Effect of grazing exclusion on ecosystem services dynamics, trade-offs and synergies in Northern Tibet

被引:14
|
作者
Liu, Yixuan [1 ]
Liu, Shiliang [1 ]
Sun, Yongxiu [1 ]
Sun, Jian [2 ]
Wang, Fangfang [1 ]
Li, Mingqi [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Environm, 19 Xinjiekouwai St, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Key Lab Ecosyst Network Observat & Modelling, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
关键词
Grazing intensity; Grassland management; Relationship; Driving factors; Geographically weighted regression; ALPINE GRASSLAND; DRIVING FORCES; CONSERVATION; RESTORATION; DEGRADATION; PATTERNS; PLATEAU; REGION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoleng.2022.106638
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The relationships between different ecosystem services are key to regional ecological stability and security, and their trade-offs and synergies are affected by many factors, especially on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (QTP), which is susceptible to human activities. Norther Tibet, located on the QTP, has built fences for grazing exclusion in recent years. However, how grazing exclusion affect the ecosystem service variability and their mechanism remains still unclear. Based on the net primary productivity (NPP) quantitative index method, hotspot analysis, geographically weighted regression (GWR) model, this study analyzed the effects of grazing exclusion with fencing on ecosystem services dynamics, trade-offs and synergies. Results showed that the values of biodiversity conservation, water conservation and soil conservation were all higher in the fencing region than in the nonfencing region. Most counties experienced increasing trends in the fencing region with higher biodiversity conservation, water conservation in the fencing region than that in the non-fencing region from 2006 to 2015. Except for the relationship between soil conservation and water conservation in the non-fencing region in Cuoqin county in 2015, the relationships among all ecosystem services were synergistic, and the overall trends were weakening. The county number percentage with higher synergistic relationships in the fencing region than that in the non-fencing region showed gradually increasing trends. Land use intensity, grazing intensity, precipitation and altitude were the main factors that affecting spatial heterogeneity of three ecosystem services in the nonfencing region, while distance to road, distance to town, land use intensity and temperature were the main influencing factors in the fencing region. This study contributes to exploring the effect of grazing exclusion on ecosystem services and their relationships, thus providing guidance for the formulation of grassland restoration measures
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Exploring the complex trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services in the Tibet autonomous region
    Huang, Jiuming
    Zheng, Fangyu
    Dong, Xiaobin
    Wang, Xue-Chao
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 384
  • [2] Trade-Offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in Southwestern China
    Ran, Chen
    Wang, Shijie
    Bai, Xiaoyong
    Tan, Qiu
    Zhao, Cuiwei
    Luo, Xuling
    Chen, Huan
    Xi, Huipeng
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2020, 37 (10) : 669 - 678
  • [3] Spatial dynamics of biophysical trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services in the Himalayas
    Aryal, Kishor
    Maraseni, Tek
    Apan, Armando
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2023, 59
  • [4] Trade-offs and synergies between ecosystem services on the Tibetan Plateau
    Yuan, Zhengrong
    Liang, Yuling
    Zhao, Hui
    Wei, Da
    Wang, Xiaodan
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2024, 158
  • [5] Ecosystem services trade-offs and synergies in China, 2000–2015
    W. Chen
    G. Chi
    International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2023, 20 : 3221 - 3236
  • [6] Trade-offs and synergies in ecosystem services for the Yinchuan Basin in China
    Li, Boyan
    Wang, Wei
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2018, 84 : 837 - 846
  • [7] Exploring the complex trade-offs and synergies of global ecosystem services
    Wang, Jinnan
    Wu, Wenjun
    Yang, Meng
    Gao, Yueming
    Shao, Jiacheng
    Yang, Weishan
    Ma, Guoxia
    Yu, Fang
    Yao, Nan
    Jiang, Hongqiang
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND ECOTECHNOLOGY, 2024, 21
  • [8] Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services in Costa Rica
    Locatelli, Bruno
    Imbach, Pablo
    Wunder, Sven
    ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 2014, 41 (01) : 27 - 36
  • [9] Precipitation dominants synergies and trade-offs among ecosystem services across the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau
    Chen, Junhe
    Wang, Yafeng
    Sun, Jian
    Liang, Eryuan
    Shen, Miaogen
    Yang, Bin
    Jia, Xiaohua
    Zhang, Jianxiang
    GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2021, 32
  • [10] Bundling ecosystem services in Denmark: Trade-offs and synergies in a cultural landscape
    Turner, Katrine Grace
    Odgaard, Mette Vestergaard
    Bocher, Peder K.
    Dalgaard, Tommy
    Svenning, Jens-Christian
    LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2014, 125 : 89 - 104