Selection for orchardgrass seed yield in target vs. nontarget environments

被引:20
|
作者
Casler, MD [1 ]
Barker, RE
Brummer, EC
Papadopolous, YA
Hoffman, LD
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, USDA ARS, US Dairy Forage Res Ctr, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] USDA ARS, Natl Forage Seed Prod Res Ctr, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[3] Iowa State Univ, Dept Agron, Ames, IA 50010 USA
[4] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Charlottetown, PE C1A 4N6, Canada
[5] Livestock Res Ctr, Charlottetown, PE C1A 4N6, Canada
[6] Penn State Univ, Dept Agron, State Coll, PA 16801 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2135/cropsci2003.0532
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Simultaneous improvement of forage traits and seed yield in orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.) has been problematic because of geographic separation of forage and seed production locations. Previous work has shown that a complex multilocation selection program in forage production environments can increase forage yield as well as seed yield in Oregon. The objective of this experiment was to compare target-environment (TE) and nontarget-environment (NTE) selection approaches for increasing seed yield of orchardgrass in Oregon. Two cycles of recurrent phenotypic selection for panicle seed mass (PSM) and agronomic traits were conducted on four populationsin four eastern USA locations (NTE) and one Oregon location (TE). Seed yield was increased in three of four orchardgrass populations by TE selection, averaging 5.1% cycle(-1), but was improved by NTE selection in only one of four populations. Conversely, TE selection for PSM and agronomic traits resulted in no changes to forage yield in the eastern USA and Canada, while NTE selection for PSM and agronomic traits increased forage yield in two of four populations, confirming results of a previous study. It appears that the most efficient system for simultaneously improving forage and seed traits of orchardgrass would be to practice selection for forage traits in forage production environments and seed traits in seed production environments, with sufficiently large populations to allow multitrait selection.
引用
收藏
页码:532 / 538
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Balanced vs. slightly unbalanced selection
    Rodríguez, LS
    HEREDITY, 2000, 84 (06) : 685 - 691
  • [32] ERP markers of target selection discriminate children with high vs. low working memory capacity
    Shimi, Andria
    Nobre, Anna Christina
    Scerif, Gaia
    FRONTIERS IN SYSTEMS NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 9
  • [33] SELECTION CRITERIA FOR SEED YIELD IN GRAIN LEGUMES
    RUBAIHAYO, PR
    EAST AFRICAN AGRICULTURAL AND FORESTRY JOURNAL, 1976, 41 (04) : 289 - 293
  • [34] LATENCY DEPENDENCE OF COLOR-BASED TARGET VS NONTARGET DISCRIMINATION BY THE SACCADIC SYSTEM
    OTTES, FP
    VANGISBERGEN, JAM
    EGGERMONT, JJ
    VISION RESEARCH, 1985, 25 (06) : 849 - 862
  • [35] Seed yield and physiological quality of soybean in different environments
    Rodrigues Gomes, Greice Daiane
    Benin, Giovani
    Rosinha, Rui Colvara
    Galvan, Danielle
    Pagliosa, Eduardo Stefani
    Pinnow, Cilas
    da Silva, Cristiano Lemes
    Beche, Eduardo
    SEMINA-CIENCIAS AGRARIAS, 2012, 33 : 2593 - 2604
  • [36] EGG YIELD VS. EGG QUALITY.
    Chang, C.
    Linn, J. M.
    Shapiro, D. B.
    Toledo, A. A.
    Best, M. W.
    Nagy, Z.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2015, 104 (03) : E323 - E323
  • [37] Investment vs. yield relationship for memories in SOC
    Zorian, Y
    INTERNATIONAL TEST CONFERENCE 2004, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, : 1444 - 1444
  • [38] Selection of a Visible-Light vs. Thermal Infrared Sensor in Dynamic Environments Based on Confidence Measures
    Serrano-Cuerda, Juan
    Fernandez-Caballero, Antonio
    Lopez, Maria T.
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2014, 4 (03): : 331 - 350
  • [39] Eudaimonia vs. hedonism as therapy target in psychotherapy
    Linden, Michael
    PSYCHOTHERAPIE, 2024, 69 (01): : 63 - 66
  • [40] Target formation in BZ: Nucleation vs. fluctuation
    Kast, Emma R.
    Prado, Diego J.
    Hastings, Harold M.
    Sobel, Sabrina G.
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 247