The influence of injection rate on the hypnotic effect of propofol during anesthesia: A randomized trial

被引:10
|
作者
Blum, Jasmin [1 ]
Kochs, Eberhard [1 ]
Forster, Nicole [1 ]
Schneider, Gerhard [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Dept Anesthesiol, D-8000 Munich, Germany
来源
PLOS CLINICAL TRIALS | 2006年 / 1卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1371/journal.pctr.0010017
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objective: Previous studies suggested that slow injection of propofol may increase the hypnotic effect during induction of anesthesia. The aim of the present study was therefore to investigate whether injection rate of propofol has an influence on its maximum effect. Design: Randomized, single-blind trial. Setting: This study has been carried out in the operating rooms of a university hospital. An anesthesiologist and a resident performed the study with the aid of changing nursing staff. Participants: We investigated 99 unpremedicated patients aged 18 to 60 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 1-3. Interventions: Anesthesia was induced by intravenous injection of propofol (2 mg/kg). Propofol was manually injected in group 1 over a period of 5 s; in group 2 (120-s injection interval), and in group 3 (240-s injection interval), propofol was administered by an injection pump. After loss of consciousness, mask ventilation was performed with 100% oxygen. Bispectral index (BIS) was used to measure the hypnotic effect of propofol. After the decrease of BIS to the minimum value (i.e., maximum hypnotic effect) and the following increase of BIS to 60, the study period was finished and anesthesia was performed according to clinical criteria. Outcome Measures: We analyzed whether injection speed has an influence on the maximum hypnotic effect of a given dose of propofol (2 mg/kg). Results: BISmin marks the maximum electroencephalogram (EEG) effect of the propofol bolus as measured by the BIS. The lowest mean BISmin was measured in group 1 (28.7 +/- 10.3). In group 2, BISmin was 33.0 (+/- 13.9), and in group 3, BISmin was 36.4 (+/- 11.0). There were no significant differences between group 2 and groups 1 or 3, but there were significant differences between groups 1 and 3. In group 1, BISmin was reached after 102.91 s (+/- 44.20), in group 2 after 172.33 s (+/- 29.76), and in group 3 after 274.21 s (+/- 45.40). These differences were statistically significant for all comparisons. In summary, the lowest value for BISmin was achieved in the group with the fastest rate of propofol injection (group1, 5 s). The highest BISmin was obtained in the group with the slowest rate of injection (group 3, 240 s). The hemodynamic parameters were not significantly different among groups. Conclusions: The hypnotic peak effect of propofol is lower with extremely slow injection (240 s versus 5 s). For clinically usual injection rates (5 s and 120 s), there was no significant difference in propofol peak effect.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Propofol Anesthesia Does Not Change the Force Used by the Endoscopist During Colonoscopy: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial
    Korman, Louis Y.
    Metz, David C.
    Weinstein, Michael L.
    Sarvazyan, Noune
    Hardi, Robert
    O'Kieffe, Donald
    Widerlite, Lawrence
    Schwartz, Michael
    Wojtera, Tomasz
    Mercer, Hettie
    Egorov, Vladimir
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2016, 83 (05) : AB526 - AB526
  • [32] Comparative efficacy of ciprofol and propofol in reducing respiratory depression during ERCP anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial
    Juanhong Wang
    Rui Wang
    Xiaofang Ma
    Wenjing Zhu
    Baoping Zhang
    Yuhu Ma
    Yatao Liu
    BMC Anesthesiology, 24 (1)
  • [33] Midazolam premedication facilitates mask ventilation in children during propofol induction of anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial
    Rafet Yarimoglu
    Betul Basaran
    Tayfun Et
    Aysegul Bilge
    Muhammet Korkusuz
    BMC Anesthesiology, 25 (1)
  • [34] Psychomotor recovery of dexmedetomidine compared with propofol after sedation during spinal anesthesia: A randomized control trial
    Perika, Tilak
    Gupta, Suman Lata
    Elakkumanan, Lenin Babu
    Kattimani, Shivanand
    JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 35 (02) : 236 - 241
  • [35] The Effect of Propofol on the Success Rate of Transurethral Lithotripsy by Holmium Laser: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Teymourian, Houman
    Ghiasy, Saleh
    Tayebi-azar, Ali
    Razzaghi, Mohammadreza
    Sadri, Ghazal
    Djafari, Anahita Ansari
    Hojjati, Seyyed Ali
    Poury, Mohammad
    Shahabi, Vahid
    Javanmard, Babak
    JOURNAL OF LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 11 (03) : 305 - 309
  • [36] Effect of etomidate and propofol on airway mechanics during induction - A prospective randomized trial
    Jayaram, Kavitha
    Gurajala, Indira
    Kumar, Annekiran
    Durga, Padmaja
    Tejasri, Ketireddy
    JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 39 (03) : 482 - 487
  • [37] Comparison of the infusion rate of rocuronium during propofol and desflurane anesthesia
    Gan, TJ
    Glass, PSA
    Brull, SJ
    Stout, R
    Grant, AP
    Ray, J
    Printsev, Y
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1997, 84 : S486 - S486
  • [38] Heart rate response to intravenous atropine during propofol anesthesia
    Horiguchi, T
    Nishikawa, T
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2002, 95 (02): : 389 - 392
  • [39] Influence of injection rate of hyperbaric bupivacaine on spinal block in parturients: a randomized trial
    Singh, Sudha Indu
    Morley-Forster, Patricia K.
    Shamsah, Mohammed
    Butler, Ron
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2007, 54 (04): : 290 - 295
  • [40] Heart rate response to intravenous atropine during propofol anesthesia
    Horiguchi, T
    Nishikawa, T
    Nagasaki, T
    Sakai, A
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1998, 89 (3A) : U262 - U262