The influence of injection rate on the hypnotic effect of propofol during anesthesia: A randomized trial

被引:10
|
作者
Blum, Jasmin [1 ]
Kochs, Eberhard [1 ]
Forster, Nicole [1 ]
Schneider, Gerhard [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Dept Anesthesiol, D-8000 Munich, Germany
来源
PLOS CLINICAL TRIALS | 2006年 / 1卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1371/journal.pctr.0010017
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objective: Previous studies suggested that slow injection of propofol may increase the hypnotic effect during induction of anesthesia. The aim of the present study was therefore to investigate whether injection rate of propofol has an influence on its maximum effect. Design: Randomized, single-blind trial. Setting: This study has been carried out in the operating rooms of a university hospital. An anesthesiologist and a resident performed the study with the aid of changing nursing staff. Participants: We investigated 99 unpremedicated patients aged 18 to 60 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 1-3. Interventions: Anesthesia was induced by intravenous injection of propofol (2 mg/kg). Propofol was manually injected in group 1 over a period of 5 s; in group 2 (120-s injection interval), and in group 3 (240-s injection interval), propofol was administered by an injection pump. After loss of consciousness, mask ventilation was performed with 100% oxygen. Bispectral index (BIS) was used to measure the hypnotic effect of propofol. After the decrease of BIS to the minimum value (i.e., maximum hypnotic effect) and the following increase of BIS to 60, the study period was finished and anesthesia was performed according to clinical criteria. Outcome Measures: We analyzed whether injection speed has an influence on the maximum hypnotic effect of a given dose of propofol (2 mg/kg). Results: BISmin marks the maximum electroencephalogram (EEG) effect of the propofol bolus as measured by the BIS. The lowest mean BISmin was measured in group 1 (28.7 +/- 10.3). In group 2, BISmin was 33.0 (+/- 13.9), and in group 3, BISmin was 36.4 (+/- 11.0). There were no significant differences between group 2 and groups 1 or 3, but there were significant differences between groups 1 and 3. In group 1, BISmin was reached after 102.91 s (+/- 44.20), in group 2 after 172.33 s (+/- 29.76), and in group 3 after 274.21 s (+/- 45.40). These differences were statistically significant for all comparisons. In summary, the lowest value for BISmin was achieved in the group with the fastest rate of propofol injection (group1, 5 s). The highest BISmin was obtained in the group with the slowest rate of injection (group 3, 240 s). The hemodynamic parameters were not significantly different among groups. Conclusions: The hypnotic peak effect of propofol is lower with extremely slow injection (240 s versus 5 s). For clinically usual injection rates (5 s and 120 s), there was no significant difference in propofol peak effect.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Analysis of heart rate variability dynamics during propofol anesthesia
    Tarvainen, M. P.
    Georgiadis, S.
    Lipponen, J. A.
    Laitio, T.
    Kaskinoro, K.
    Scheinin, H.
    Karjalainen, P. A.
    WORLD CONGRESS ON MEDICAL PHYSICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, VOL 25, PT 4: IMAGE PROCESSING, BIOSIGNAL PROCESSING, MODELLING AND SIMULATION, BIOMECHANICS, 2010, 25 : 868 - 871
  • [42] The effect of spinal anesthesia on the success rate of external cephalic version: A randomized trial
    Dugoff, L
    Stamm, CA
    Jones, OW
    Mohling, SI
    Hawkins, JL
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 93 (03): : 345 - 349
  • [43] Comparison of propofol versus propofol-ketamine combination for sedation during spinal anesthesia in children: randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety
    Singh, Rabinder
    Batra, Yatindra K.
    Bharti, Neerja
    Panda, Nidhi B.
    PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2010, 20 (05) : 439 - 444
  • [44] Effect of pre-administered flurbiprofen axetil on the EC50 of propofol during anesthesia in unstimulated patients: a randomized clinical trial
    Ma, Jing
    Peng, Mian
    Wang, Fei
    Chen, Lei
    Zhang, Zong-Ze
    Wang, Yan-Lin
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA, 2020, 70 (06): : 605 - 612
  • [45] The Effect of Relaxation Therapy on Hypoxia During Intravenous Propofol Anesthesia in Patients With Pre-operative Anxiety: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
    Fang, Yiling
    Jing, Qi
    Cao, Silu
    Sun, Xiaoru
    Zhang, Hui
    Tian, Li
    Li, Cheng
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [46] Effect of different doses of dexmedetomidine on median effective concentration of propofol for anesthesia induction: a randomized controlled trial
    Zhao, X. -N.
    Ran, J. -H.
    Bajracharya, A. R.
    Ma, M. -Y.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 20 (14) : 3134 - 3143
  • [47] Reduced pain on injection with a 0.5% propofol emulsion during induction of anesthesia
    Soltesz, Stefan
    Diekmann, Markus
    Mitrenga-Theusinger, Anja
    Keilen, Matthias
    Molter, Gerd P.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2012, 29 (03) : 162 - 163
  • [48] PROPOFOL - THE EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE ON PAIN DURING INJECTION
    FLETCHER, G
    GILLESPIE, JA
    DAVIDSON, JAH
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1995, 74 : 8 - 8
  • [49] EFFECT OF IBUPROFEN ON PAIN DURING INJECTION OF PROPOFOL
    BATCHELOR, AM
    STAFFORD, MA
    CROSSLEY, AWA
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1990, 65 (04) : P576 - P577
  • [50] The effect of injection rate on hypotension during spinal anesthesia for elective Cesarean section
    Seltenrich, M
    Kamani, A
    Gunka, V
    Douglas, J
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2001, 94 (1A) : U7 - U7