The influence of injection rate on the hypnotic effect of propofol during anesthesia: A randomized trial

被引:10
|
作者
Blum, Jasmin [1 ]
Kochs, Eberhard [1 ]
Forster, Nicole [1 ]
Schneider, Gerhard [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Dept Anesthesiol, D-8000 Munich, Germany
来源
PLOS CLINICAL TRIALS | 2006年 / 1卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1371/journal.pctr.0010017
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objective: Previous studies suggested that slow injection of propofol may increase the hypnotic effect during induction of anesthesia. The aim of the present study was therefore to investigate whether injection rate of propofol has an influence on its maximum effect. Design: Randomized, single-blind trial. Setting: This study has been carried out in the operating rooms of a university hospital. An anesthesiologist and a resident performed the study with the aid of changing nursing staff. Participants: We investigated 99 unpremedicated patients aged 18 to 60 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 1-3. Interventions: Anesthesia was induced by intravenous injection of propofol (2 mg/kg). Propofol was manually injected in group 1 over a period of 5 s; in group 2 (120-s injection interval), and in group 3 (240-s injection interval), propofol was administered by an injection pump. After loss of consciousness, mask ventilation was performed with 100% oxygen. Bispectral index (BIS) was used to measure the hypnotic effect of propofol. After the decrease of BIS to the minimum value (i.e., maximum hypnotic effect) and the following increase of BIS to 60, the study period was finished and anesthesia was performed according to clinical criteria. Outcome Measures: We analyzed whether injection speed has an influence on the maximum hypnotic effect of a given dose of propofol (2 mg/kg). Results: BISmin marks the maximum electroencephalogram (EEG) effect of the propofol bolus as measured by the BIS. The lowest mean BISmin was measured in group 1 (28.7 +/- 10.3). In group 2, BISmin was 33.0 (+/- 13.9), and in group 3, BISmin was 36.4 (+/- 11.0). There were no significant differences between group 2 and groups 1 or 3, but there were significant differences between groups 1 and 3. In group 1, BISmin was reached after 102.91 s (+/- 44.20), in group 2 after 172.33 s (+/- 29.76), and in group 3 after 274.21 s (+/- 45.40). These differences were statistically significant for all comparisons. In summary, the lowest value for BISmin was achieved in the group with the fastest rate of propofol injection (group1, 5 s). The highest BISmin was obtained in the group with the slowest rate of injection (group 3, 240 s). The hemodynamic parameters were not significantly different among groups. Conclusions: The hypnotic peak effect of propofol is lower with extremely slow injection (240 s versus 5 s). For clinically usual injection rates (5 s and 120 s), there was no significant difference in propofol peak effect.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effect of ketamine on the NeuroSENSE WAVCNS during propofol anesthesia; a randomized feasibility trial
    van Heusden, Klaske
    Cooke, Erin
    Brodie, Sonia
    West, Nicholas
    Gorges, Matthias
    Dumont, Guy A.
    Ansermino, J. Mark
    Merchant, Richard N.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 2021, 35 (03) : 557 - 567
  • [2] Effect of ketamine on the NeuroSENSE WAVCNS during propofol anesthesia; a randomized feasibility trial
    Klaske van Heusden
    Erin Cooke
    Sonia Brodie
    Nicholas West
    Matthias Görges
    Guy A Dumont
    J Mark Ansermino
    Richard N Merchant
    Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 2021, 35 : 557 - 567
  • [3] RATE OF INJECTION OF PROPOFOL FOR INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA
    GOODMAN, NW
    BLACK, AMS
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1992, 74 (06): : 938 - 939
  • [4] The Effect of Vibration on Pain During Intravenous Injection of Propofol A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Hwang, Lyahn K.
    Nash, David W.
    Yedlin, Adam
    Greige, Nicolas
    Larios-Valencia, Jessie
    Choice, Curtis
    Pothula, Aravind
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2021, 87 (1S) : S36 - S39
  • [5] DOES CLONIDINE INFLUENCE THE HYPNOTIC EFFECT OF PROPOFOL
    KULKA, PJ
    TRYBA, M
    SCZEPANSKI, U
    ZENZ, M
    ANAESTHESIST, 1993, 42 (09): : 630 - 637
  • [6] Effect of photobiomodulation on pain level during local anesthesia injection: a randomized clinical trial
    Ghabraei, Sholeh
    Bolhari, Behnam
    Nashtaie, Hasan Mohammad
    Noruzian, Mohammad
    Niavarzi, Soheil
    Chiniforush, Nasim
    JOURNAL OF COSMETIC AND LASER THERAPY, 2020, 22 (4-5) : 180 - 184
  • [7] Muscle relaxation does not alter hypnotic level during propofol anesthesia
    Greif, R
    Greenwald, S
    Schweitzer, E
    Laciny, S
    Rajek, A
    Caldwell, JE
    Sessler, DI
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2002, 94 (03): : 604 - 608
  • [8] The choice of the hypnotic drug (volatile or propofol) for maintenance of anesthesia does not influence surgical conditions during cranioplasty
    Grau, S.
    Denizci, C.
    von Spreckelsen, N.
    Goldbrunner, R.
    Boettiger, B. W.
    Hinkelbein, J.
    JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2018, 34 (02) : 172 - 176
  • [9] The effect of epidural lidocaine administration on sedation of propofol general anesthesia: a randomized trial
    Xiang, Yan
    Chen, Chao-qin
    Chen, Han-jian
    Li, Mei
    Bao, Fang-ping
    Zhu, Sheng-mei
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2014, 26 (07) : 523 - 529
  • [10] Effect of nitrous oxide and dexmedetomidine on the consumption of propofol during general anesthesia in adult patients: A randomized controlled trial
    Biyani, Ghansham
    Bhatia, Pradeep Kumar
    Mohammed, Sadik
    Bihani, Pooja
    Kamal, Manoj
    Chhabra, Swati
    INDIAN ANAESTHETISTS FORUM, 2022, 23 (01): : 12 - 18