1705
  • [28] Regulating ecosystem services in a local forest: Navigating supply, trade-offs, and synergies
    Jo, Jang-Hwan
    Choi, Moongi
    Kweon, Deogkyu
    Son, Young-Gyun
    Lim, Emily Marie
    TREES FORESTS AND PEOPLE, 2024, 15
  • [29] Trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services in karst multi-mountainous cities
    Li, Qin
    Bao, Yu
    Wang, Zhitai
    Chen, Xintong
    Lin, Xun
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2024, 159
  • [30] Trade-Offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in the Pearl River Delta Urban Agglomeration
    Zhang, Qiongrui
    Sun, Xuechao
    Zhang, Kebin
    Liao, Zhenni
    Xu, Songjun
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (16)