MR imaging-guided biliary drainage in an open low-field system: First clinical experiences

被引:13
|
作者
Wacker, FK
Faiss, S
Reither, K
Zimmer, T
Wendt, M
Wolf, KJ
机构
[1] Free Univ Berlin, Klinikum Benjamin Franklin, Dept Radiol, D-12200 Berlin, Germany
[2] Free Univ Berlin, Klinikum Benjamin Franklin, Dept Internal Med Gastroenterol, D-12200 Berlin, Germany
[3] Case Western Reserve Univ, Hosp Cleveland, Dept Radiol, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[4] Siemens Med Syst Inc, Iselin, NJ 08830 USA
关键词
MR imaging-guided procedures; interventional MRI; MR cholangiography; biliary drainage; susceptibility artifacts;
D O I
10.1055/s-2000-7223
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To test the feasibility of MR imaging (MRI)-guided percutaneous biliary drainages in patients using an open MR-system. Methods: 6 patients with mechanical cholestasis underwent MRI-guided puncture and catheterization of the biliary system following intervention planning with magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) in an open low-field MR system. Data on the number of punctures required, success in establishing external and internal drainage, and total procedure time were compared to those of 6 patients who underwent biliary drainage with fluoroscopic guidance. Results: MRC facilitated intervention planning in all patients. Near-real-time MR imaging enabled interactive positioning of the devices. The bile ducts were punctured under MRI control in three patients in the first, in two in the second, and in one in the third attempt. MRI-guided puncture was faster than the fluoroscopic procedure. Catheterization for external drainage was successful in all patients. Passing the obstructions was not possible under MRI guidance. The procedure time for MRI-guided catheterization was longer than in the conventional technique. Conclusion: MRI-guidance allows reliable placement of an external biliary drainage in an open low-field MR system.
引用
收藏
页码:744 / 747
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Staging uterine cervical carcinoma with low-field MR imaging
    Hansen, MA
    Pedersen, PH
    Andreasson, B
    Bjerregaard, B
    Thomsen, HS
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2000, 41 (06) : 647 - 652
  • [32] INTRAOPERATIVE NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL MONITORING IN AN OPEN LOW-FIELD MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING SYSTEM: CLINICAL EXPERIENCE AND TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS
    Szelenyi, Andrea
    Gasser, Thomas
    Seifert, Volker
    NEUROSURGERY, 2008, 63 (04) : 268 - 275
  • [33] MR-guided transgluteal biopsies with an open low-field system in patients with clinically suspected prostate cancer: technique and preliminary results
    Zangos, S
    Eichler, K
    Engelmann, K
    Ahmed, M
    Dettmer, S
    Herzog, C
    Pegios, W
    Wetter, A
    Lehnert, T
    Mack, MG
    Vogl, TJ
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2005, 15 (01) : 174 - 182
  • [34] MR-guided transgluteal biopsies with an open low-field system in patients with clinically suspected prostate cancer: technique and preliminary results
    Stephan Zangos
    Katrin Eichler
    Kerstin Engelmann
    Mukhtiar Ahmed
    Sebastian Dettmer
    Christopher Herzog
    Wasilios Pegios
    A. Wetter
    Thomas Lehnert
    Martin G. Mack
    Thomas J. Vogl
    European Radiology, 2005, 15 : 174 - 182
  • [35] MR IMAGING OF HAND AND WRIST WITH A DEDICATED 0.1-T LOW-FIELD IMAGING-SYSTEM
    GRIES, P
    CONSTANTINESCO, A
    BRUNOT, B
    FACELLO, A
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1991, 9 (06) : 949 - 953
  • [36] Imaging diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodules on an open low-field MRI system -: comparison of two MR sequences with spiral CT
    Schäfer, JF
    Vollmar, J
    Schick, F
    Seemann, MD
    Mehnert, F
    Vonthein, R
    Aebert, H
    Claussen, CD
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2002, 174 (09): : 1107 - 1114
  • [37] Open whole body low-field MR imaging: Are we there yet? Results of a prospective multicentre study with 401 patients comparing low-field and high-field MRI imaging to goldstandard
    Meri, T
    Scholz, M
    Langer, M
    Weiss, HD
    Wolf, KJ
    RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213P : 297 - 297
  • [38] COMPARISON OF LOW-FIELD VERSUS HIGH-FIELD MR-IMAGING
    DESPLANTES, BGZ
    KOSTER, K
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1995, 20 (02) : 156 - 157
  • [39] Validation of An Automatic ACR Phantom Quality Assurance Tool for the Low-Field MR Guided Radiotherapy System
    Gao, Y.
    Lotey, R.
    Hu, P.
    Yang, Y.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : E670 - E670
  • [40] Setting up MR compatibility of a commercial stereo-localization system for low-field open MR interventional procedures
    Romain Viard
    Maximilien Vermandel
    Jean Rousseau
    International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 2009, 4 : 65 - 69